Comparison of renal function detriments after local tumor ablation or partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma

Purpose

Local tumor ablation (LTA) and partial nephrectomy (PN) represent treatment alternatives for patients diagnosed with small renal mass and both may result in renal function detriments. The aim of the study was to compare renal function detriments after LTA or PN.

Methods

A Surveillance epidemiology and End Results-Medicare-linked retrospective cohort of 2850 T1 kidney cancer patients who underwent LTA or PN was abstracted. Short-term outcomes consisted of 30-day acute kidney injury (AKI) and 30-day dialysis rates. Long-term outcomes consisted of episodes of AKI, mild and moderate–severe chronic kidney disease (CKD), end-stage renal disease, hemodialysis and anemia in CKD. Analyses consisted of propensity score matching, logistic and Cox regression.

Results

After propensity score matching, 1122 patients remained. The 30-day incidence of AKI was 4.6 % after LTA and 9.4 % after PN. In multivariable analyses (MVAs), LTA was associated with a lower AKI rate (OR 0.42; p = 0.001). The 30-day incidence of any dialysis was <2 % after either LTA or PN. In MVA, LTA was not associated with a lower rate of any dialysis (OR 0.43; p = 0.2). At long-term assessment, both the unadjusted and adjusted rates of all six examined end points were not different between LTA and PN (all p > 0.5).

Conclusions

LTA offers short-term protective effect from AKI. The short-term rates of any dialysis treatment are similar after either LTA or PN. At long-term assessment, LTA and PN renal function detriment rates are not different. Concern for long-term functional outcomes should not be a barrier for PN.

     

The novel nomogram of Gleason sum upgrade: Possible application for the eligible criteria of low dose rate brachytherapy

Objective: To examine the rate of Gleason sum upgrading (GSU) from a sum of 6 to a Gleason sum of ≥7 in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP), who fulfilled the recommendations for low dose rate brachytherapy (Gleason sum 6, prostate‐specific antigen ≤10 ng/mL, clinical stage ≤T2a and prostate volume ≤50 mL), and to test the performance of an existing nomogram for prediction of GSU in this specific cohort of patients. Methods: The analysis focused on 414 patients, who fulfilled the European Society for Therapeutic Radiation and Oncology and American Brachytherapy Society criteria for low dose rate brachytherapy (LD‐BT) and underwent a 10‐core prostate biopsy followed by RP. The rate of GSU was tabulated and the ability of available clinical and pathological parameters for predicting GSU was tested. Finally, the performance of an existing GSU nomogram was explored. Results: The overall rate of GSU was 35.5%. When applied to LD‐BT candidates, the existing nomogram was 65.8% accurate versus 70.8% for the new nomogram. In decision curve analysis tests, the new nomogram fared substantially better than the assumption that no patient is upgraded and better than the existing nomogram. Conclusions: GSU represents an important issue in LD‐BT candidates. The new nomogram might improve patient selection for LD‐BT and cancer control outcome by excluding patients with an elevated probability of GSU.     

Determination of polymorphonuclear neutrophil adhesion receptors. Effect of pre-analytic factors

Polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) adherence receptors expression varies with leukocyte activation state. Their quantification need accurate and inter-laboratories reproducible methods, without artefactual activation. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to study the influence of cell preparation on PMN adherence receptors expression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was proposed to quantify, using immunolabeling standard (QIFIKIT(R), Dako), surface expression of the main adherence receptors (L-selectin and B(2) integrins), from different preparations of PMN: total blood collected with EDTA, isolated PMN by density gradient Polymorphprep(TM) 1,113 (Nycomed Pharma) and formaldehyde fixed PMN. RESULTS: A decrease of all receptors was noted after isolation and fixation of PMN, in comparison with whole blood PMN analysis. These results differed from data previously reported since, in these studies, activated phenotypes (increased of B(2) integrins) were observed after isolation and fixation methods. CONCLUSION: The present study provides strong evidence that pre-analytical conditions are sources of biological variations and thus extreme care must be taken in the interpretation of results. It underlines the interest of consensual practices for these pre-analytic and analytic parameters in order to compare results in multicenter and longitudinal studies.     

Using a mobile health application to support self-management in COPD: a qualitative study

Background

Telehealth shows promise for supporting patients in managing their long-term health conditions, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, it is currently unclear how patients, and particularly older people, may benefit from these technological interventions.

Aim

To explore patients’ expectations and experiences of using a mobile telehealth-based (mHealth) application and to determine how such a system may impact on their perceived wellbeing and ability to manage their COPD.

Design and setting

Embedded qualitative study using interviews with patients with COPD from various community NHS services: respiratory community nursing service, general practice, and pulmonary rehabilitation.

Method

An embedded qualitative study was conducted to which patients were recruited using purposive sampling to achieve maximum variation. Interviews were carried out prior to receiving the mHealth system and again after a 6-month period. Data were analysed using a grounded theory approach.

Results

The sample comprised 19 patients (aged 50–85 years) with varied levels of computer skills. Patients identified no difficulties in using the mHealth application. The main themes encapsulating patients’ experience of using the mHealth application related to an increased awareness of the variability of their symptoms (onset of exacerbation and recovery time) and reassurance through monitoring (continuity of care).

Conclusion

Patients were able to use the mHealth application, interpret clinical data, and use these within their self-management approach regardless of previous knowledge. Telehealth interventions can complement current clinical care pathways to support self-management behaviour.