Long-Term Depression in Rat Cerebellum Requires both NO Synthase and NO-sensitive Guanylyl Cyclase

Long-term depression (LTD) of synaptic transmission between parallel fibres and Purkinje cells is a well-known example of synaptic plasticity taking place in the cerebellum. Nitric oxide (NO) has been implicated in synaptic plasticity in other brain areas, but its function in cerebellar LTD is controversial. Even when an involvement is suggested, the NO signal transduction pathway is unclear. One candidate is the cyclic GMP-synthesizing enzyme, soluble guanylyl cyclase, whose activity in the brain and elsewhere is powerfully stimulated by NO. By recording intracellularly from Purkinje cells in cerebellar slices, we demonstrate that blockade of NO synthase completely inhibits LTD induced by pairing parallel fibre stimulation with postsynaptic Ca²⁺ spike firing. LTD was also blocked by intracellular application of 1H-[1, 2, 4]oxadiazolo[4, 3-a]quinoxalin-1-one, a recently identified potent and selective inhibitor of soluble guanylyl cyclase. These findings indicate that soluble guanylyl cyclase is required for cerebellar LTD and suggest that this enzyme, located within Purkinje cells, transduces the NO signal in this form of synaptic plasticity.     

Epitope Context and Reshaping of Activated T Helper Cell Repertoire

In recent years, a growing interest in the study of peptide antigenicity in relation to the role of flanking sequences and protein topology in processing, presentation, and recognition has been observed. However, the information available on the antigenicity of recombinant fusion proteins and their effect on the selection of antigen receptor repertoires is limited. To analyze the role of molecular topology of T epitopes in a system relevant to human pathology, we have used the bacterially expressed Schistosoma japonicum glutathione S transferase (GST) to construct recombinant antigens containing HIV-1 derived T cell determinants, and human T cell clones specific for these determinants. We found that antigenicity of a given GST—peptide combination was not the same when T cells and antigen presenting cells from different individuals were tested. Our results show that differences in processing and presentation of chimeric proteins are not dictated by the use of diverse restriction elements. We also found that the context in which an antigenic peptide is delivered affects the recruited repertoire as defined according to T cell receptor Vβ usage and fine specificities of selected T cells.