Postprocedural Antiplatelet Treatment after Emergent Carotid Stenting in Tandem Lesions Stroke: Impact on Stent Patency beyond Day 1

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Postprocedural dual-antiplatelet therapy is frequently withheld after emergent carotid stent placement during stroke thrombectomy. We aimed to assess whether antiplatelet regimen variations increase the risk of stent thrombosis beyond postprocedural day 1.MATERIALS AND METHODS:Retrospective review was undertaken of all consecutive thrombectomies for acute stroke with tandem lesions in the anterior circulation performed in a single comprehensive stroke center between January 9, 2011 and March 30, 2020. Patients were included if carotid stent patency was confirmed at day 1 postprocedure. The group of patients with continuous dual-antiplatelet therapy from day 1 was compared with the group of patients with absent/discontinued dual-antiplatelet therapy.RESULTS:Of a total of 109 tandem lesion thrombectomies, 96 patients had patent carotid stents at the end of the procedure. The early postprocedural stent thrombosis rate during the first 24 hours was 14/96 (14.5%). Of 82 patients with patent stents at day 1, in 28 (34.1%), dual-antiplatelet therapy was either not initiated at day 1 or was discontinued thereafter. After exclusion of cases without further controls of stent patency, there was no significant difference in the rate of subacute/late stent thrombosis between the 2 groups: 1/50 (2%) in patients with continuous dual-antiplatelet therapy versus 0/22 (0%) in patients with absent/discontinued dual-antiplatelet therapy (P = 1.000). In total, we observed 88 patient days without any antiplatelet treatment and 471 patient days with single antiplatelet treatment.CONCLUSIONS:Discontinuation of dual-antiplatelet therapy was not associated with an increased risk of stent thrombosis beyond postprocedural day 1. Further studies are warranted to better assess the additional benefit and optimal duration of dual-antiplatelet therapy after tandem lesion stroke thrombectomy.

In around 15% of endovascular procedures for anterior circulation stroke,¹ there is a tight stenosis or occlusion of the cervical carotid artery in addition to the intracranial artery occlusion. The optimal endovascular management of tandem lesions has yet to be defined; however, there is mounting evidence^2,3 that emergent stent placement in the carotid artery associated with at least 1 antiplatelet agent could lead to better recanalization rates and improved clinical outcomes. A more definitive answer should be provided by the Thrombectomy In TANdem lesions (TITAN) randomized multicenter trial,⁴ designed to assess the safety and efficacy of emergent internal carotid artery stent placement in tandem lesion thrombectomy. This study recently enrolled the first patient in early 2020.In patients undergoing emergent carotid stent placement, there is no consensus regarding the optimal periprocedural antiplatelet therapy. Many groups^5,6 chose to avoid dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) during the first 24 hours in an attempt to reduce the risk of hemorrhagic transformation. Conversely, less aggressive antiplatelet regimens might increase the risk of carotid stent thrombosis.Stent thrombosis was recently identified as a predictor of unfavorable clinical outcome.^7,8 To date, available data regarding stent patency rates remain scarce. Most case series of endovascular management for tandem lesions^5,9-11 do not report postprocedural stent patency, while some publications^12-15 offer partial data for a subgroup of patients for whom carotid imaging controls were available. Reported rates of stent thrombosis ranged between 1.2% and 22.0%.^{6-8,12-14,16,17}To date, no study has attempted to differentiate between early (first 24 hours) and subacute/late postprocedural stent thrombosis. During the first 24 hours, protection against stent thrombosis is conferred by antiplatelet agents administered during the procedure (periprocedural antiplatelets). Beyond 24 hours, the recommended antiplatelet regimen is DAPT for 4–12 weeks,^9,17 but in reality, antiplatelets are often tailored in view of neurological and extra-neurological hemorrhagic events. It is currently unknown whether discontinuation of DAPT is associated with an increased risk of late stent thrombosis.Thus, we aimed to describe the variations in the postprocedural antiplatelet regimen in a large consecutive cohort of tandem lesion thrombectomies with emergent carotid artery stent placement and to assess whether discontinuation of DAPT was associated with an increased risk of carotid stent thrombosis.     

Anatomic Snuffbox (Distal Radial Artery) and Radial Artery Access for Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms with FDA-Approved Flow Diverters

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Transradial access for neurointerventional procedures has been proved a safer and more comfortable alternative to femoral artery access. We present our experience with transradial (distal radial/anatomic snuffbox and radial artery) access for treatment of intracranial aneurysms using all 3 FDA-approved flow diverters.MATERIALS AND METHODS:This was a high-volume, dual-center, retrospective analysis of each institution’s data base between June 2018 and June 2020 and a collection of all patients treated with flow diversion via transradial access. Patient demographic information and procedural and radiographic data were obtained.RESULTS:Seventy-four patients were identified (64 female patients) with a mean age of 57.5 years with a total of 86 aneurysms. Most aneurysms were located in the anterior circulation (93%) and within the intracranial ICA (67.4%). The mean aneurysm size was 5.5 mm. Flow diverters placed included the Pipeline Embolization Device (Flex) (PED, n = 65), the Surpass Streamline Flow Diverter (n = 8), and the Flow-Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED, n = 1). Transradial access was successful in all cases, but femoral crossover was required in 3 cases (4.1%) due to tortuous anatomy and inadequate support of the catheters in 2 cases and an inability to navigate to the target vessel in a patient with an aberrant right subclavian artery. All 71 other interventions were successfully performed via the transradial approach (95.9%). No access site complications were encountered. Asymptomatic radial artery occlusion was encountered in 1 case (3.7%).CONCLUSIONS:Flow diverters can be successfully placed via the transradial approach with high technical success, low access site complications, and a low femoral crossover rate.

The transradial access (TRA), including distal radial artery (dRA) access in the anatomic snuffbox and radial artery (RA) access at the palmar surface of the wrist, is being increasingly used as primary vascular access for neurointerventional procedures. In prior years, large randomized trials in the field of interventional cardiology and more recent articles in neurointerventional surgery have shown higher patient preference for the TRA, cost reduction, as well as lower morbidity and mortality compared with the traditional transfemoral access (TFA).^1-11 Reduction in access site complications has been a particular advantage of wrist over femoral access and is an important consideration for vascular access choice in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms using flow diversion. Patients undergoing flow diversion are required to take dual-antiplatelet agents and receive heparin during the procedure, all of which increase the risk of bleeding from the access site.¹² Also, flow diverters (FDs) may require large-bore catheter assemblies for delivery and deployment, which may increase the risk of radial artery occlusion, access site bleeding, or vascular injury.^13,14To date, only a limited number of case reports and case series have described the safety and feasibility of TRA for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms using flow diverters.^15-22Recently, a large, retrospective multicenter study reported the safety of TRA for flow diversion, showing a lower access site (P = .039) and overall complication rate (P = .035).¹² This study, however, did not cover catheter systems, patient functional outcome, and aneurysm occlusion. Here, we report our experience with TRA (dRA [anatomic snuffbox] and RA) for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms using all 3 FDA-approved flow diverters, including technical feasibility, procedural safety, patient outcome, and aneurysm occlusion on follow-up. Additionally, we reviewed the current literature on use of flow diverters via TRA.     

Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide Attenuates Brain Edema by Protecting Blood–Brain Barrier and Glymphatic System After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in Rats

Brain edema is a vital contributor to early brain injury after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), which is responsible for prolonged hospitalization and poor outcomes. Pharmacological therapeutic targets on edema formation have been the focus of research for decades. Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) has been shown to participate in neural development and brain injury. Here, we used PACAP knockout CRISPR to demonstrate that endogenous PACAP plays an endogenous neuroprotective role against brain edema formation after SAH in rats. The exogenous PACAP treatment provided both short- and long-term neurological benefits by preserving the function of the blood–brain barrier and glymphatic system after SAH. Pretreatment of inhibitors of PACAP receptors showed that the PACAP-involved anti-edema effect and neuroprotection after SAH was facilitated by the selective PACAP receptor (PAC1). Further administration of adenylyl cyclase (AC) inhibitor and sulfonylurea receptor 1 (SUR1) CRISPR activator suggested that the AC–cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)–protein kinase A (PKA) axis participated in PACAP signaling after SAH, which inhibited the expression of edema-related proteins, SUR1 and aquaporin-4 (AQP4), through SUR1 phosphorylation. Thus, PACAP may serve as a potential clinical treatment to alleviate brain edema in patients with SAH.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s13311-020-00925-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.Key Words: Subarachnoid hemorrhage, brain edema, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide, blood–brain barrier, glymphatic system     

Can MRI differentiate between atypical cartilaginous tumors and high-grade chondrosarcoma? A systematic review

Background and purpose — Adequate staging of chondroid tumors at diagnosis is important as it determines both treatment and outcome. This systematic review provides an overview of MRI criteria used to differentiate between atypical cartilaginous tumors (ACT) and high-grade chondrosarcoma (HGCS).Patients and methods — For this systematic review PubMed and Embase were searched, from inception of the databases to July 12, 2018. All original articles describing MRI characteristics of pathologically proven primary central chondrosarcoma and ACT were included. A quality appraisal of the included papers was performed. Data on MRI characteristics and histological grade were extracted by 2 reviewers. Meta-analysis was performed if possible. The study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42018067959.Results — Our search identified 2,132 unique records, of which 14 studies were included. 239 ACT and 140 HGCS were identified. The quality assessment showed great variability in consensus criteria used for both pathologic and radiologic diagnosis. Due to substantial heterogeneity we refrained from pooling the results in a meta-analysis and reported non-statistical syntheses. Loss of entrapped fatty marrow, cortical breakthrough, and extraosseous soft tissue expansion appeared to be present more often in HGCS compared with ACT.Interpretation — This systematic review provides an overview of MRI characteristics used to differentiate between ACT and HGCS. Future studies are needed to develop and assess more reliable imaging methods and/or features to differentiate ACT from HGCS.

The incidence of chondrosarcoma of bone appears to have been increasing during the last decade and is now reported to be the most common primary malignant bone tumor in several countries (Thorkildsen et al. 2018, van Praag et al. 2018). Conventional chondrosarcoma is the most common subtype of chondrosarcoma. Other subtypes of chondrosarcoma (e.g., juxtacortical, mesenchymal, or secondary chondrosarcoma) are rare and show different radiologic appearance and clinical behavior (Bindiganavile et al. 2015).Conventional chondrosarcoma is classified into the histological grades 1 (currently known as atypical cartilaginous tumor [ACT]), 2, and 3. The metastatic potential, and therefore the disease-specific survival, correlates with the histological grade (Fletcher et al. 2013, Laitinen et al. 2018, Thorkildsen et al. 2018). ACTs rarely metastasize and are therefore reclassified as an intermediate type of tumor, not a malignancy (Fletcher et al. 2013). Due to the increase in patients undergoing MRI examinations for joint-related complaints, the incidental detection of ACT has increased substantially (van Praag et al. 2018).With the increasing incidence of ACT, clear radiologic criteria to differentiate ACT from high-grade chondrosarcoma (i.e., grades 2 and 3) become more and more important. Adequate staging of chondroid tumors at diagnosis is important as it determines both treatment and prognosis. High-grade chondrosarcomas behave aggressively. Between 10% and 30% of grade 2 and about 70% of grade 3 chondrosarcomas metastasize (Evans et al. 1977). Hence, high-grade chondrosarcoma (HGCS) requires wide en bloc resection with free surgical margins. In contrast, ACTs are intermediate tumors and can be treated either with intralesional curettage and local adjuvant or nonoperatively with regular follow-up when located in the long bones (Deckers et al. 2016).Due to the heterogenous composition of chondroid tumors, diagnostic biopsy is unreliable in assessing the genuine histological grade and malignant potential of chondrosarcomas (Laitinen et al. 2018). Therefore, physicians need to rely on imaging and clinical findings (e.g., pain is more common in HGCS) to differentiate ACT from HGCS. Imaging evaluation of cartilaginous and other bone tumors is generally based on multimodal assessment including at least conventional radiography and MRI (Nascimento et al. 2014).During the most recent decades research has focused mainly on differentiating enchondroma from chondrosarcoma (Choi et al. 2013, Douis et al. 2014, Crim et al. 2015, Lisson et al. 2018). New insights have shown that both enchondroma and ACT located in the long bones can be observed without treatment (Deckers et al. 2016, Sampath Kumar et al. 2016, Chung et al. 2018). These insights make the differentiation between ACT and HGCS clinically relevant. Currently, literature on differentiating ACT from HGCS is sparse and clear radiologic criteria are lacking. Therefore, we performed a systematic review to provide an overview of MRI characteristics used to date to differentiate between ACT and HGCS.     

Mind the gap: Teachers’ conceptions of student-staff partnership and its potential to enhance educational quality

Abstract

Introduction: Student-staff partnerships as a concept to improve medical education have received a growing amount of attention. Such partnerships are collaborations in which students and teachers seek to improve education by each adding their unique contribution to decision-making and implementation processes. Although previous research has demonstrated that students are favourable to this concept, teachers remain hesitant. The present study investigated teachers’ conceptions of student-staff partnerships and of the prerequisites that are necessary to render such partnerships successful and enhance educational quality.

Method: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 14 course coordinators who lead course design teams and also teach in 4 bachelor health programmes, using Bovill and Bulley’s levels of student participation as sensitising concepts during data analysis.

Results: The results pointed to three different conceptions of student-staff partnerships existing among teachers: Teachers teach and students study; teachers teach and value students’ feedback; and teachers and students co-create. The prerequisites for effective co-creation teachers identified were: Teachers must be open to involve students and create dialogues; students must be motivated and have good communication skills; the organisation must be supportive; and teachers should have the final say.

Conclusion: We conclude that teachers’ conceptions are consistent with Bovill and Bulley’s levels of student participation. Under certain conditions, teachers are willing to co-create and reach the highest levels of student participation.     

Age-related differences in motives for contacting out-of-hours primary care: a cross-sectional questionnaire study in Denmark

Abstract

Objective

Demands for out-of-hours primary care (OOH-PC) services are increasing. Many citizens call because of non-urgent health problems. Nevertheless, the patients’ motives for requesting medical help outside office hours remains an understudied area. This study aimed to examine motives for calling OOH-PC services in various age groups.     

Instrument-based Tests for Measuring Anterior Chamber Cells in Uveitis: A Systematic Review

ABSTRACT

Purpose

New instrument-based techniques for anterior chamber (AC) cell counting can offer automation and objectivity above clinician assessment. This review aims to identify such instruments and its correlation with clinician estimates.     

Shared decision-making for the management of small renal masses: Development and acceptability testing of a novel patient decision aid

IntroductionShared decision-making incorporates patients’ values and preferences to achieve high-quality decisions. The objective of this study was to develop an acceptable patient decision aid to facilitate shared decision-making for the management of small renal masses (SRMs).MethodsThe International Patient Decision Aids Standards were used to guide an evidence-based development process. Management options included active surveillance, thermal ablation, partial nephrectomy, and radical nephrectomy. A literature review was performed to provide incidence rates for outcomes of each option. Once a prototype was complete, alpha-testing was performed using a 10-question survey to assess acceptability with patients, patient advocates, urologists, and methodological experts. The primary outcome was acceptability of the decision aid.ResultsA novel patient decision aid was created to facilitate shared decision-making for the management of SRMs. Acceptability testing was performed with 20 patients, 10 urologists, two patient advocates, and one methodological expert. Responders indicated the decision aid was appropriate in length (82%, 27/33), well-balanced (82%, 27/33), and had language that was easy to follow (94%, 31/33). All patient responders felt the decision aid would have been helpful during their consultation and would recommend the decision aid for future patients (100%, 20/20). Most urologists reported they intend to use the decision aid (90%, 9/10).ConclusionsA novel patient decision aid was created to facilitate shared decision-making for management of SRMs. This clinical tool was acceptable with patients, patient advocates, and urologists and is freely available at: https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/decaids.html.