The stimulant effect of modafinil on wakefulness is not associated with an increase in anxiety in mice

Modafinil is a new drug used in the treatment of narcolepsy. Its administration in mice induced a dose-dependent increase in locomotor activity. The effects of modafinil were compared with those of dexamphetamine on three tests that assessed the anxiety level (drugs were used at doses which induced a roughly similar stimulation of locomotor activity). Dexamphetamine increased the latency of exploration of a white compartment, increased thigmotaxis in an open-field and decreased the time spent in the open arms of an elevated plus-maze. None of these responses was significantly modified by modafinil. We conclude that modafinil does not share the anxiogenic effects of dexamphetamine.     

Meniscal transplantation using fresh and cryopreserved allografts. An experimental study in goats.

A comparative study of three subgroups of meniscal transplants was undertaken in the goat model: Group 1 (autograft) involved removal and immediate reimplantation of the meniscus; Group 2, fresh meniscal allografts; and Group 3, cryopreserved (30 days) meniscal allografts. Six months after surgery, tissues were evaluated for gross degenerative changes, proteoglycan concentration (as assessed by uronic acid), water content, vascularity, histology, and cell viability. The contralateral knee served as control for all comparisons. There was no statistical difference in the amount of arthritis present and all transplants demonstrated an essentially normal peripheral vascularity compared to controls. Sections revealed reduced numbers of cells in the central portions of the transplanted menisci and these viable cells demonstrated different behavior in multiplication in tissue culture compared to contralateral controls. Grossly and microscopically, the implanted menisci differed little from the controls. The measurement of proteoglycan concentration and water content of the transplanted meniscal cartilage suggest alterations that may affect the long-term mechanical properties. The autograft specimens showed the water content was very slightly increased (3% to 6%), while the proteoglycan concentration was increased (42% in terms of uronic acid). In contrast, the water content of the fresh allograft group and the cryopreserved group was increased 12% to 24%. Proteoglycan concentration in these groups was decreased up to 56% in portions of some menisci compared to controls. Fresh and cryopreserved meniscal allografts showed peripheral healing, revascularization, cellularity, and incorporation, and grossly appeared good at 6 months in the goat model. The biochemical changes in the extracellular matrix at 6 months raises questions on the long-term function of these transplanted menisci.     

Sonographic characteristics of epidermoidcyst of testicle

The ultrasonographic characteristics of an epidermoid cyst of the testicle are presented. Since these, findings are similar to other published case reports, preoperative sonographic diagnosis of this lagon may be possible.     

The Future of Clinical Psychology: Board Certification

The present article presents the future of clinical psychology board certification. With the increasing specialization in the field of professional psychology and the generic nature of state licensure, clinical psychology as a specialty will develop into a specialty area in a similar fashion as have specialties in medicine. A brief history of board certification in professional psychology by the American Board of Professional Psychology is reviewed and the process of becoming board certified in either clinical psychology or clinical child and adolescent psychology is discussed.     

Intraligamentous injection of sclerosing solutions (prolotherapy) for spinal pain: a critical review of the literature.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The injection of various solutions aimed at producing a sclerosing effect has been used to treat soft tissues injuries (eg, inguinal hernia) for more than 100 years. In the 1930s, this treatment approach was applied to injured joints in an attempt to stimulate connective tissue repair. Although several studies have been published about this method of treatment for various orthopedic and spinal indications (termed prolotherapy), its use remains controversial. PURPOSE: To conduct a critical review of the literature on prolotherapy for spinal pain. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Critical review of the literature. METHODS: Computerized medical literature databases (Medline, CINAHL, Mantis, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched to uncover all published information about the use of sclerosing injections in humans with spinal pain disorders. Search results were reviewed for relevance, and information was abstracted from full-text articles. RESULTS: Our search uncovered almost 200 reference materials in various media related to prolotherapy, including 31 clinical studies related to spinal pain. There were 26 observational cohorts and 5 randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Indications in these studies were low back pain (22), neck pain (3), cervical headaches (3) and dorsal or thoracic pain (3). A total of 20 sclerosing solutions were used in these studies; the most common was a mixture of dextrose 12.5%, glycerin 12.5%, phenol 1.25% and lidocaine 0.25%. Wide variations were found in treatment protocols, such as dose, number of treatments and use of adjunct therapies. Most cohort studies were only of moderate quality and varied greatly in the substances injected and the use of co-interventions. Most clinical studies reported positive results such as decreased pain or disability, although differences between treatment and control groups did not always reach statistical significance. Commonly reported adverse reactions to this treatment include temporary postinjection pain and stiffness. A handful of more serious adverse events were reported in the 1950s and 1960s with stronger or unknown solutions. CONCLUSION: Prolotherapy describes a variety of treatment approaches rather than a specific protocol. Results from clinical studies published to date indicate that it may be effective at reducing spinal pain. Great variation was found in the injection and treatment protocols used in these studies that preclude definite conclusions. Future research should focus on those solutions and protocols that are most commonly used in clinical practice and have been used in trials reporting effectiveness to help determine which patients, if any, are most likely to benefit from this treatment.