Is ‘Omega Sign’ anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate technique reproducible?

We aimed to evaluate the learning curve of the surgically standardised ‘Omega Sign’ anatomical endoscopic enucleation (AEEP) of the prostate surgery technique for junior surgeons. This study is a retrospective comparison of cases that underwent AEEP by a mentor surgeon and three junior surgeons who have completed their learning curve. A video-based laser enucleation of the prostate assessment tool (LEAT) composed of 8 steps of the technique was used to assess a senior surgeon and junior surgeons’ surgical compatibility and consistency. The surgeon who defined Omega Sign technique was determined as group 1, and cases by three junior surgeons were identified as group 2. The end points were to assess the reproducibility and repeatability and operative post-operative outcomes of the technique. 55 patients’ videos were rated by five experienced endourologists. There was no significant difference in LEAT scores between the groups among all steps. The most symmetry was found in the 1st and 3rd steps. Inter-rater consistency was also high for each step, with no statistically significant difference between the evaluators. The standardised anatomical ‘Omega Sign’ technique is reproducible for the junior surgeons. The operative steps can be performed with high consistency, and the functional and perioperative outcomes are comparable with the senior surgeon.     

Application of network pharmacology and molecular docking to elucidate the potential mechanism of Astragalus–Scorpion against prostate cancer

The present study aimed to investigate the molecular mechanism of the Astragalus–Scorpion drug pair in the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa). We employed network pharmacology and molecular docking technology to retrieving the active ingredients and corresponding targets of Astragalus–Scorpion by using TCMSP, BATMAN-TCM, TCMID and Swiss Target Prediction Databases. The targets related to PCa were retrieved through GeneCards. Cytoscape software was used to construct the ‘active ingredient–target disease’ network, and GO and KEGG enrichment analyses were performed on the common targets. Autodock software was used for molecular docking verification. In total, 26 active ingredients, 340 potential targets related to active ingredients and 122 common targets were screened from Astragalus–Scorpion drug pair. The core targets of the protein–protein interaction (PPI) network were JUN, AKT1, IL6, MAPK1 and RELA, whereas the core active ingredients were quercetin, kaempferol, formononetin, 7-o-methylisomucronulatol and calycosin. Nearly 762 GO entries and 154 pathways were obtained by using the pathway enrichment analysis. Molecular docking results revealed that quercetin and kaempferol bind to AKT1 and formononetin binds to RELA, all of which were found to be stable bounds.     

An update on atypical large glandular proliferations of the prostate

The differential diagnosis of prostatic atypical large gland proliferations includes several benign and malignant entities. This review focusses on issues relevant to the practising pathologist, particularly around areas of controversy such as high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDCP). HGPIN is a putative precursor of prostate cancer, but its clinical relevance is as a surrogate marker of unsampled prostate cancer, thereby identifying patients who would benefit from a prompt repeat biopsy. The incidence of missed prostate cancer is much lower in contemporary practice due to pre-biopsy MRI and extended sampling protocols so HGPIN is currently less important. It is however important to distinguish HGPIN from PIN-like carcinoma and IDCP. PIN-like carcinoma is considered a histological subtype/variant of acinar prostate carcinoma and should be graded as Gleason pattern 3. A diagnosis of cribriform HGPIN should not be made in needle biopsies as such a proliferation may represent IDCP. This review discusses controversies related to the diagnosis, reporting and management of IDCP. A personalized approach to management of patients with isolated IDCP in needle biopsies that is based on the histological and radiological features of an individual case is outlined.