IntroductionAccessibility to health care is important to cancer survival. The U.S. military health system (MHS) provides universal health care access. However, whether the universal care has been translated into improved cancer survival is unknown. We compared survival of patients with breast cancer in the MHS with that in the U.S. general population and assessed the differences in cancer stage at diagnosis and treatment receipt between the two populations.MethodsThe MHS patients (n = 31,548) were identified from the Department of Defense's (DoD) Automated Central Tumor Registry (ACTUR). Patients in the U.S. general population (n = 63,096) were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. The two populations were matched on age, race, and diagnosis year. Multivariable Cox regression hazard modeling was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) comparing ACTUR with SEER. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) comparing stage and treatment receipt.ResultsACTUR patients exhibited a 24% lower overall mortality than the SEER patients (HR = 0.76, 95% CI, 0.71-0.80). They were less likely to present with later stage compared to the SEER patients (OR = 0.61, 95% CI, 0.55-0.67 for stage IV tumors). The ACTUR patients with stages I-III tumors were more likely to receive surgery (OR = 1.35, 95% CI, 1.20-1.52) but less likely to receive radiation (OR = 0.91, 95% CI, 0.88-0.94). The survival advantage of ACTUR patients remained regardless of surgery or radiation receipt.ConclusionsBreast cancer patients with universal health care access had improved survival compared to patients in the general population. 相似文献
Background: The level of the systemic inflammatory marker C-reactive protein (CRP) is elevated in many patients with malignant disease and may be related to nutritional status.
Objective: To analyze the association between serum CRP levels in patients with malignant tumors and their nutritional status.
Method: A total of 3,692 cases were analyzed and the serum CRP levels were determined using an immunometric assay. Nutritional status was assessed by using patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA). The biochemical evaluation of prealbumin (PA), albumin (ALB), cholesterol (CHOL), and triglycerides (TG) were assayed within 48?h admission to the hospital. The association between serum CRP concentration and the nutritional status, the stage of the tumor and other factors was analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.
Result: Elevated serum CRP was observed in 47.6% (1,548/3,269) of patients compared with the reference value, and the median CRP concentration was 18.29?mg/l. Patient serum CRP concentrations in the malnourished group (PG-SGA B?+?C) were higher than in the well-nourished (PG-SGA A) patients (P?<?0.05). The serum CRP level was related to the patients' age, gender, tumor stage, and was affected by hepatitis, liver cirrhosis, diabetes, but it has no effect on hypertension. The CRP high patients had lower PA and ALB levels, lower Karnofsky performance status scores, and higher PG-SGA scores (P?<?0.05), and there was no relationship with CHOL and TG levels. Weight loss in the previous 1?mo was seen with CRP positive patients (P?<?0.05).
Conclusion: Almost 50% of malignant tumor patients had elevated serum CRP levels indicating a systemic inflammatory state. The nutritional status was worse in cancer patients with higher concentrations of serum CRP. The level of CRP was associated with the tumor stage, and, as stage is a prognostic factor, so can CRP be used as a prognostic maker in malignant tumors patients. 相似文献