Arthroscopic chondrectomy as a treatment of cartilage lesions

Although favorable effects of débridement with chondrectomy and drilling or abrasion have been reported in treating of cartilage lesions in the knee joint; however, in most cases an additional intervention is generally performed during arthroscopy. We studied 53 consecutive patients with solitary chondral lesions in the weight-bearing part of the knee and treated 86 cartilage lesions by arthroscopic débridement, including a detailed removal of damaged or undermined cartilage. We evaluated the postoperative course by questionnaire (mean follow-up 6.5 years, response rate 83%). All patients reported a positive effect of chondrectomy: 69% considered the knee considerably better or cured and 77% regarded the effect as permanent. There was no complication of the arthroscopies performed, and no patient noted any deterioration in the condition. We therefore recommend routine chondrectomy of cartilage lesions when these are found during an arthroscopy.     

Evaluation of a new device for measuring oral mucosal surface friction

Abstract – For the objective measurement of oral mucosal dryness or moisture, a device registering oral mucosal surface slide friction has been developed. Two prototypes, Probe I and Probe II, have been tested. Probe I was constructed for initial testing of the method and was based on easily accessible electrical components. Probe I was computerized and developed for more accurate registration and also for easy handling. Reliability and validity tests were carried out on Probe I as well as on Probe II. In repeated in vitro measurements, the probes showed good reproducibility. Validity was assessed on healthy subjects injected with methylscopolamine nitrate submucosally in the labial sulcus. All subjects experienced a pronounced oral mucosal dryness within half an hour. Registration with the surface slide friction device showed maximum friction values 1-2 h after injection. These reliability and validity tests gave good results for both Probe I and Probe II, but Probe II had several practical advantages over Probe I. Both probes were considerably more sensitive to changes of the oral mucosal surface than the previously used simple friction test using the back of a mouth mirror.