Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: Immediate Revascularization or Watchful Waiting?

Based on several randomized clinical trials, carotid revascularization has been shown to reduce future stroke risk among individuals with severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis. However, a well-recognized problem with such prophylactic intervention is the risk of periprocedural stroke, death, or myocardial infarction. If actual stroke risk with asymptomatic carotid stenosis can be reduced significantly by aggressive medical management, carotid revascularization may yield marginal benefit or even cause harm especially in those with limited life expectancy. Based on recent observational data, it is becoming apparent that the stroke risk in this population has been declining with better medical management alone. This has prompted a few to avoid carotid revascularization for asymptomatic carotid stenosis altogether. Others feel such conclusions cannot be made with observational data alone. In the midst of this controversy, it is important that clinicians perform carotid revascularization on a case by case basis while ensuring optimal medical management in all patients. An algorithmic approach to decision making based on available evidence will enable clinicians to personalize patient management with efficiency.     

The TNF-derived TIP peptide activates the epithelial sodium channel and ameliorates experimental nephrotoxic serum nephritis

1. Download : Download high-res image (407KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Incremental value of live/real time three‐dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in the assessment of ventricular septal rupture following acute myocardial infarction

Ventricular septal rupture is a serious complication following acute myocardial infarctions and is associated with a significant mortality rate. Classically, two‐dimensional transthoracic echocardiography has been used to diagnose this complication and visualize its location. Two‐dimensional transesophageal echocardiography has supplemented the transthoracic approach by providing more accurate assessment of the defect size and in guiding closure both percutaneously and intraoperatively. This modality, however, is limited to two‐dimensional views only, and a greater breadth of information is instead available through the use of three‐dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. We present a series of 11 patients in which live/real time three‐dimensional transesophageal echocardiography offered incremental benefits over two‐dimensional imaging alone.     

Pros and cons of perfusion balloons in failed angioplasty

Prolonged inflation with perfusion balloons is commonly used in failed angioplasty. The objective of this study was to determine the angiographic outcome of 59 consecutive patients treated with prolonged inflation with perfusion balloons as the primary treatment for failed angioplasty. Angiographic success (< 50% stenosis and normal flow) was achieved in 41%. Angiographic success was greater in the left anterior descending coronary artery (67% versus 33% for non-left anterior descending involvement, P = .044) and was less in complex dissections (25% versus 75% for no dissection or simple dissections, P = .025). Angiographic deterioration occurred in 37.5% of the successful group and 77% of the unsuccessful group (P = .002) and was more frequent in the right coronary artery (88% versus 50% for non-right coronary involvement, P = .007) and complex dissections (92% versus 38% for no dissection or simple dissections, P = .0001). Thus, in a group of patients with unsuccessful outcome following conventional balloon angioplasty, success with the perfusion balloon was modest. Furthermore, angiographic deterioration was frequently observed following unsuccessful prolonged inflation.     

We Built This House; It’s Time to Move in: Leveraging Existing DICOM Structure to More Completely Utilize Readily Available Detailed Contrast Administration Information

The Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) standard is the universal format for interoperability in medical imaging. In addition to imaging data, DICOM has evolved to support a wide range of imaging metadata including contrast administration data that is readily available from many modern contrast injectors. Contrast agent, route of administration, start and stop time, volume, flow rate, and duration can be recorded using DICOM attributes [1]. While this information is sparsely and inconsistently recorded in routine clinical practice, it could potentially be of significant diagnostic value. This work will describe parameters recorded by automatic contrast injectors, summarize the DICOM mechanisms available for tracking contrast injection data, and discuss the role of such data in clinical radiology.     

From the Cover: Bumblebees perceive the spatial layout of their environment in relation to their body size and form to minimize inflight collisions

Animals that move through complex habitats must frequently contend with obstacles in their path. Humans and other highly cognitive vertebrates avoid collisions by perceiving the relationship between the layout of their surroundings and the properties of their own body profile and action capacity. It is unknown whether insects, which have much smaller brains, possess such abilities. We used bumblebees, which vary widely in body size and regularly forage in dense vegetation, to investigate whether flying insects consider their own size when interacting with their surroundings. Bumblebees trained to fly in a tunnel were sporadically presented with an obstructing wall containing a gap that varied in width. Bees successfully flew through narrow gaps, even those that were much smaller than their wingspans, by first performing lateral scanning (side-to-side flights) to visually assess the aperture. Bees then reoriented their in-flight posture (i.e., yaw or heading angle) while passing through, minimizing their projected frontal width and mitigating collisions; in extreme cases, bees flew entirely sideways through the gap. Both the time that bees spent scanning during their approach and the extent to which they reoriented themselves to pass through the gap were determined not by the absolute size of the gap, but by the size of the gap relative to each bee’s own wingspan. Our findings suggest that, similar to humans and other vertebrates, flying bumblebees perceive the affordance of their surroundings relative their body size and form to navigate safely through complex environments.

Avoiding collisions with obstacles is a requirement for successful locomotion through most natural habitats, where the physical environment is often cluttered and complex. At the most elemental level, animals moving through their environments need to identify gaps between obstacles and assess their passability. In this context, whether a gap between obstacles “affords” passing is determined by the fit between the spatial layout of the environment and the properties of the organism’s form and action system, as described in classical theses on affordances (1–3). In humans and other highly cognitive vertebrates, the perception of affordances for performing visually guided actions such as grasping, passing through apertures, and climbing is actively shaped throughout ontogeny, as body size, configuration, and experience change (2, 4–7). However, the strategies used by animals with much smaller brains, such as insects, to contend with the challenges of navigating environmental clutter and spatial heterogeneity are unclear.We used bumblebees to investigate whether flying insects take into account their own size during interactions with their surroundings. Bumblebees and other volant insects that travel long distances (8) and frequently encounter regions of dense clutter can be expected to exhibit strategies to avoid collisions, because damage to sensitive structures such as the wings is irreparable and adversely impacts flight performance and lifespan (9, 10). For an animal attempting to navigate through tight spaces, perceiving the relationship between the layout of the environment and its own size can help inform the animal of its potential for collision-free passage. Bumblebee workers naturally display large variation in body size within a given colony (11, 12), and thus are particularly suitable models for testing the effects of insect body size on aerial navigation and for determining whether insects perceive the external environment in relation to their own spatial dimensions.To elicit repeatable flight behavior, we trained foraging bumblebees to fly within a 1.6 × 0.3 × 0.3 m (l × w × h) flight tunnel that separated the hive from a foraging arena (Materials and Methods, SI Appendix, Fig. S1, and Movie S1). After bees were habituated to the setup and began foraging normally, we placed an unexpected obstacle within the tunnel, consisting of a thin vertical wall (5-mm thickness) spanning the tunnel’s width and height. The obstructing wall contained a rectangular gap starting midway up and extending to the top of the wall (Materials and Methods, SI Appendix, Fig. S1, and Movie S1). The width of the gap was varied between 20 and 60 mm over different trials, with the presenting order of gap sizes chosen randomly. A high-speed camera placed above the tunnel was used to record bees’ instantaneous positions, heading/yaw orientations (Fig. 1A), and trajectories as they approached the obstructing wall and passed through the gap. To prevent bees from becoming familiar with the experimental paradigm, the obstructing wall was removed after each flight recording. In total, we recorded and analyzed over 400 flights of bees of varying body sizes flying through seven different gap sizes (SI Appendix, Table S1). For the population of bees recorded, wingspan was the longest dimension of the body and it varied linearly by a factor of 1.9 compared to their longitudinal body length while in flight (SI Appendix, Fig. S2A).Open in a separate windowFig. 1.Bumblebees can safely fly through gaps that are smaller than their wingspan. (A and B) Illustrations indicating the wingspan of bees (Ws), the size of the gap (Gs), and the positive and negative yaw (heading) angles for bees flying in the tunnel, respectively. (C) Schematic illustration of the flight of a bee flying through a gap that is much wider than its wingspan. (D) The instantaneous yaw angle of bee shown in C. (E) Schematic illustrationof the flightofabeeflying through a gap that is smaller than its wingspan. (F) The instantaneous yaw angle of bee shown in E. Flights, in both cases (C and E), consisted of approach, lateral peering, and—for the smaller gap size (E)—body reorientation (an increase in yaw angle) while passing through the gap. The differences in reorientation behavior can be noted at x = 0 (location of the gap), whereas in F the bee displays a large increase in yaw angle that reorients its body to pass through the small gap, and body reorientation in D is minimal. For the flight shown in C and D, Ws = 27.5 mm and Gs = 50 mm, while for the flight shown in E and F, Ws = 27 mm and Gs = 25 mm.