Retraction-Related Acute Liver Failure after Urological Laparoscopic Surgery

Liver retraction is necessary for optimal exposure during laparoscopic right renal surgery. We described a patient who developed fulminant liver failure as a result of liver retractor-induced excessive ischemic changes in the right lobe of the liver. A 37-year-old male underwent a right side laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. At the beginning of the operation, a small snake retractor was placed through a 5-mm port under direct vision. The liver was lifted in the appropriate direction to optimize exposure by using the laparoscope holder. The operation was prolonged. However, we achieved significant improvements in the efficiency of liver retraction using the holder. On the first postoperative day, the patient''s serum levels of GOT, GPT and LDH had remarkably increased. A computerized tomogram confirmed the presence of excessive ischemic changes of the right lobe of the liver. Our method which used a laparoscope holder device for liver retraction maintained a better surgical field. However, neglecting to make minor adjustments to the positioning of the retractor can cause significant pressure on the liver parenchyma in a single area. As surgical procedures increase in complexity, the surgeon should keep these potential side effects in mind and shift the retraction point at regular intervals. In this report, we discussed various types of retractor-related liver injuries and their management, and highlighted the importance of intermittent release of retraction during prolonged surgery.Key Words: Laparoscopic surgery, Liver injury, Retractor, Acute liver failure     

Identification of an Anti–Integrin αvβ6 Autoantibody in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis

1. Download : Download high-res image (160KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Central Bisegmentectomy for Malignant Liver Tumors: Experience in 8 Patients

Central bisegmentectomy (CBS) of the liver is an en bloc hepatic resection of Couiaud segments 4, 5, and 8. The indications for CBS include benign and malignant tumors occupying both the left medial and right anterior segments. However, CBS has rarely been reported. Here, we investigate CBS in patients with suboptimal liver function for whom an extended lobectomy is not an optimal solution. Each case was 1 of 8 patients who underwent CBS for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) at the Department of Surgery, Jikei University Hospital. Indications for CBS consisted of CRLM in 3 patients and HCC in 5 patients. The median duration of operation was 552 minutes, and median blood loss was 2263 g. No postoperative nor in-hospital mortalities occurred. In this study, 1-, 2-, and 3-year disease-free survival rates were 62.5%, 12.5%, and 12.5%, respectively, and 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates were 100%, 100%, and 85.7%, respectively. CBS is advocated for central liver tumors in patients with suboptimal liver function for whom extended lobectomy could result in less than optimal remnant liver volume and function.Key words: Central bisegmentectomy, Colorectal cancer liver metastasis, Hepatocellular carcinomaCentral bisegmentectomy (CBS) of the liver is an en bloc hepatic resection of Couiaud segments 4, 5, and 8.¹ McBride and Wallace² first reported this procedure in 1972. The indications for CBS include benign and malignant tumors occupying both the left medial and right anterior segments. The traditional procedure for such tumors is extended right or left lobectomy or trisegmentectomy. Because of the possibility of conservation of remnant liver parenchymal volume, CBS may be superior to extended lobectomy or trisegmentectomy, especially for patients with low residual liver function due to viral hepatitis or adjuvant chemotherapy. However, CBS has rarely been reported. We herein report our experience with 8 patients who underwent CBS for colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).