Subjective cognitive complaints and amyloid burden in cognitively normal older individuals

Accumulating evidence suggests that subjective cognitive complaints (SCC) may indicate subtle cognitive decline characteristic of individuals with preclinical Alzheimer’s disease (AD). In this study, we sought to build upon previous studies by associating SCC and amyloid-β deposition using positron emission tomography with Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB-PET) in cognitively normal older individuals. One-hundred thirty one subjects (mean age 73.5±6) were administered three subjective cognitive questionnaires and a brief neuropsychological battery. A relationship between a subjective memory complaints composite score and cortical PiB binding was found to be significant, even after controlling for depressive symptoms. By contrast, there were no significant relationships between objective cognitive measures of memory and executive functions and cortical PiB binding. Our study suggests that SCC may be an early indicator of AD pathology detectable prior to significant objective impairment.     

Sphygmomanometry-Evoked Allodynia in Chronic Pain Patients With and Without Fibromyalgia

BACKGROUND:: Fibromyalgia is a chronic pain syndrome that affects about 2% of the U.S. general population, with greater prevalence among women (3.5%) than men (0.5%). Previous research results suggest that the experience of pain (allodynia) upon sphygmomanometry may indicate the presence of fibromyalgia. OBJECTIVE:: The aim of this study was to confirm these findings in patients with fibromyalgia and other chronic pain conditions and evaluate the use of sphygmomanometry as a potential screening tool for the identification of patients with fibromyalgia. METHODS:: A total of 150 people participated in this multicenter, cross-sectional observational study. The study included a physician-conducted evaluation to determine if the participant met the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1990 diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia. The presence of sphygmomanometry-evoked allodynia was assessed during a seated cuff pressure inflation that was repeated three times on each arm. Each site was provided a sphygmomanometer to ensure standardization, and the pressure of the cuff at the moment of pain initiation was recorded. If the patient did not indicate pain prior to 180 mmHg, then the inflation was stopped, a notation of no pain was made, and a cuff pressure of 180 mmHg was recorded. The mean of the six cuff pressure measurements was used for the analyses. Logistic regression was performed to analyze the relationship between sphygmomanometry-evoked allodynia and fibromyalgia. RESULTS:: The evaluable sample was 148 (one participant had too large an arm circumference for the sphygmomanometer and another did not receive the clinician evaluation of ACR-determined fibromyalgia diagnosis). Over half of the participants were determined to have an ACR diagnosis of fibromyalgia. Of these, 71 (91%) were women and had an average age of 54 years. Of the 70 participants with no fibromyalgia diagnosis, 42 (60%) were women and also had an average age of 54 years. Sixty-one (78%) of the fibromyalgia participants, compared with 25 (36%) of those with no fibromyalgia diagnosis, reported sphygmomanometry-evoked allodynia. The participants with fibromyalgia reported pain ata lower cuff pressure compared with those without fibromyalgia (132 mmHg vs. 166 mmHg, p < .01). The logistic regression showed that sphygmomanometry-evoked allodynia predicted an ACR-determined FM diagnosis (χ = 19.4, p < .01). DISCUSSION:: These findings support previous research suggesting that patients who report pain upon sphygmomanometry may warrant further evaluation for the presence of fibromyalgia.     

The Rewards and Challenges of Becoming a Clinical Instructor

Frontline nurses working in the clinical area are a vital component to nursing education. Taking on the role of adjunct clinical instructor can be a rewarding way to increase one's own knowledge while performing the important task of educating the next generation of nurses.     

Essentially Winnicott: Creating Psychic Health

The authors of this paper recognize the paradox of identifying with the body of work of D. W. Winnicott as it was essential to his view that each analyst has to become the analyst s/he is or can be. This is to avoid the dead hand of conformity and falsity. Nevertheless his work continues to inspire creative use with its concern with health and those conditions for its development. Both authors find themselves committed to history taking, to needing and taking time, to a willingness to wait before interpreting, to a recognition that the self derives originally from a bodily state of unintegration, that the body remains significant for the expression of self‐states, to an understanding of aggression as not primarily associated with destructiveness, to attending to the state of mind in the analyst that encourages the establishment and maintenance of the analytic setting. Clinically their intention is to maintain a continuity within which psychic change can be facilitated, through an attention to the ongoing exchanges between both parties of the analytic relation. Several clinical examples are given from different settings to illustrate the presence of these tenets in their work.     

Embracing complexity and uncertainty to create impact: exploring the processes and transformative potential of co-produced research through development of a social impact model

The potential use, influence and impact of health research is seldom fully realised. This stubborn problem has caused burgeoning global interest in research aiming to address the implementation ‘gap’ and factors inhibiting the uptake of scientific evidence. Scholars and practitioners have questioned the nature of evidence used and required for healthcare, highlighting the complex ways in which knowledge is formed, shared and modified in practice and policy. This has led to rapid expansion, expertise and innovation in the field of knowledge mobilisation and funding for experimentation into the effectiveness of different knowledge mobilisation models. One approach gaining prominence involves stakeholders (e.g. researchers, practitioners, service users, policy-makers, managers and carers) in the co-production, and application, of knowledge for practice, policy and research (frequently termed integrated knowledge translation in Canada). Its popularity stems largely from its potential to address dilemmas inherent in the implementation of knowledge generated using more reductionist methods. However, despite increasing recognition, demands for co-produced research to illustrate its worth are becoming pressing while the means to do so remain challenging. This is due not only to the diversity of approaches to co-production and their application, but also to the ways through which different stakeholders conceptualise, measure, reward and use research. While research co-production can lead to demonstrable benefits such as policy or practice change, it may also have more diffuse and subtle impact on relationships, knowledge sharing, and in engendering culture shifts and research capacity-building. These relatively intangible outcomes are harder to measure and require new emphases and tools. This opinion paper uses six Canadian and United Kingdom case studies to explore the principles and practice of co-production and illustrate how it can influence interactions between research, policy and practice, and benefit diverse stakeholders. In doing so, we identify a continuum of co-production processes. We propose and illustrate the use of a new ‘social model of impact’ and framework to capture multi-layered and potentially transformative impacts of co-produced research. We make recommendations for future directions in research co-production and impact measurement.