Effects of Administration Route of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells on the Survival of Allogeneic Skin Grafts in Mice

BackgroundComposite tissue allotransplantation presents considerable potential for defective tissue reconstruction. However, the high immunogenicity of the allogeneic skin grafts can cause acute rejection. Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) reportedly have an immunomodulation potential, which may improve the survival of allogeneic skin grafts. However, there is currently no consensus on administration route of ADSCs. This study compared the effectiveness of local injection vs intravenous (IV) administration of ADSCs in improving the survival of allogenic skin grafts in mice.MethodsBALB/c and C57BL/6 mice were used as skin graft donors and recipients, respectively. Mice were divided into 3 groups for IV injection of ADSCs (IV group) or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; control), or for local injection in the fascial layer of the recipient bed (FL group). After allogeneic skin transplantation, 0.1 mL of PBS alone or with 1.5 × 10⁵ ADSCs was immediately injected. The grafts were histologically evaluated on days 7 and 14 postoperation.ResultsThe graft necrotic area was significantly smaller in the IV and FL groups than in the control group. Additionally, the grafts in these 2 groups exhibited decreased interleukin 17/6, tumor necrosis factor-α, and interferon-γ messenger mRNA levels; inflammatory changes; and cluster of differentiation 4 expression, and increased expression of vascular endothelial growth factor expression (P < .05). However, these 2 groups did not significantly differ (P > .05).ConclusionsADSCs increased the survival of allogeneic skin grafts in mice regardless of IV or FL route of administration, and this effect is likely through anti-inflammatory and angiogenic effects of ADSCs.     

Prognostication of critically ill patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure using the Chronic Liver Failure–Sequential Organ Failure Assessment: A Canadian retrospective study

PurposeWe evaluated the Chronic Liver Failure–Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (CLIF-SOFA) score to predict survival in a Canadian critically ill cohort with acute-on-chronic liver failure.MethodsWe retrospectively examined 274 acute-on-chronic liver failure patients admitted to a quaternary level intensive care unit (ICU) between April 1, 2000, and April 30, 2011. We evaluated severity of illness scores, including the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP), SOFA, and CLIF-SOFA.ResultsOn ICU admission, patients had the following median (interquartile range): APACHE II, 23 (19-28); MELD, 26 (19-35); CTP, 12 (10-13); SOFA, 15 (11-18); and CLIF-SOFA, 17 (13-21). In-hospital survival was 40%. There were no significant differences in survival for cirrhosis etiology, reason, or year of admission. The CLIF-SOFA score had the greatest area under receiver operating curve of 0.865 (95% confidence interval, 0.820-0.909) and outperformed the CTP, MELD, SOFA, and APACHE II scores. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score performance improved on the third day of ICU admission (area under receiver operating curve, 0.935; 95% confidence interval, 0.895-0.975).ConclusionsThe CLIF-SOFA and SOFA scores during the first 3 days of ICU admission appear to be highly predictive of in-hospital mortality.     

Is failure to awaken and wean malpractice?

BackgroundRespiratory failure is among the most common primary causes of or complications of critical illness, and although mechanical ventilation can be lifesaving, it also engenders substantial risk of morbidity and mortality to patients. Three decades of research suggests that the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation can be reduced substantially, reducing morbidity and mortality. Mean duration of ventilation reported in recent international studies suggests a quality chasm in management of this common critical illness.MethodsThis is a selective review of the literature and synthesis with precepts of medical professionalism and ethics.ConclusionsTo the extent that daily wake-up-and-breathe reduces morbidity, mortality, and length of stay, failure to deploy this strategy is, by definition, malpractice (ie, poor practice). Practical measures are offered to close this quality chasm.