Ghrelin Does Not Predict Adaptive Hyperphagia in Patients With Short Bowel Syndrome

Background: Adaptive hyperphagia is associated with reduced dependence on parenteral nutrition in patients with short bowel syndrome, but mechanisms have not been described. Ghrelin (GHR) has orexigenic effects, whereas peptide YY (PYY) reduces intake. GHR also acts as a hormone to control body fat stores. The authors evaluated whether GHR or PYY was related to caloric intake or absorption in patients with short bowel syndrome and whether GHR was associated with body mass index. Methods: Patients were admitted twice for nutrient balance. Height and body weight were obtained using standardized protocols. Energy intake >40 kcal/kg/day was defined as adaptive hyperphagia. Fasting plasma PYY and GHR were assayed in duplicate with Linco enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay kits. Results: The median age of the 7 study participants was 62 (range, 45‐66) years, time with short bowel syndrome was 6.6 (range, 2‐29) years, and body mass index was 21.2 kg/m² (range, 19‐27.7). Five patients had adaptive hyperphagia. Neither GHR nor PYY was significantly related to energy intake or absorption (GHR: R = 0.22 and R = –0.233, PYY: R = 0.10 and R = –0.13). Body mass index trended toward an inverse association with GHR (GHR: R = –0.540, P = .211). Conclusion: The rigorous adaptive hyperphagia seen in these patients with short bowel syndrome was not related to fasting GHR or PYY, suggesting the need to explore other mechanisms.     

Effectiveness of a Lifestyle Intervention Program Among Persons at High Risk for Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes in a Rural Community

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of translating the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) lifestyle intervention into practice in a rural community. Methods: In 2008, the Montana Diabetes Control Program worked collaboratively with Holy Rosary Healthcare to implement an adapted group-based DPP lifestyle intervention. Adults at high risk for diabetes and cardiovascular disease were recruited and enrolled (N = 101). Participants set targets to reduce fat intake and increase physical activity (≥150 mins/week) in order to achieve a 7% weight loss goal. Findings: Eighty-three percent (n = 84) of participants completed the 16-session core program and 65 (64%) participated in 1 or more after-core sessions. Of those completing the core program, the mean participation was 14.4 ± 1.6 and 3.9 ± 1.6 sessions during the core and after core, respectively. Sixty-five percent of participants met the 150-min-per-week physical activity goal during the core program. Sixty-two percent achieved the 7% weight loss goal and 78% achieved at least a 5% weight loss during the core program. The average weight loss per participant was 7.5 kg (range, 0 to 19.7 kg), which was 7.5% of initial body weight. At the last recorded weight in the after core, 52% of participants had met the 7% weight loss goal and 66% had achieved at least a 5% weight loss. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that it is feasible to implement a group-based DPP in a rural community and achieve weight loss and physical goals that are comparable to those achieved in the DPP.