首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   1883篇
  免费   254篇
  国内免费   22篇
耳鼻咽喉   13篇
儿科学   62篇
妇产科学   27篇
基础医学   127篇
口腔科学   74篇
临床医学   278篇
内科学   502篇
皮肤病学   40篇
神经病学   86篇
特种医学   303篇
外科学   186篇
综合类   28篇
预防医学   290篇
眼科学   11篇
药学   35篇
肿瘤学   97篇
  2023年   54篇
  2022年   19篇
  2021年   21篇
  2020年   40篇
  2019年   19篇
  2018年   53篇
  2017年   35篇
  2016年   46篇
  2015年   54篇
  2014年   100篇
  2013年   125篇
  2012年   40篇
  2011年   64篇
  2010年   71篇
  2009年   90篇
  2008年   60篇
  2007年   89篇
  2006年   60篇
  2005年   43篇
  2004年   50篇
  2003年   21篇
  2002年   15篇
  2001年   33篇
  2000年   30篇
  1999年   39篇
  1998年   71篇
  1997年   94篇
  1996年   80篇
  1995年   58篇
  1994年   63篇
  1993年   54篇
  1992年   22篇
  1991年   15篇
  1990年   35篇
  1989年   45篇
  1988年   41篇
  1987年   40篇
  1986年   37篇
  1985年   38篇
  1984年   17篇
  1983年   20篇
  1982年   25篇
  1981年   31篇
  1980年   19篇
  1979年   9篇
  1978年   5篇
  1977年   15篇
  1976年   14篇
  1975年   12篇
  1973年   5篇
排序方式: 共有2159条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
991.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) will expand coverage of mental health and substance use disorder benefits and federal parity protections to over 60 million Americans. The key to this expansion is the essential health benefit provision in the ACA that requires coverage of mental health and substance use disorder services at parity with general medical benefits. Other ACA provisions that should improve access to treatment include requirements on network adequacy, dependent coverage up to age 26, preventive services, and prohibitions on annual and lifetime limits and preexisting exclusions. The ACA offers states flexibility in expanding Medicaid (primarily to childless adults, not generally eligible previously) to cover supportive services needed by those with significant behavioral health conditions in addition to basic benefits at parity. Through these various new requirements, the ACA in conjunction with Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) will expand coverage of behavioral health care by historic proportions.  相似文献   
992.
PurposeThe diagnostic value of examinations performed with the use of pocket-size echocardiograph by medical professionals with different levels of experience remains to be determined. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of bedside echocardiographic examinations performed with the use of pocket-size echocardiograph by experienced cardiologist and medical students.Material/MethodsThe study group comprised 90 patients (63 men, 27 women; mean age 64±14 years) admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit and 30 patients from an out-patient clinic (21 men, 9 women; mean age 62±17 years). All patients underwent bedside echocardiographic examination performed with pocket-size echocardiograph by two briefly trained medical students (n= 90 patients) or cardiologist (n=30 patients). Major findings were recorded using a simplified questionnaire. Within 24 hours standard echocardiographic examination was performed in all patients by another cardiologist using a full sized echocardiograph.The study group was divided into 4 subgroups: A / B – first / second half of in-patients examined by students, group C – in-patients examined by cardiologist, group D- out-patients examined by students.ResultsThe agreement between standard transthoracic echocardiography (sTTE) and major findings on bedside transthoracic echocardiography (bTTE) was fair to moderate (kappa 0.293–0.57) in group A, moderate to very good (kappa 0.535–1.00) in group B, good to very good (kappa 0.734–1.00) in group C and moderate to very good (kappa 0.590–1.00) in group D.ConclusionsPocket-size echocardiograph enables an expert echocardiographer to perform reliable bedside examinations. When used by briefly trained medical students it provides an acceptable diagnostic value with notable learning curve effect.  相似文献   
993.
994.
Survey data suggest that many people fear genetic discrimination by health insurers or employers. In fact, such discrimination has not yet been a significant problem. This article examines the fear and reality of genetic discrimination in the United States, describes how Congress sought to prohibit such discrimination by passing the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA), and explores the implications of GINA for general internists and their institutions. It concludes that medical providers and health care institutions must be familiar with the general intent and specific terms of GINA, and should continue to collect genetic information that can contribute to the high quality provision of medical treatment. Not doing so violates their medical mission and diminishes the quality of care patients deserve.  相似文献   
995.
996.
997.
998.
999.
1000.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号