Anastomotic leak after oesophagectomy and stent implantation: a systematic review

Anastomotic leaks following oesophageal cancer resection have a high mortality. Stents have an established position in the palliation of dysphagia due to malignancy and in treating malignant perforation or fistula. They are increasingly used for benign conditions such as spontaneous oesophageal perforation with encouraging results. In this systematic review we examine the available evidence and attempt to define the role of stents in the management of oesophageal anastomotic leaks after resection for cancer. It is evident from the review that plastic- and metal-covered stents are an effective strategy for the treatment of anastomotic leaks. Vigilance is required as complications such as stent migration and incomplete sealing are not uncommon. Further clinical studies with greater methodological rigor in terms of sample size and study design may confirm that stents have an important contribution to make in the management of oesophageal anastomotic leak.     

Laparoscopic cholecystostomy for acute acalculous cholecystitis

Acute acalculous cholecystitis (AAC) can occur in up to 18% of severely injured patients. Diagnosis is made by positive ultrasound findings of gallbladder sludge, hydrox, and wall thickening. There may also be recent-onset jaundice, positive ultrasound induced Murphy's sign, and unexplained sepsis. Mortality can be as high as 50%. Laparoscopic confirmation was obtained in six ICU trauma patients when omentum was drawn up over a distended gallbladder. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was done by first directly decompressing the gallbladder through the fundus. This trocar was replaced by a 16 French Foley catheter passed through an Endoloop into the gallbladder and secured by tightening the loop around a cuff of gallbladder. Sepsis resolved in all cases. Only one required subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. LC has a low morbidity and may be life saving during the early stages of AAC. It is not indicated in gangrene or perforation of the gallbladder.     

Laparoscopic bilateral adrenalectomy following failed hypophysectomy

Background: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy has recently been shown to be a safe and effective means of treating adrenal pathology with much lower morbidity than the traditional approach. The majority of reports in the literature involve removal of adrenal tumors. Although open bilateral adrenalectomy has been utilized for persistent Cushing's syndrome following attempted hypophysectomy, there is little data available describing the application of laparoscopic adrenal surgery to this problem. Methods: Four patients with persistent Cushing's syndrome after attempted treatment with hypophysectomy underwent laparoscopic bilateral adrenalectomy at our institution. One procedure was done transabdominally in the supine position. Three procedures were done transabdominally using sequential lateral decubitus positions. Results: All procedures were completed laparoscopically. The mean operative time was 4.6 h (range 3.9–5.25). Repositioning and reprepping the patients resulted in a slight increase in operative time, but visualization was improved using the lateral decubitus position. Average blood loss: 156 cc (range 50–300). One patient required early reoperation for bleeding from the left adrenal bed, which was controlled laparoscopically. Three patients were eating the following day and were discharged on postoperative days 1, 2, and 5. The fourth patient remained hospitalized for 18 days due to problems unrelated to surgery. After a mean follow-up of 10 months, all patients have done well and have no clinical or biochemical evidence of recurrent disease. Conclusion: Our clinical experience indicates that laparoscopic bilateral adrenalectomy is a viable treatment option for Cushing's syndrome following failed hypophysectomy. Received: 29 March 1996/Accepted: 12 June 1996     

The association of Hospital Medicare beneficiary payer-mix,national quality rankings and outcomes following hepatopancreatic surgery

IntroductionWe sought to determine the impact of payer-mix on post-operative outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries following hepatopancreatic surgery.MethodsMedicare beneficiaries who underwent hepatopancreatic surgery were identified. Hospital quality markers were obtained from the Hospital General Information dataset. Hospitals were dichotomized (low/average vs. high) based on Medicare patient days versus all patient days irrespective of payer type.ResultsHigh Medicare patient-mix hospitals were more likely to be ranked higher than the national average relative to safety of care (29.4% vs. 38.1%) and timeliness of care (15.4% vs. 26.3%) versus low burden Medicare hospitals (both p < 0.001). However, Medicare beneficiaries who had hepatopancreatic surgery at a high Medicare patient-mix hospital were at higher risk of a complication (OR = 1.13, 95%CI 1.04–1.22), and death within 30-days (OR = 1.37, 95%CI 1.23–1.53) following surgery.ConclusionWhile hospitals caring for higher numbers of Medicare beneficiaries generally performed better on CMS quality indicators, these rankings did not equate to improved post-operative outcomes.     

Positive microscopic surgical margins: Is there an association with survival in resected small gastrointestinal stromal tumors?

BackgroundFew studies evaluate the relationships between surgical approach, histologic margin, and overall survival in gastrointestinal stromal tumor. We test the hypothesis that margin positive resection is associated with compromised overall survival.MethodsWe queried the National Cancer Data Base to identify patients undergoing resections for gastrointestinal stromal tumors ≤3 cm in size between 2010 and 2015. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with positive microscopic margins on final pathology. Cox proportional hazard methods were used to evaluate factors associated with overall survival.Results2064 patients met inclusion criteria; 135 (6.5%) had a microscopically positive surgical margin. On multivariable regression, minimally invasive approach was not associated with risk of a positive margin (OR 1.06 95% CI [0.71, 1.59]). On Cox analysis, positive margin status was not associated with OS (R1: 1.03, CI [0.46–2.31], reference R0).ConclusionsPositive microscopic surgical margins are not associated with compromised overall survival in patients undergoing resection of small gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Minimally invasive surgical approaches do not compromise oncologic outcomes in these cases.     

A novel predictive model for pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with penile cancer: A multi-institutional study

PurposeWe determined whether a clinicopathological nomogram is able to predict the risk of pelvic lymph node metastasis (LNM) in penile cancer patients after inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND).MethodsNinety-eight patients with bilateral ILND who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy at 10 centers were retrospectively analyzed. The most predictive features in the nomogram were selected by the stepwise logistic regression method and then tested and verified by multivariate logistic regression analyses. The nomogram was assessed using concordance indices and calibration curves.ResultsOf the 181 pelvic basins, pelvic LNM was observed in 52 packages (43 patients). Bilateral pelvic LNM was present in 9 patients (9/43, 20.9%). There was no crossover metastatic spread from one inguinal side to the other pelvic side. Age, previous resection, the biopsy procedure for inguinal lymph nodes, vascular invasion, and ipsilateral inguinal lymph node status were all independent risk factors for pelvic LNM (all P < 0.05) in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. The nomogram exhibited a good probability for survival agreement, with a concordance index of 0.868 (95% CI: 0.813–0.922).ConclusionsA novel nomogram suggests that the risk of pelvic LNM can be effectively predicted in penile carcinoma patients and may provide a useful guide for clinicians. Further external validation is needed.     

Differences in the outcomes of scrotal vs. lateral vs. medial inguinal hernias: a multivariable analysis of registry data

Hernia - There are hardly any studies on the outcome of scrotal compared with medial and lateral inguinal hernias. Therefore, this present multivariable analysis of data from the Herniamed Registry...