Efficacy and safety of topical application of human fibrinogen/thrombin-coated collagen patch (TachoComb) for treatment of air leakage after standard lobectomy.

OBJECTIVES: Persisting air leakage after pulmonary resection remains a significant problem. The aim of the study was to evaluate the incidence of air leakage after standard lobectomy and test the efficacy and safety of TachoComb (TC). METHODS: A total of 189 patients undergoing lobectomy were enrolled in a multi-centre, open, randomised, and prospective study to test the efficacy and safety of TachoComb (TC) for air leakage treatment. Air leakage was assessed by water submersion test, and scored as grades 0 if no, 1 if countable, 2 if a stream of and 3 if coalescent bubbles have been observed. Any sites with grade 3 air leakage received further stapling or limited suturing until grade 0, 1 or 2 was obtained. Treatment of air leakage was done with TC or suturing according to randomisation. Air leakage was assessed by further submersion tests. Postoperative air leakage was assessed using the Pleur-Evac system. RESULTS: Overall incidence of air leakage 48+/-6 h after surgery was 34% for TC and 37% for standard treatment (P=0.76). The reduction of intra-operative air leak intensity in the subgroup with grades 1-2 was significantly higher for the TC group (P=0.015). Postoperative air leakage intensity in the subgroup with air leakage grades 1-2 was lower for TC than standard treatment (P=0.047). The mean duration of postoperative air leakage in the subgroup with grades 1-2 was shorter for the TC group than for standard treatment, i.e. 1.9+/-1.4 vs. 2.7+/-2.2 days (P=0.015). CONCLUSIONS: TC could be proven as well-tolerated and safe. In the subgroup of patients with established air leakage, TC showed superior potential in reduction of intra-operative air leakage as well as in reduction of intensity and duration of postoperative air leakage.     

Prediction of necrosis after chemotherapy of advanced germ cell tumors: results of a prospective multicenter trial of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group

PURPOSE: We evaluated the prognostic parameters of necrotic residual tumors after chemotherapy of advanced germ cell tumors to improve on the current indications for surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1996 and January 2000, in 8 centers of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group, preoperative parameters were assessed to predict necrosis in the residual tumors of 261 patients with retroperitoneal residual tumor resection after first (92%) and second line (8%) chemotherapy. RESULTS: Of 232 evaluable patients 39 had pure seminoma and 5 had viable cancer (1 with seminoma) in the residual tumor. Of the remaining 193 patients with nonseminoma 35% had necrosis, 34% teratoma and 31% had viable carcinoma in the residual tumor. After multivariate analysis and exclusion of patients with seminoma, the 3 parameters independently predictive of necrosis were alpha-fetoprotein before chemotherapy less than 20 ng/ml, and tumor volume before and after chemotherapy. A mathematical model to predict necrosis yielded a test accuracy of 75%, a sensitivity to predict necrosis of 52% and a specificity of 87%. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with pure seminoma should not undergo residual tumor resection because 97% of patients who received adequate chemotherapy were found to have no residual seminoma. In cases of nonseminoma alpha-fetoprotein values before chemotherapy less than 20 ng/ml and a high percentage of shrinkage during chemotherapy reliably predicted only 19% of cases of necrosis. Therefore, this model is clinically irrelevant and patients with minimal residual disease should undergo surgery. New methods are necessary to improve the preoperative selection of patients after chemotherapy.     

Laser treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: basics and physical differences

Context

Laser treatment of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) has become more prevalent in recent years. Although multiple surgical approaches exist, there is confusion about laser-tissue interaction, especially in terms of physical aspects and with respect to the optimal treatment modality.

Objective

To compare available laser systems with respect to physical fundamentals and to discuss the similarities and differences among introduced laser devices.

Evidence acquisition

The paper is based on the second expert meeting on the laser treatment of BPO organised by the European Association of Urology Section of Uro-Technology. A systematic literature search was also carried out to cover the topic of laser treatment of BPO extensively.

Evidence synthesis

The principles of generation of laser radiation, laser fibre construction, the types of energy emission, and laser-tissue interaction are discussed in detail for the laser systems used in the treatment of BPO. The most relevant laser systems are compared and their physical properties discussed in depth.

Conclusions

Laser treatment of BPO is gaining widespread acceptance. Detailed knowledge of the physical principles allows the surgeon to discriminate between available laser systems and their possible pitfalls to guarantee high safety levels for the patient.     

Prediction of fracture risk in men: a cohort study

FRAX is a tool that identifies individuals with high fracture risk who will benefit from pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis. However, a majority of fractures among elderly occur in people without osteoporosis and most occur after a fall. Our aim was to accurately identify men with a high future risk of fracture, independent of cause. In the population‐based Uppsala Longitudinal Study of Adult Men (ULSAM) and using survival analysis we studied different models' prognostic values (R²) for any fracture and hip fracture within 10 years from age 50 (n = 2322), 60 (n = 1852), 71 (n = 1221), and 82 (n = 526) years. During the total follow‐up period from age 50 years, 897 fractures occurred in 585 individuals. Of these, 281 were hip fractures occurring in 189 individuals. The rates of any fracture were 5.7/1000 person‐years at risk from age 50 years and 25.9/1000 person‐years at risk from age 82 years. Corresponding hip fractures rates were 2.9 and 11.7/1000 person‐years at risk. The FRAX model included all variables in FRAX except bone mineral density. The full model combining FRAX variables, comorbidity, medications, and behavioral factors explained 25% to 45% of all fractures and 80% to 92% of hip fractures, depending on age. The corresponding prognostic values of the FRAX model were 7% to 17% for all fractures and 41% to 60% for hip fractures. Net reclassification improvement (NRI) comparing the full model with the FRAX model ranged between 40% and 53% for any fracture and between 40% and 87% for hip fracture. Within the highest quintile of predicted fracture risk with the full model, one‐third of the men will have a fracture within 10 years after age 71 years and two‐thirds after age 82 years. We conclude that the addition of comorbidity, medication, and behavioral factors to the clinical components of FRAX can substantially improve the ability to identify men at high risk of fracture, especially hip fracture. © 2012 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.     

Predicting discharge location of hip fracture patients; the new discharge of hip fracture patients score

Purpose

This paper reports on the development and validity of a new instrument, called the discharge of hip fracture patients score (DHP), that predicts at admission the discharge location in patients living in their own home prior to hip fracture surgery.

Methods

A total of 310 patients aged 50 years and above were included. Risk factors for discharge to an alternative location (DAL) were analysed with a multivariable regression analysis taking the admission variables into account with different weights based on the estimates. The score ranged from 0–100 points. The cut-off point for DAL was calculated using a ROC analysis. Reliability of the DHP was evaluated.

Results

Risk factors for DAL were higher age, female gender, dementia, absence of a partner and a limited level of mobility. The cut-off point was set at 30 points, with a sensitivity of 83.8%, a specificity of 64.7% and positive predictive value of 79.2%.

Conclusion

The DHP is a valid, simple and short instrument to be used at admission to predict discharge location of hip fracture patients.     

Contralateral hip fractures and other osteoporosis-related fractures in hip fracture patients: incidence and risk factors. An observational cohort study of 1,229 patients

Purpose

To report risk factors, 1-year and overall risk for a contralateral hip and other osteoporosis-related fractures in a hip fracture population.

Methods

An observational study on 1,229 consecutive patients of 50?years and older, who sustained a hip fracture between January 2005 and June 2009. Fractures were scored retrospectively for 2005–2008 and prospectively for 2008–2009. Rates of a contralateral hip and other osteoporosis-related fractures were compared between patients with and without a history of a fracture. Previous fractures, gender, age and ASA classification were analysed as possible risk factors.

Results

The absolute risk for a contralateral hip fracture was 13.8?%, for one or more osteoporosis-related fracture(s) 28.6?%. First-, second- and third-year risk for a second hip fracture was 2, 1 and 0?%. Median (IQR) interval between both hip fractures was 18.5 (26.6) months. One-year incidence of other fractures was 6?%. Only age was a risk factor for a contralateral hip fracture, hazard ratio (HR) 1.02 (1.006–1.042, p?=?0.008). Patients with a history of a fracture (33.1?%) did not have a higher incidence of fractures during follow-up (16.7?%) than patients without fractures in their history (14?%). HR for a contralateral hip fracture for the fracture versus the non-fracture group was 1.29 (0.75–2.23, p?=?0.360).

Conclusion

The absolute risk of a contralateral hip fracture after a hip fracture is 13.8?%, the 1-year risk was 2?%, with a short interval between the 2 hip fractures. Age was a risk factor for sustaining a contralateral hip fracture; a fracture in history was not.     

Cement leakage as a possible complication of balloon kyphoplasty—is there a difference between osteoporotic compression fractures (AO type A1) and incomplete burst fractures (AO type A3.1)?

Background  

Besides the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures of AO type A1, balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) is seen as a therapeutic option even in the treatment of incomplete osteoporotic burst fractures (AO type A3.1). However, due to involvement of the posterior vertebral body wall, the risk of cement leakages is considered to be higher. This study focuses on the frequency and pattern of cement leakages in AO type A3.1 fractures compared with osteoporotic compression fractures (AO type A1).