经颅多普勒超声在不明原因缺血性脑卒中的应用研究

目的探讨经颅多普勒超声(transcranial Doppler,TCD)技术结合生理盐水发泡试验在不明原因缺血性脑卒中患者卵圆孔未闭(PFO)筛查中的应用价值。方法收集51例55岁以下不明原因缺血性脑卒中患者,行TCD结合生理盐水发泡试验和经胸超声心动图(TTE)检查。结果 51例患者中,23例患者TCD检查栓子信号阳性,其中18例患者TTE检查发现PFO,而在28例TCD检查栓子信号阴性的患者中未发现PFO;TCD检查阳性患者中偏头痛发病率、合并下肢深静脉血栓比例以及房间隔瘤比例较阴性者高(P<0.05)。结论 TCD结合生理盐水发泡试验是筛查PFO的有效手段,可以作为不明原因缺血性脑卒中病因筛查的手段。     

Patent Foramen Ovale Not So Patent

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) with agitated saline contrast is the most sensitive tool for diagnosing patent foramen ovale (PFO), but false positives can result. We report a patient who underwent a TEE during the study of a cryptogenic stroke. Contrast appeared in the left atrium with the Valsalva maneuver. However, the contrast exit site was not identified, and contrast continued to appear with Valsalva once the saline microbubbles had disappeared. Combined with the contrast characteristics, this suggested a spontaneous contrast phenomenon rather than a PFO. This phenomenon must be kept in mind to avoid overdiagnosing PFO .     

经颅多普勒诊断卵圆孔未闭

经颅多普勒(trmscranial Doppler,TCD)诊断卵圆孔未闭(patent foramen ovale, PFO)的方法至今已有20年历史.1999年威尼斯会议规定了此方法的标准化步骤,同时也提出了一些问题.近10年来,研究者对该方法进行了更加深入的研究,文章对相关研究进展做了综述.     

微栓子监测新进展

自1990年以来,微栓子监测技术已广泛应用于临床和实验研究并取得了一些进展.文章就近年来微栓子监测在临床研究中取得的新进展、面临的问题以及新的发展方向进行了综述.     

小脑延髓池的显微外科解剖研究

目的研究小脑延髓池的显微外科解剖特征,探讨其临床意义.方法选择经10%福尔马林固定成人头颈标本15例,显微镜下(5～25倍)模拟枕下极外侧入路、颈-乳突入路和耳前颞下窝入路的手术操作,分别自后、侧和前方显露小脑延髓池内结构,详细观测其神经血管结构的形态特征.结果小脑延髓池位于延髓外侧,上至桥延沟,下达枕骨大孔,侧方沿枕骨形成蛛网膜袖套进入颈静脉孔和舌下神经管.舌咽神经、迷走神经和副神经的根丝自上而下起自橄榄体背侧、延髓和脊髓的后外侧沟,根丝逐级汇合后分别进入舌咽神经道和迷走神经道.椎动脉于小脑延髓池的下端入颅后经该池行向前上内进入延髓前池.小脑下后动脉(PICA)可分为延髓前段、延髓侧段、扁桃体延髓段、脉络膜扁桃体段和皮质段.主要的静脉有小脑延髓裂内静脉、延髓静脉、小脑岩面下组静脉和岩下桥静脉.结论小脑绒球和Luschka孔脉络丛复合体及颈静脉孔硬膜返折可作为辨认舌咽神经脑池段的解剖标志,深刻认识小脑延髓池的蛛网膜界限对手术处理累及小脑延髓池的不同性质病变,保护重要神经功能意义重大.     

下腔静脉加压法与Valsalva动作在提高卵圆孔未闭检出率中的对比研究

目的 探讨下腔静脉加压法与Valsalva动作在经食道超声心动图(Transesophageal echocardiography,TEE)对卵圆孔未闭(Patent foramen ovale,PFO)检出率中的差异。方法 回顾性分析手术证实的PFO患者114例,包括对比增强经颅多普勒超声(Contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler ultrasonography,c-TCD)少量右向左分流(Right-to-left shunt,RLS)(n=51)组、中量RLS(n=37)组、大量RLS(n=26)组,记录常规TEE超声、Valsalva动作配合下TEE检查、PFO封堵术前无痛TEE下下腔静脉加压检测,分析3组房间隔右向左一过性分流信号发生率的不同和其它临床因素在3组间的差异。结果 3组身体质量指数(Body mass index,BMI)、高血压病、高脂血症及冠心病的比例无明显差异(P>0.05); 大量RLS组患者年龄明显小于少量RLS及中量RLS组(P<0.05)。少量RLS及中量RLS组患者Valsalva动作和下腔静脉加压后较常规TEE下PFO的显示率均有提高(P<0.01); 大量RLS组患者Valsalva动作和下腔静脉加压后PFO显示率改变不明显(P>0.05)。结论 大量RLS患者较少量及中量RLS患者的年龄小,更容易早期出现临床症状; 下腔静脉加压法可以替代Valsalva动作提高TEE超声对PFO的检出率。     

Diffusion‐weighted imaging findings differ between stroke attributable to spontaneous cervical artery dissection and patent foramen ovale

Background and purpose: Spontaneous cervical arterial dissection and patent foramen ovale (PFO) are important causes of stroke in younger patients. We tested whether characteristics of cerebral ischaemia visible on diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) aid in differentiating between these two aetiologies. Methods: Diffusion‐weighted imaging was performed after a median of 2 days [interquartile range (IQR) 1–3 days] in 94 consecutive patients with an acute ischaemic stroke caused either by carotid or vertebral artery dissection (n = 33) or PFO (n = 61). We compared number, size, location and predefined patterns of DWI lesions between both aetiologies. Results: Ninety‐three out of 94 patients had acute DWI lesions and were included in the analysis. Multiple DWI lesions occurred more frequently in patients with dissection (23/33, 70%) than in those with PFO (26/60, 43%, P = 0.02). Lesions were larger in the dissection group [median diameter of largest lesion, 50 mm (IQR 19–68 mm)] than in the PFO group [23 (9–48) mm; P = 0.02]. The distribution of lesion patterns differed between the two aetiologies (P < 0.001): single, non‐territorial infarcts were more frequent in PFO (25/60, 42%) than in dissection (2/33, 6%); large territorial infarcts with or without additional smaller lesions in the same territory occurred in 20/33 (61%) patients with dissection and in 16/60 (27%) patients with PFO. Conclusions: Diffusion‐weighted imaging characteristics differ between PFO and dissection, suggesting differences in the pathogenesis of brain infarction between these aetiologies. A single non‐territorial infarct seems to favour PFO as stroke aetiology. Whether this or other features are distinctive enough to diagnose PFO or dissection in individual patients requires further testing.