Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in heart failure: Physicians' prescribing behavior

Background: Several studies document an underuse of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) in heart failure (HF) patients, despite their proven efficacy and good tolerability. Also, there is some evidence that the doses used in clinical practice are far lower than those used in clinical trials.Methods and Results: To identify patterns of ACEI use in HF patients this study examined data collected on admission day regarding demographic, clinical, and medical care characteristics of 355 patients hospitalized because of decompensated HF who were treated with and without ACEIs. Additionally, measures of in-hospital outcome were compared among the two groups. Fifty-eight point six percent of patients were receiving ACEIs at admission and 80.6% were treated with ACEIs during hospitalization. The average ACEI does was low. No differences were observed in age and measures of severity of HF between ACEI-prescribed and nonprescribed patients. Patterns that could explain ACEI underuse included female sex, lower systolic blood pressure, worse renal function, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, use of alternate drugs (eg, spironolactone), and overall less intense medical management. Patterns associated with the use of lower doses of ACEIs included older age, higher New York Heart Association functional class, and lower systolic blood pressure. In-hospital death rates were significantly higher for patients not treated with ACEIs.Conclusions: This study suggests that many patients eligible for ACEI treatment were deprived of the advantages of these drugs because of erroneous clinical strategies. Nevertheless, the patterns of ACEI use were similar to those reported by other studies. Clinical trials conducted to determine the risk/benefit ratio of ACEI use in patients with renal dysfunction and the utility of ACEIs in diastolic HF, as well as programs to educate care providers on proper use of ACEIs in HF patients, are strongly recommended.     

HIV/AIDS patients’ perspectives on adhering to regimens containing protease inhibitors

OBJECTIVE: To gather qualitative data regarding HIV/AIDS patients’ perspectives about HIV-1 protease inhibitors (PIs), and about their experiences taking and adhering to regimens containing PIs. DESIGN: Six focus groups of persons under care for HIV were conducted between September and November 1996 regarding participants’ knowledge, awareness, experiences when taking, and adherence to antiretroviral regimens containing PIs. An identical discussion guide was used to facilitate all six groups. Focus group proceedings were audiotaped, transcribed, coded for themes, and analyzed qualitatively. SETTING: HIV/AIDS practices of three teaching hospitals and two community health centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-six patients with HIV disease: 28 men and 28 women. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Knowledge and positive impressions of PIs were prevalent among this diverse group of persons with HIV, and did not differ by race/ethnicity or gender. Most knew that these were new, potent medications for treating HIV/AIDS. Networks of persons with HIV and medical providers were the most important information sources. Those taking PIs were aware that adherence to the regimen is important, and most were using special strategies to maximize their own adherence, but expressed considerable frustration about the central role these medication regimens had assumed in their life. A subset who did not believe they would adhere to these regimens had declined treatment with them. Motivating factors for taking and adhering to these complex regimens were improving CD4 counts and viral loads and the patient-provider relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Among those with HIV/AIDS, awareness of PIs and their effectiveness is substantial, owing to the impact of informal networks and medical providers. This early positive “reputation” of PIs may enhance motivation for adherence. Those who are taking PIs invest substantial effort adhering to these complex regimens, but resent the need to make medications the focus of their lives. Preliminary findings of this study were presented at the Society of General Internal Medicine annual meeting on May 3, 1997, and the National Conference on Women and HIV on May 6, 1997. This research was supported by a Generalist Physician Faculty Scholar Award from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and a grant from Merck and Co., Inc.     

Successful use of protease inhibitors in HIV-infected haemophilia patients

The haemophilias are a group of inherited haemostatic disorders that require regular clotting factor replacement therapy in the severe and moderately severe subgroups. Prior to the introduction of adequate viral inactivation methods in 1985, haemophilia patients were at exceptionally high risk of contracting blood-borne viruses from factor concentrates as each batch was derived from the plasma of thousands of donors. As a result, approximately 60% of these patients were infected with HIV between 1979 and 1985, and HIV infection now contributes significantly to the morbidity and mortality seen in this group.
Protease inhibitors (PIs) have been shown to significantly log reduce viral loads and increase CD4 cell counts in HIV-infected individuals. Recently, there has been concern about their use in HIV-infected haemophilia patients following increased bleeding episodes in some patients during PI therapy. We prospectively studied the effect of PI therapy in 20 HIV-infected haemophilia patients at our centre over a 6-month period. The mean increase in CD4 cell count was 70 × 10⁶/l and the mean log decrease in viral load was 1.59 over the study period. Gastrointestinal side-effects (nausea and vomiting in five, diarrhoea in two) were the most frequent and resulted in discontinuation of the medication in two patients. Factor concentrate usage for the group on and off study was similar. One severe FVIII patient reported a single episode of an unusual bleed which responded promptly to FVIII concentrate infusion. The significant clinical and laboratory benefits in terms of HIV disease and the paucity of added bleeding complications suggest that PI therapy should not be withheld from HIV-infected haemophilics. Further prospective studies evaluating the efficacy and possible haemostatic complications related to these promising inhibitors of the HIV protease are needed.     

Management guidelines for uninvestigated and functional dyspepsia in the Asia-Pacific region: First Asian Pacific working party on functional dyspepsia

Dyspepsia is most optimally defined as pain or discomfort centred in the upper abdomen. The symptom complex may be caused by peptic ulcer disease, gastro-oesophageal reflux, or gastric cancer but is most often due to functional (or non-ulcer) dyspepsia. While upper endoscopy is the method of choice to determine the underlying cause of dyspepsia, it is expensive. A more pragmatic approach is needed in the Asia-Pacific region where health services are limited. A detailed treatment algorithm is given for managing patients presenting with new-onset dyspepsia and documented functional dyspepsia after endoscopy, and evidence to support this approach is reviewed. Prompt endoscopy is recommended for patients with alarm features. In patients without alarm features, treatment for 2–4 weeks with an empirical anti-secretory or prokinetic agent, followed by investigation using non-invasive Helicobacter pylori testing and treatment for patients who do not respond or relapse, is recommended. Trials of management strategies are now needed to establish the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the approaches recommended.     

Immunoadsorption for removal of inhibitors: update on treatments in Malmö–Lund between 1980 and 1995

Treatment of severe bleeding and the performance of surgery in Haemophilia patients with inhibitors creates severe problems. It is generally agreed that treatment is most effective if circulating levels of factor VIII/IX can be achieved long enough for control of heamostasis. Immunoadsorption with protein A for the removal of inhibitor has improved treatment for patients with initial inhibitor titres too high to neutralize by infusion alone.
  This is a summary of our experience in Malmö regarding immunoadsorption and heamostatis. A total of 19 applications with immunoadsorption in 10 patients were performed. On all occasions it was possible to eliminate totally the inhibitor or reduce it to low levels that could easily be neutralized with factor concentrate. Heamostatic levels of coagulation factors could be maintained for 5–9 days in all but one patient. This period was sufficient to stop ongoing heamorrhage or prevent excessive bleeding at surgical interventions.     

Immune tolerance: a synopsis of the international experience

Summary. Because of the increased morbidity and cost of care associated with inhibitor development, immune tolerance therapy (ITT) is of crucial value in the care of haemophilia. The 24-year experience with this modality, primarily in the treatment of factor VIII inhibitors, has included the use of both high and low doses of clotting factor, with and without immune modulation. Overall success rates for ITT in haemophilia A have been similar (63–83%), while median time to IT has been variable (1.2–24 months). The role of type and purity of clotting factor used remains unclear. Three immune tolerance registries have suggested the potential importance of treatment parameters such as pre-induction inhibitor titer and daily factor dose in the prediction of successful outcome. Ultimately, prospective randomized studies of ITT are required to definitively compare therapeutic regimens with respect to efficacy, safety, and cost effectiveness.     

高血压心肌肥厚患者心脏交感神经分布与勿动蛋白A表达变化的关系

目的探讨高血压心肌肥厚患者心脏交感神经分布与神经元轴突生长抑制因子勿动蛋白A(neurite out-growth inhibitor-A,Nogo-A)的表达变化。方法从我院老年患者尸体标本库中,随机入选男性高血压患者10例,并根据患者去世前1周心脏超声结果分为心肌肥厚组4例和非心肌肥厚组6例。检测超声心动图,并计算左心室重量指数。免疫组织化学分析测定酪氨酸羟化酶(tyrosine hydroxylase,TH)与Nogo-A的表达。结果与非心肌肥厚组比较,心肌肥厚组患者室间隔厚度、左心室后壁厚度、左心室重量指数明显升高(P<0.05);心肌肥厚组患者心肌TH阳性表达明显降低[(6.35±3.85)%υs(22.17±8.19)%,P<0.05],Nogo A表达明显增加[(11.34±7.16)%υs(2.17±4.10)%,P<0.05]。心肌肥厚患者心肌Nogo-A表达与心肌TH表达呈负相关(r=-0.33,P<0.05)。结论老年高血压心肌肥厚患者心肌交感神经分布减低,然而心肌神经元轴突生长抑制因子Nogo-A表达增加,两者间存在密切相关性。     

Efficacy of adding sodium alginate to omeprazole in patients with nonerosive reflux disease: a randomized clinical trial

Nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) is the most common form of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Patients with NERD have a lower response rate to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) than patients with erosive esophagitis when gauged from relief of heartburn. Sodium alginate decreases the acidity of refluxate and protects the esophageal mucosa. However, whether the addition of sodium alginate to PPI therapy can improve NERD symptoms remains unknown. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of adding sodium alginate to basal PPI therapy for NERD. Patients who had experienced heartburn on at least 2 days per week during the 1-month period before entering the study and had no endoscopic mucosal breaks (grade M or N according to Hoshihara's modification of the Los Angeles classification) were randomized to one of two treatments for 4 weeks: omeprazole (20 mg once daily) plus sodium alginate (30 mL four times a day) (group A) or omeprazole (20 mg once daily) alone (group B). Eighty-seven patients were enrolled, and 76 patients were randomly assigned to group A (n = 36) or group B (n = 40). Complete resolution of heartburn for at least 7 consecutive days by the end of treatment was significantly more common in group A (56.7%) than in group B (25.7%). One patient from group A had mild drug-related diarrhea that was not clinically serious. In conclusion, omeprazole combined with sodium alginate was better than omeprazole alone in Japanese patients with NERD.     

Low prevalence of inhibitor antibodies in the Canadian haemophilia population

Annual reporting of inhibitors to factors (FVIII) and IX (FIX) to the Canadian Haemophilia Registry has suggested a lower prevalence than that published in the literature. We performed a prospective study to determine the prevalence of patients with inhibitors directed against either FVIII or FIX. Patients with inhibitors were classified as: (i) inhibitor test positive; (ii) inhibitor test negative but on immune tolerance induction (ITI); (iii) inhibitor test negative but bypass treatment recommended; or (iv) inhibitor resolved. One year later, the cohort was re-classified. The prevalence of inhibitors on 1 May, 2007 was 3.3% for haemophilia A, 0.6% for haemophilia B and 8.9% and 2.1% for severe haemophilia A and B. One year later 17 individuals gained and 11 individuals lost inhibitor status (10 of these with ITI). This study suggests that the prevalence of inhibitors in our population is lower than that was previously published. We hypothesize that this is primarily due to the increased use of ITI, but other factors may be the unselected nature of the cohort and the restriction of the study to one date thereby conforming as close as practical to the definition of prevalence rather than incidence. The classification system used in this study was easy for clinics to apply and was important in defining the population with inhibitors.