The role of low-grade infection in the pathogenesis of apparently aseptic tibial shaft nonunion

PurposeAim of this study was to determine the rate of low-grade infection in patients with primarily as aseptic categorized tibial shaft nonunion and lack of clinical signs of infection.MethodsIn a retrospective study between 2006 and 2013, all patients who underwent revision surgery for treatment of tibial shaft nonunion without clinical evidence of infection were assessed. Bacterial cultures harvested during nonunion revision, C-reactive protein (CRP) and/or white blood cell (WBC) values at hospital admission, outcome, and epidemiological data were analyzed.ResultsIn 88 patients with tibial shaft nonunion without any clinical signs of infection, bacterial samples remained negative in 51 patients. In 37 patients, microbiological diagnostic studies after long-term culturing demonstrated positive bacterial cultures whereas after short-term culturing for 2 days only 17 positive cultures were observed. In 12 cases a mixed culture with 2.3 different bacteria on average was detected. Among patients with negative bacterial cultures bone healing was achieved after 13.2 months. Nonunion with positive bacterial cultures required 19 (range 2-42) months until osseous healing (p = 0.009). Furthermore, nonunion with positive bacterial cultures require statistically more surgical revisions to achieve healing (2.9 ± 0.5 vs. 1.3 ± 0.1 additional procedure; (p = 0.003). Hematological studies carried out before surgical intervention did not demonstrate significant differences in CRP values (negative vs. positive cultures: 0.3 (range 0.3-2.8) mg/dl vs. 0.5 (range 0.3-5.7) mg/dl (p = 0.181) and in WBC values (negative vs. positive cultures: 7.4 (range 3.5-11.9) /nl vs. 7.3 (range 3.7-11.1) /nl (p = 0.723). Limitations of this study may include the varying amount of the at least four samples for microbiological diagnostics as well as the circumstance that for diagnosing low-grade infection swabs and tissue samples were included in this evaluation as being equivalent.ConclusionThe pathogenesis of nonunion may originate from low-grade infection even in patients without clinical signs of infection. In addition, nonunion with positive bacterial cultures require statistically more surgical revisions to achieve healing. Therefore, during any revision surgery, multiple bacterial samples are intended to be harvested for long-term culturing. Particularly, in tibial shaft nonunion following Gustilo-Anderson type III open fractures, low-grade infection should be suspected.Trial registration numberDRKS00014657.Date of registration04/26/2018 retrospectively registered     

Guidelines for the diagnosis,treatment, prevention and control of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli

The dissemination of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (CRGNB) is a global public health issue. CRGNB isolates are usually extensively drug-resistant or pandrug-resistant, resulting in limited antimicrobial treatment options and high mortality. A multidisciplinary guideline development group covering clinical infectious diseases, clinical microbiology, clinical pharmacology, infection control, and guideline methodology experts jointly developed the present clinical practice guidelines based on best available scientific evidence to address the clinical issues regarding laboratory testing, antimicrobial therapy, and prevention of CRGNB infections. This guideline focuses on carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriales (CRE), carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA). Sixteen clinical questions were proposed from the perspective of current clinical practice and translated into research questions using PICO (population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes) format to collect and synthesize relevant evidence to inform corresponding recommendations. The grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to evaluate the quality of evidence, benefit and risk profile of corresponding interventions and formulate recommendations or suggestions. Evidence extracted from systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was considered preferentially for treatment-related clinical questions. Observational studies, non-controlled studies, and expert opinions were considered as supplementary evidence in the absence of RCTs. The strength of recommendations was classified as strong or conditional (weak). The evidence informing recommendations derives from studies worldwide, while the implementation suggestions combined the Chinese experience. The target audience of this guideline is clinician and related professionals involved in management of infectious diseases.     

Risk factors for postoperative ileus after oblique lateral interbody fusion: a multivariate analysis

Background ContextOblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF)–has become a widely used, efficient surgical tool for various degenerative lumbar conditions. Postoperative ileus (POI) is a relatively common complication after anterior lumbar interbody fusion due to the manipulation of the intestine during the surgical approach. However, to our knowledge, little is known about POI following OLIF even though it also involves bowel manipulation during a surgical procedure.PurposeTo assess the incidence of POI and identify independent risk factors for POI development after OLIF.Study Design/SettingRetrospective cohort study.Patient SampleAll consecutive patients who underwent OLIF and percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation from August 2012 until October 2019 at a single institutionOutcome MeasuresPatient demographics (sex, age, body weight, height, and body mass index), comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, gastroesophageal reflux disease, antithrombotic medication, previous abdominal surgery, and previous lumbar surgery), and perioperative details (preoperative diagnosis, number of levels fused, inadvertent endplate fracture during cage insertion, type of interbody graft, intraoperative estimated blood loss, duration of surgery and anesthesia, the amount of intraoperative remifentanil and propofol used as anesthetic agents, the total postoperative retroperitoneal closed-suction drainage output, and the cumulative opioid dosage administered in the first 72 hours postoperatively).MethodsPOI was defined as 2 or more of the following at 72 hours postoperatively: (1) ongoing nausea or vomiting postoperatively, (2) the absence of flatus over last 24-hour period, (3) inability to tolerate an oral diet over last 24-hour period, (4) ongoing abdominal distention postoperatively, and (5) radiological confirmation. The subjects were divided into 2 groups: patients with POI and those without POI. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed on demographics, comorbidities, and perioperative factors to identify independent risk factors for POI.ResultsEighteen (3.9%) of 460 patients experienced POI after OLIF and percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation. Patients with POI had a significantly longer postoperative length of hospital stay than those without POI (8.61 ± 2.66 vs 6.48 ± 2.64, p = .001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified inadvertent endplate fracture (adjusted odds ratio = 6.017, p = .001) and the amount of intraoperative remifentanil (adjusted odds ratio = 1.057, p = .024) as independent risk factors for the occurrence of POI following OLIF.ConclusionThis study identified inadvertent endplate fracture and the amount of intraoperative remifentanil as independent risk factors for the development of POI after OLIF.     

A clinical calculator for predicting intraoperative blood loss and transfusion risk in spine tumor patients

BACKGROUND CONTEXTSurgery for vertebral column tumors is commonly associated with intraoperative blood loss (IOBL) exceeding 2 liters and the need for transfusion of allogeneic blood products. Transfusion of allogeneic blood, while necessary, is not benign, and has been associated with increased rates of wound complication, venous thromboembolism, delirium, and death.PURPOSETo develop a prediction tool capable of predicting IOBL and risk of requiring allogeneic transfusion in patients undergoing surgery for vertebral column tumors.STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGRetrospective, single-center study.PATIENT SAMPLEConsecutive series of 274 patients undergoing 350 unique operations for primary or metastatic spinal column tumors over a 46-month period at a comprehensive cancer centerOUTCOME MEASURESIOBL (in mL), use of intraoperative blood products, and intraoperative blood products transfused.METHODSWe identified IOBL and transfusions, along with demographic data, preoperative laboratory data, and surgical procedures performed. Independent predictors of IOBL and transfusion risk were identified using multivariable regression.RESULTSMean age at surgery was 57.0±13.6 years, 53.1% were male, and 67.1% were treated for metastatic lesions. Independent predictors of IOBL included en bloc resection (p<.001), surgical invasiveness (β=25.43 per point; p<0.001), and preoperative albumin (β=?244.86 per g/dL; p=0.011). Predictors of transfusion risk included preoperative hematocrit (odds ratio [OR]=0.88 per %; 95% confidence interval [CI, 0.84, 0.93]; p<0.001), preoperative MCHgb (OR=0.88 per pg; 95% CI [0.78, 1.00]; p=0.048), preoperative red cell distribution width (OR=1.32 per %; 95% CI [1.13, 1.55]; p<0.001), en bloc resection (OR=3.17; 95%CI [1.33, 7.54]; p=0.009), and surgical invasiveness (OR=1.08 per point; [1.06; 1.11]; p<0.001). The transfusion model showed a good fit of the data with an optimism-corrected area under the curve of 0.819. A freely available, web-based calculator was developed for the transfusion risk model (https://jhuspine3.shinyapps.io/TRUST/).CONCLUSIONSHere we present the first clinical calculator for intraoperative blood loss and transfusion risk in patients being treated for primary or metastatic vertebral column tumors. Surgical invasiveness and preoperative microcytic anemia most strongly predict transfusion risk. The resultant calculators may prove clinically useful for surgeons counseling patients about their individual risk of requiring allogeneic transfusion.     

Representative dynamic ranges of spinal alignment during gait in patients with mild and severe adult spinal deformities

BACKGROUND CONTEXTSurgical correction strategies for adult spinal deformity (ASD) relies heavily on radiographic alignment goals, however, there is often debate regarding degree of correction and how static alignment translates to physical ability in daily life. Kinematic analysis has the potential to improve the concept of ideal spinal alignment by providing clinically meaningful estimates of dynamic changes in spinal alignment during activities of daily life.PURPOSEEstimate representative dynamic ranges of spinal alignment during gait among ASD patients using 3D motion tracking; compare dynamic alignment between mild and severe deformity patients and to healthy adults.STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGRetrospective review at a single institution.PATIENT SAMPLEFifty-two ASD patients and 46 healthy adults.OUTCOME MEASURESRadiographic alignment, kinematic spine motion, spatiotemporal gait measures, patient reported outcomes (VAS pain, ODI, SRS-22r).METHODSSpinal alignment was assessed radiographically and during standing and overground walking tests. Dynamic alignment was initialized by linking radiographic alignment to kinematic alignment during standing and at initial heel contact during gait. Dynamic changes in maximums and minimums during gait were made relative to initial heel contact for each gait cycle. Total range-of-motion (RoM) was measured for both ASD and healthy subjects. Dynamic alignment measures included coronal and sagittal vertical axes (CVA, SVA), T1 pelvic angle (TPA), lumbar lordosis (LL), and pelvic tilt (PT). ASD patient's deformities were classified as either Mild or Severe based on the SRS-Schwab ASD classification.RESULTSSevere ASD patients had significantly larger dynamic maximum and minimums for SVA, TPA, LL, and PT (all p<.05) compared with Mild ASD patients. ASD patients exhibited little difference in dynamic alignment compared with healthy subjects. Only PT had a significant difference in dynamic RoM compared with healthy (p<.001).CONCLUSIONSMild and Severe ASD patients exhibited similar global dynamic alignment measures during gait and had comparable RoM to healthy subjects except with greater PT and reduced spatiotemporal performance which may be key compensatory mechanisms for dynamic stabilization.     

Relationships between anthropometric adiposity indexes and bone mineral density in a cross-sectional Chinese study

Background ContextPrevious studies have reported conflicting results for the relationships between anthropometric adiposity indexes and bone mineral density, based on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). However, few studies were published based on quantitative computed tomography (QCT), especially for Chinese population.PurposeTo evaluate the associations of spine bone mineral density (BMD) with body mass index (BMI), waist circumstance (WC), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) and a body shape index (ABSI) using QCT.Study Design/SettingA Cross-sectional study.Patient SampleAround 3,457 participants in multiple communities across 7 administrative regions of China.Outcome MeasuresSpine BMD was measured using QCT, and the classification of osteoporosis was defined as follows: 1) osteoporosis if BMD <80mg/cm³, 2) osteopenia if BMD 80–119 mg/cm³, and 3) normal bone mass if BMD≥120 mg/cm³.MethodsThis study was conducted using convenient sampling between 2013 and 2017. Multivariable linear regression model and logistic regression models were used for the associations of continuous and categorical BMD, respectively.ResultsAround 3,405 participants were included in the final analyses, including 1,272 males and 2,133 females, with spine BMD of 111.00±35.47 mg/cm³ and 99.38±40.60 mg/cm³, respectively. Spine BMD decreased significantly with the increase of ABSI in females (adjusted β, ?5.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], ?8.50 to ?2.98), and this trend also was kept in females aged at less than 60 years (adjusted β, ?14.54; 95% CI, ?20.40 to ?8.68), and females with age ≥60 years (adjusted β, ?7.59; 95% CI, ?10.91 to ?4.28). However, this inverse association was observed only in males with age ≥ 60 years (adjusted β, ?5.19; 95% CI, ?10.08 to ?0.29). Except ABSI, negative associations of Spine BMD with WC (adjusted β, ?0.46; 95% CI, ?0.77 to ?0.15), WHR (adjusted β, ?6.25; 95% CI, ?10.63 to ?1.86), WHtR (adjusted β, ?6.80; 95% CI, ?11.63 to ?1.97) were shown in females aged at <60 years, and positive association with BMI in males with age ≥60 years (adjusted β, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.29–1.55).ConclusionsABSI had more remarkable association with spine BMD, compared with the other four indexes.     

肠-菌-肝轴及其在肠衰竭相关性肝损害发生发展中的作用

由于长期的肠道摄入不足,肠衰竭患者不得不依赖肠外营养(PN)来维持能量和正常的生理需求。然而PN在提供能量及营养物质的同时,也会引起肝脏损害。此外,由于肠道结构和内环境发生改变,IF患者往往伴随着肠道菌群失调及小肠细菌过度生长,过度生长的细菌代谢产生的毒性介质可诱导肠道炎性反应和胆汁酸代谢紊乱,最终导致肠黏膜屏障功能受损及肠衰竭相关性肝损害(IFALD)。自1998年Marshall首次提出肠-肝轴的概念以来,肠-肝轴紊乱在IFALD发生发展中的作用也备受关注。肠道-肝脏之间的"对话"是维持肝脏代谢和肠道内稳态平衡的关键,二者相互作用,互为因果。然而,作为一个"被遗忘的器官",肠道菌群在IFALD发病过程中的作用并没有得到很好的体现。因此,笔者首次提出肠-菌-肝轴这样一个全新的概念,试图强调肠道菌群是肠-肝轴中的重要一环,三者之间的相互作用在IF患者肠道和肝脏损害过程中扮演着重要的角色。对肠-菌-肝轴这一概念的理解和深入研究,将对理解IFALD的发病机制和改进防治措施具有重要意义。