Recommendations for Managing Endodontic Emergencies during Coronavirus Disease 2019 Outbreak

IntroductionThe management of endodontic emergencies has been particularly challenging during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak because of the possible generation of airborne particles and aerosols. The aim of this report was to contribute to the practice of endodontics by proposing a general protocol for the management of emergencies showing the rationale for remote diagnosis, clinical procedures, and the use of personal protective equipment and barriers at the dental office during the COVID-19 outbreak.MethodsA review of the literature was conducted up to May 2020 on relevant institutional sites, aiming to retrieve the best updated evidence. The reporting considered the Reporting Tool for Practice Guidelines in Health Care statement.ResultsRecommendations from Cochrane Oral Health, the American Dental Association, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were included along with the American Association of Endodontists resources and scientific articles that addressed the issue.ConclusionsThe proposed protocol could contribute to the management of endodontic emergencies at the dental office during the COVID-19 outbreak.     

Laser therapy for recurrent aphthous stomatitis: an overview

Clinical Oral Investigations - To evaluate therapeutic effects of laser therapy on patients with recurrent aphthous stomatitis assessing evidences from previously published systematic reviews. An...     

Relationship between foot posture measurements and force platform parameters during two balance tasks in older and younger subjects

[Purpose] The aim of this study was to compare age-related differences in balance and anthropometric posture measurements of the foot and to determine any relationship between them. [Subjects and Methods] Sixty-eight older and 42 younger adults participated in this study. Foot posture was tested for four domains: 1) hallux flexion and extension range of motion using a goniometer, 2) navicular height and 3) length of the foot using a pachymeter, and 4) footprint (width of forefoot, arch index and hallux valgus). Balance was tested under two conditions on a force platform: bipodal in 60-s trials and unipodal in 30-s trials. The sway area of the center of pressure and velocity in the anteroposterior and mediolateral directions were computed. [Results] Older individuals showed significantly poorer balance compared with younger adults under in the unipodal condition (center of pressure area 9.97 vs. 7.72 cm²). Older people presented a significantly lower hallux mobility and higher values for width of the forefoot and transverse arch index than younger adults. The correlations between all foot posture and center of pressure parameters varied across groups, from weak to moderate (r −0.01 to −0.46). Low hallux mobility was significantly related to higher center of pressure values in older people. [Conclusion] These results have clinical implications for balance and foot posture assessments.Key words: Posture, Aging, Foot     

Late assessment of quality of life in patients with rectal carcinoma: comparison between sphincter preservation and definitive colostomy

Purpose

Patients with cancer of the lower and middle rectum who are candidates for curative surgery often have negative opinions on definitive colostomy. The purpose of this study is to compare the quality of life (QoL) of patients who undergo standard treatment for rectal cancer with sphincter preservation or definitive colostomy.

Methods

A total of 125 patients with adenocarcinoma of the lower or middle rectum who underwent radical surgery with curative intent with a follow-up ≥?1 year were recruited: 83 patients (group 1) were subjected to low anterior resection and low colorectal or coloanal anastomosis—thus preserving their sphincter—and 42 (group 2) were treated with abdominoperineal resection, followed by terminal definitive colostomy. QoL was assessed with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 questionnaires.

Results

Health and global quality of life were similar between groups; however, patients who underwent definitive colostomy had higher scores on the emotional (p value?=?0.016) and cognitive function scales (p value?=?0.017). Patients with sphincter preservation presented with more symptoms that were related to stool frequency (p value <?0.001), intestinal constipation (p value?=?0.005), fecal incontinence (p value?=?0.001), buttock pain (p value?=?0.023), and nausea and vomiting (p value?=?0.036), whereas patients with permanent colostomy had higher scores for dysuria (p value?=?0.033).

Conclusion

Although global QoL scores did not differ between groups, patients who underwent definitive colostomy had significantly better functional and symptom scale scores, reflecting greater function with fewer symptoms.

     

Short- and long-term outcomes of critically ill patients with cancer and prolonged ICU length of stay

BACKGROUND: Data on patients with cancer who have a prolonged length of stay (LOS) in the ICU are scarce. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the characteristics and the outcomes of cancer patients with life-threatening complications with an ICU stay >/= 21 days. METHODS: A cohort study performed at a 10-bed oncology medical-surgical ICU from May 2000 to December 2005. Prolonged ICU LOS was defined as an ICU stay >/= 21 days. RESULTS: During the period, 1,090 patients were admitted to the ICU and 163 patients (15%) had a prolonged ICU LOS. These patients, however, accounted for 48% (5,828/12,224) of the total ICU bed-days. The hospital and 6-month mortality rates were 50% and 60%, respectively, and similar to patients with ICU LOS < 21 days (51% and 61%, respectively). ICU-acquired events and complications were common, and the most frequent were infections (90%), mechanical ventilation (99%), and need for vasopressors (88%). The number of organ failures, older age, and poor performance status were the main outcome predictors. The median long-term follow-up after hospital discharge was 537 days (range, 193 to 1,119 days), and 29 patients (18%) were alive. CONCLUSIONS: Fifteen percent of critically ill patients with cancer had a prolonged ICU LOS. Short- and long-term survival rates were reasonable, and the prognosis was better than expected a priori. In our opinion, the length of ICU admission per se should not be used in the clinical decisions regarding the continuation of treatment in these patients.