Treatment of premature ejaculation: New drugs and treatment strategies

This review discusses treatment options for men with premature ejaculation (PE), a common sexual dysfunction characterized by short ejaculatory latency, decreased sexual satisfaction, and distress. For a number of reasons, including embarrassment and the belief that PE is a normal part of aging, that it has no effective treatment, or that it will resolve itself, few men with PE seek treatment. Although several treatment options exist (eg, behavioral, cognitive, and sex therapy methods; desensitizing drugs; off-label use of antidepressants, phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, or à-blockers), the majority of men with PE are not satisfied with their results. New pharmacologic drugs develped specifically for the treatment of PE are undergoing evaluation in clinical trials. For example, recent clinical research studies have revealed on-demand administration of one such drug, dapoxetine, which achieved significant improvements in ejaculatory latency, control over ejaculation, and satisfaction with sexual intercourse. In addition, partners of men who received dapoxetine likewise reported improved satisfaction with sexual intercourse. Future studies may reveal that integration of pharmacologic drugs with psychologic and/or behavioral therapy techniques may be the optimal approach to the management of PE. PE is a treatable condition, and new drugs in development may provide benefits over those available.     

Characterization of the CXCR4 Signaling in Pancreatic Cancer Cells

CXCL12 and its receptor, CXCR4, are emerging as promising targets for modulating growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis in several human cancers. Indeed, blocking the receptor is sufficient to prevent metastasis and angiogenesis in experimental breast cancer xenografts. Recently, the biological effect of the CXCR4 in pancreatic cancer, one of the most deadly neoplastic diseases, has been reported. However, the molecular mechanism by which CXCR4 contributes to these properties is not completely understood. In this paper, we characterize the signaling pathways activated by CXCR4 in pancreatic cancer. We show that after CXCR4 activation, EGFR becomes tyrosine phosphorylated, and the kinase activity of this receptor, together with the activation of MMPs, Src, and PI3-Kinase, is required for CXCR4-mediated ERK activation. Analysis of this cascade in pancreatic cancer cells revealed that the ERK-mediated pathway regulates genes involved in angiogenesis, such as VEGF, CD44, HIF1α, and IL-8. Furthermore, ERK blockage inhibits the migration and tube formation of endothelial cells induced by CXCL12. Considering that inhibitors for several components of this pathway, including CXCR4 itself, are at different stages of clinical trials, this study provides theoretical justification for the clinical testing of these drugs in pancreatic cancer, thus extending the list of potential targets for treating this dismal disease.     

Prostatitis and male factor infertility: A review of the literature

Prostatitis and male infertility are frequent disorders, and the role of prostatitis in male infertility has been under discussion for more than 30 years. Many researchers have shown relevant links between the two. Although a causal relationship has not been definitely demonstrated, increasing evidence shows that chronic prostatitis has a relevant negative impact on male fertility potential, at least in certain subgroups. In the following review, we focus on the present state of knowledge on the role of chronic prostatitis as an etiologic factor in male infertility.     

The economics of medical therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Medical therapy is currently the most popular treatment choice for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Because medical therapy of BPH-related LUTS is considered a life-long strategy, short- and long-term cost considerations should play a major role in therapeutic decision-making. The effectiveness in terms of long and short amelioration of symptoms, flow rate, and quality of life are well documented for 5α-blockers and 5α-reductase inhibitors as well as for the gold standard treatment for BPH, transurethral resection of the prostate and minimally invasive therapies. Short-and long-term safety concerns also are well documented for these various treatment options. On the contrary, short- and long-term costs have been less well studied and comparisons depend on the model or analyses undertaken in the few studies available. However, the economic studies based on prospective clinical trial data that have become available throughout the past several decades allow us to rationalize our use of α-blockers, 5α -reductase inhibitors, and combination therapy, taking into consideration age, severity of symptoms, prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen, and the differential response of the various medications (and combination) in selected patients. Based on current studies, 5α -blockers generally provide cost-effective therapy for most patients, whereas 5α-reductase therapy and combination therapy provide cost-effective treatment for patients with larger prostate glands or higher baseline prostate-specific antigen levels.