医学生电子健康素养现状及影响因素研究

目的 调查医学生电子健康素养及影响因素。方法 采用高校学生电子媒介健康素养量表,对山东省某医学院校775名医学生进行问卷调查。结果 医学生电子健康素养总分为（73.55±14.98）分,其中电子媒介健康获取能力、电子媒介健康评价能力、电子媒介健康实践能力维度得分分别为（26.74±5.79）、（29.15±6.43）、（17.66±4.48）分。多元线性回归分析结果显示,学习目的（B = 3.545,95%CI = 2.573～4.516）、助人行为（B = 4.259,95%CI = 2.591～5.927）、就医行为（B = 2.310,95%CI = 1.019～3.601）、运动情况（B = 3.239,95%CI = 1.810～4.668）、人际关系（B = 4.555,95%CI = 2.630～6.480）、吃早餐（B = 2.122,95%CI = 0.901～3.343）、身体健康状况（B = - 1.858,95%CI = - 3.158～- 0.558）是医学生电子健康素养的影响因素（均P＜0.05）。结论 高等医学院校应引导医学生明确学习目的,培养其人文关怀和人际交往能力,养成吃早餐与体育运动等健康生活方式,引导医学生及时就医,避免吸烟等健康危害行为以提升电子健康素养,促进其医学综合能力和生命质量的提高。     

Assessing the Digital Health Literacy Skills of Tween Participants in a School-Library-Based After-School Program

Although young people are increasingly turning to the Internet for health-related information, very little is known about the state of their digital health literacy skills. At the beginning of an after-school program (HackHealth) to assist middle school students (ages 12–15) with their digital health literacy skills, a specially designed Digital Healthy Literacy Assessment Tool (DHLAT) was administered to 19 participants. Results suggest that while tweens are familiar with search engines and have a rudimentary sense of how to use them, they often lack important knowledge and skills needed to be fully digitally health literate. More research is needed to develop more broadly applicable tools for assessing tweens’ digital health literacy skills and to discover additional ways to work with youth to ensure they are equipped with the digital health literacy skills they need to successfully find, understand, assess, manage, and make use of online health information.     

What happens when seniors participate in new eHealth schemes?

This article adds empirical depth to our understanding of seniors’ involvement in the making of eHealth systems. Multi-sited interviews and observations were conducted at seniors’ homes before an eHealth system was installed, during the home trials and post-removal of the system. Our findings indicate that although the senior participants chose to participate in the home trials, the choice itself was configured by the stigmatization of seniors as technophobes, fear of “falling behind” and the association of technology with youth, the future and being up-to-date. Being a participant in home trials of an eHealth system became an identity of its own, representing a forward thinking and contemporary person who embraced changes and new technology.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• This article highlights the importance of understanding the participants' drive to participate in field trials and the impact this motivation has on how, during field trials, they perceive using an eHealth system and its perceived usefulness.

• When studying eHealth systems “in the making at senior” participants' homes, the seniors become part of the research team. The senior participants' learning and knowledge transfer evolves from the dialogue with the research team. For equal participation and power there is a need for ethical, mutual and equal power-relations in the research team (between researchers from different paradigms such as engineers and sociologists) as well as between the researchers' and the participants'.