阿德福韦双酯治疗拉米夫定耐药的慢性乙肝患者时出现的耐药问题

背景:阿德福韦双酯(ADV) 是一种有效治疗野生型和耐拉米夫定乙肝病毒(HBV)的核苷酸类药物。在使用核苷酸类药物治疗慢性乙肝时,当治疗时间为 48、96、144周时,耐ADV变异体出现的累积发生率分别为0、 0．8-3％和0-5．9％。目的:研究67例对拉米夫定耐药且接受ADV治疗的慢性乙肝患者耐ADV病毒变异体的表型和基因型特点。方法:HBV DNA含量采用实时定量PCR技术。ADV变异体检测采用基质辅助激光解吸电离／飞行时间质谱为基础的基因分型     

Characterization of familial Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia.

BackgroundFamilial clustering of B-cell disorders among Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) patients has been reported, though the frequency and any differences in disease manifestation for familial patients remain to be defined.Patients and methodsWe therefore analyzed clinicopathological data from 257 consecutive and unrelated WM patients. Forty-eight (18.7%) patients had at least one first-degree relative with either WM (n = 13, 5.1%), or another B-cell disorder including non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 9, 3.5%), myeloma (n = 8, 3.1%), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n = 7, 2.7%), monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance (n = 5, 1.9%), acute lymphocytic leukemia (n = 3, 1.2%) and Hodgkin's disease (n = 3, 1.2%). Patients with a familial history of WM or a plasma cell disorder (PCD) were diagnosed at a younger age and with greater bone marrow involvement.ResultsDeletions in 6q represented the only recurrent structural chromosomal abnormality and were found in 13% of patients, all non-familial cases. Interphase FISH analysis demonstrated deletions in 6q21-22.1 in nearly half of patients, irrespective of familial background.ConclusionsThe above results suggest a high degree of clustering for B-cell disorders among first-degree relatives of patients with WM, along with distinct clinical features at presentation based on familial disease cluster patterns. Genomic studies to delineate genetic predisposition to WM are underway.     

Immunotherapeutic strategies for the treatment of plasma cell malignancies

The use of immunotherapy to treat patients with plasma cell dyscrasias (PCD) such as multiple myeloma (MM) and Waldenstr?m's macroglobulinemia (WM) has gained enormous interest in recent years, with considerable efforts being mounted by many investigators. These efforts have included the use of serotherapy (antibody-mediated immunotherapy), vaccination strategies aimed at inducing allogeneic as well as autologous anti-MM immunity, and the use of donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs). A number of cell surface antigens on malignant plasma cells and/or B cells in MM and/or WM patients have been proposed for use in tumor cell-targeted serotherapy, including immunoglobulin idiotype, CD19, CD20, CD38, CD54, CD138, HM1.24, and MUC1 core protein. Ongoing clinical trials are examining serotherapy targeting CD20 (in MM and WM) and CD38 (in MM), with early reports of responses to the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) Rituximab (Genentech, South San Francisco, CA) in patients with WM and certain patients with MM. The use of agents to induce MM- and WM-selective antigens for targeting in serotherapy has been proposed based on studies demonstrating the upregulation of CD20 by interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), and of MUC1 core protein by dexamethasone (DEX) on malignant plasma cells. Strategies to induce allogeneic anti-MM immunity have included immunization of the marrow donor to idiotypic protein, as well as DLI. In addition, proposed immunization strategies aimed at inducing autologous immunity include vaccination with dendritic cells pulsed with MM antigens, MM cell-dendritic cell fusions, carrier-linked idiotype protein, catalytic subunit of telomerase, or DNA encoding for single-chain variable fragments (scFv) linked to a carrier protein gene. Whole tumor vaccination strategies are also being examined and include the use of MM cells transfected and/or stimulated with cytokines, costimulatory molecules, or CD40 ligand. Finally, potential obstacles to the use of immunotherapy, including the presence of resistance antigens on MM and WM tumor cells, are discussed.     

CD5, CD10, and CD23 expression in Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia

CD5, CD10, and CD23 are cell surface antigens used to distinguish B-cell disorders. The expression of these antigens and their clinical significance in Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM), an uncommon B-cell disorder, remains to be clarified. We therefore determined expression of CD5, CD10, and CD23 by flow cytometric analysis on bone marrow lymphoplasmacytic cells (CD19+ k/l light chain restricted) for 171 serially biopsied patients with findings of the consensus panel definition of WM. Importantly, we also correlated laboratory and clinical data, as well as existence of a familial history of a B-cell disorder in view of reports suggesting familial predisposition in WM. These studies demonstrated tumor cell expression of CD5, CD10, and CD23 in 15 of 171 patients (9%), 11 of 161 patients (7%), and 37 of 105 patients (35%), respectively. Coexpression of CD23 with CD5 or CD10 was common. Tumor Lymphoplasmacytic from 10 of 15 (66%) and 3 of 11 (27%) patients with WM that expressed CD5 and CD10, respectively, also showed expression of CD23 (P = 0.01 and P = 0.08, respectively). Among patients with CD23 expression, increased serum immunoglobulin (Ig) M levels were observed compared with patients without CD23 expression (P = 0.05). No differences in age at diagnosis; presence of adenopathy and/or splenomegaly; bone marrow involvement; serum IgA, IgB, and b2 macroglobulin levels; hematocrit; platelet count; or familial history of WM or a related B-cell disorder were observed among patients with and without CD5, CD10, and CD23 expression. These studies demonstrate that CD5, CD10, and CD23 are commonly found in WM and that their expression should not exclude the diagnosis of WM. Moreover, expression of CD23 may define a clinically distinct subset of patients with WM.     

Treatment of Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis with Fluconazole and Itraconazole

Treatment of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) has remained both problematic as well as controversial. Although the sheet anchor in treatment of ABPA still remains steroids, various workers have tried oral antifungals (fluconazole and itraconazole) with encouraging results. This study evaluates the effect of fluconazole or itraconazole in the treatment of ABPA patients and compares them with the patients who had received palliative therapy other than antifungals. Case records of 44 proven cases of ABPA treated at our referral service hospital during February 1998 to April 2001 were analyzed. In addition to oral and inhaled bronchodilators, 16 patients received fluconazole 150 mg OD and 13 patients itraconazole 200 mg OD for six months. Response to therapy was assessed clinically, radiologically and by spirometry every 3 months. Patients who did not receive antifungals had chronic course characterized by airway obstruction, recurrent pulmonary consolidation and obstructive defect on pulmonary function test (PFT). Patients treated with itraconazole had better control of asthma symptoms, less requirement of reliever inhalers, steroids and lesser exacerbations of asthma during follow-up even after stopping antifungal. Fluconazole group had better control of symptoms but improvement in other parameters was not statistically significant. From this study it was evident that itraconazole improved the symptoms of airway obstruction, pulmonary functions, pulmonary opacities and decreased exacerbations during follow up.Key Words: Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, Fluconazole, Itraconazole     

CD20-directed serotherapy in patients with multiple myeloma: biologic considerations and therapeutic applications

Clonotypic B cells circulating in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) express CD20, and it has been suggested that these cells may be clonogenic. Furthermore, 20% of patients with MM express CD20 on their bone marrow plasma cells (BMPCs). Therefore, the authors began a phase II clinical study to determine the activity of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab in MM patients. Nineteen previously treated MM patients received 375 mg/m2 rituximab per week for 4 weeks. Three months after initiation of treatment, patients were assessed for response and received a second course of therapy if their disease was stable (SD) or they achieved a partial response (PR). Six of 19 (32%) patients had either a PR (n = 1) or SD (n = 5), with a median time to treatment failure of 5.5 months (mean, 10.3 months; range, 3-27+ months). All six patients who had a PR or SD had CD20+ BMPC. Overall, rituximab therapy was well tolerated. Because most patients with MM poorly express CD20 on their BMPCs, the authors evaluated agents for their ability to induce CD20 expression and thereby facilitate rituximab binding on MM cells. These studies show that interferon-gamma (IFN-y) induced CD20 expression on MM BMPCs, MM B cells, and healthy donor BMPCs. In contrast, CD20 expression on chronic lymphocytic leukemia, follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, healthy donor B cells, and progenitor cells was unaffected by IFN-y. Rituximab binding to the BMPCs of MM patients was also increased after culture with pharmacologically attainable levels of IFN-gamma (1-100 U/mL). In conclusion, these studies suggest that MM patients with CD20+ BMPCs may benefit from rituximab therapy. Furthermore, IFN-gamma induces CD20 expression on MM BMPCs and B cells and facilitates rituximab binding to MM BMPCs, providing the rationale for clinical trials to examine its use with CD20-directed serotherapies in MM.