Bruno et le fou sacré : Mythe, Mimesis et la transmission des mémoires traumatiques

Interest in PTSD and traumatic memory extends beyond psychiatry. Over the last two decades, “trauma theory” has emerged as an influential discourse within the humanities and social sciences. The theory is based on an unlikely combination of sources: Freud's accounts of traumatic neurosis in Beyond the Pleasure Principle and Moses and Monotheism; Bessel van der Kolk's research into the neurophysiology of PTSD and somatic memory; and post-modern writing on collective memory. Trauma theory writers are intensely interested in explaining how traumatic memories are transmitted between and within generations. Explanations focus on the roles of contagion as a mode of transmission and the Holocaust as a shared collective trauma. This chapter argues that the clinical and cultural phenomena that are being explained by these writers are better understood in terms of mimesis or imitation. The argument is illustrated with the help of a fraudulent Holocaust ‘memoir’ by Benjamin Wilkomirski, and an analysis of audience responses once the fraud was exposed. This chapter underlines important concerns regarding the clinical epistemology of posttraumatic stress disorder.     

Visuospatial context processing in untreated schizophrenic patients and relation to disorganization syndrome

AIM: Previous studies on schizophrenia have suggested that context-processing disturbances were one of the core cognitive deficits present in schizophrenia. Schizophrenic patients have a failure either of inhibition strategy and maintenance of visuospatial information (25) in condition of contextual interference. In the present study, we explored the performances of untreated schizophrenic patients with 2 tasks exploring detection and long term retention of complex visual features and field dependence-independence tasks were selected. These abilities involve temporary maintenance of visuospatial information and executive functioning of visual working memory system. Several studies have shown that cognitive deficit may depend on schizophrenic symptomatology. However results remain controversial in determining the specific influence of negative and positive symptomatologies as well as clinical disorganization. Our goal was to explore the processing of spatial context and its relation to disorganized syndrome. This study was approved by the local ethic committee. METHODOLOGY: Thirty-six schizophrenic patients were included according to DSM IV criteria (19 neuroleptic na?ve, 17 unmedicated patients during more than 3 months). Thirty-six healthy controls were matched to patients for age, gender and level of education. Absence of axis 1 pathology was attested for controls with SCID-NP. Current symptomatology was evaluated by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) (14). Clinical disorganisation was evaluated with the disorganisation score established upon a factorial analysis of PANSS by Lepine and Lan?on. Items selected to distinguish the disorganised group were abstraction, disorganization, orientation, and attention. PROCEDURE: Two tasks of embedded figures were administered individually to patients and controls. The Faverge task (Research of Figures-RF) (10) evaluates the ability to recognize the target from spatial complex geometrical figures. The Group Embedded Figure Task (GEFT - Oltman) assesses the detection and maintenance of visual target and its recognition within a complex figure. Performance between patients and controls were compared with the Student T test. The comparison of two clinical subgroups of disorganized and low disorganized patients and control group was performed with an ANOVA. Tuckey test was used for pairwise comparisons. RESULTS: We defined two subgroups of patients, disorganized patients (subscore 12, n=17) and low disorganized patients (subscore<12, n=19). Theses 2 subgroups were similar for age and level of education. Concerning the two tasks, there was no significant difference between schizophrenic patients and normal controls. The comparison between subgroups of disorganized and low disorganized patients, for RF task, showed a decrease of correct answers with disorganized patients (p<0.05). For GEFT task, disorganized patients had a decrease of correct answers p<0.01) and more errors (p<0.01) and omissions (p<0.05). The low disorganized patients exhibited for the two tests comparable performance to controls. The disorganized patients had a decrease of right answers (p<0.05) and more errors (p<0.05) than controls for GEFT task and no significant difference for RF. However, with IQ (evaluated with an abstract reasoning test) introduced as covariate, only correct answers for GEFT task remain significant (p<0.05). DISCUSSION: The weak performance of disorganized schizophrenic patients for two tasks RF and GEFT showed that treatment of visuospatial information was impaired in the first perceptive phase of selection and in the organization of information (RF), especially with the maintenance of visual information in memory (GEFT). By contrast, low disorganized patients demonstrated a correct analytic treatment of elementary processing and visuospatial working memory. CONCLUSION: The severity of disorganization influences the visuospatial context processing and visuospatial working memory. These results show the heterogeneity of cognitive functioning regarding to schizophrenic symptomatologies. This difficulty could be related to a problem of central executive functioning in the visuospatial component of working memory, possibly mediated by the dysfunction of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.     

Le test des gobelets : normes et propriétés de détection d’un trouble cognitif chez des sujets sélectionnés en population générale

Introduction

Most current tools exploring visuospatial memory abilities are poorly adapted to the elderly population. The Goblets test allows a brief evaluation of visuospatial memory abilities through an encoding phase in which the participant has to learn a particular sequence and a further delayed recall phase. The aim of the present work was to produce normative scores for this test and to study its properties in the detection of dementia.

Methods

Data were collected in a sample of 1002 agricultural retirees aged 65 years and over included in the AMI study, a population-based cohort study conducted in Gironde (southwestern France). The sample analyzed to establish normative data included 795 non-institutionalized and non-demented participants. Regarding the validity study, the sample analyzed included 912 participants of whom 76 subjects with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.

Results

Normative scores were calculated according to age (65–74 years and 75 years and over) and educational level (primary school level not validated by a diploma, primary school level validated by a diploma and more than a primary school level). The normative scores of the learning phase were described using the percentiles while rates of success were reported for the delayed recall. Regarding the properties of the test, the Goblets test seemed to be more specific than sensitive and presented high negative predictive values. The Youden index showed that the better cut-off score was two trials (with 75.0% sensitivity and 83.0% specificity).

Conclusion

The Goblets test can be a helpful tool in screening for dementia. Nevertheless, like many other simple and quick cognitive tests, it cannot be used alone to establish the diagnosis of dementia. This test has the advantage to be easy to administer in clinical situations; the normative scores presented in this study could be used as an aid to interpret a patient's performance.