Metastasis-associated protein S100A4 induces a network of inflammatory cytokines that activate stromal cells to acquire pro-tumorigenic properties

Tumor cells have the ability to exploit stromal cells to facilitate metastasis. By using malignant melanoma as a model, we show that the stroma adjacent to metastatic lesions is enriched in the known metastasis-promoting protein S100A4. S100A4 stimulates cancer cells to secrete paracrine factors, such as inflammatory cytokines IL8, CCL2 and SAA, which activate stromal cells (endothelial cells and monocytes) so that they acquire tumor-supportive properties. Our data establishes S100A4 as an inducer of a cytokine network enabling tumor cells to engage angiogenic and inflammatory stromal cells, which might contribute to pro-metastatic activity of S100A4.     

Reduced quality of life in living kidney donors: association with fatigue, societal participation and pre-donation variables

Health related quality of life (HRQoL) of living kidney donors on average is good, but some donors experience a low HRQoL after donation. This study assessed the prevalence of reduced HRQoL and explored associations with pre‐ and post‐donation variables. 316 donors (response rate 74%) who donated a kidney between 1997 and 2009 filled in a questionnaire. HRQoL was measured using the Short‐Form 36; fatigue using the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory; societal participation using the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation‐Participation. Donors on average had better HRQoL than the general population. However, 12% had a reduced physical (PCS) and 18% a reduced mental (MCS) HRQoL. Donors with reduced HRQoL reported greater fatigue (P < 0.01), lower societal participation (P < 0.01) and showed a trend towards statistical significance in experiencing more donor–recipient relationship changes (P = 0.07). Prior to donation, donors with reduced PCS had a higher BMI (P < 0.05) and more often smoked (P < 0.05). Donors with reduced MCS had higher expectations (P < 0.05). Reduced HRQoL is associated with higher BMI, smoking and higher expectations prior to donation. These results may be used to develop a screening instrument to select donors at high risk for reduced HRQoL.     

Activity restrictions after gynecologic surgery: is there evidence?

Many surgeons recommend rest and restricting activities to their patients after surgery. The aim of this review is to summarize the literature regarding types of activities gynecologic surgeons restrict and intra-abdominal pressure during specific activities and to provide an overview of negative effects of sedentary behavior (rest). We searched PubMed and Scopus for years 1970 until present and excluded studies that described recovery of activities of daily living after surgery as well as those that assessed intra-abdominal pressure for other reasons such as abdominal compartment syndrome and hypertension. For our review of intra-abdominal pressure, we excluded studies that did not include a generally healthy population, or did not report maximal intra-abdominal pressures. We identified no randomized trial or prospective cohort study that studied the association between postoperative activity and surgical success after pelvic floor repair. The ranges of intra-abdominal pressures during specific activities are large and such pressures during activities commonly restricted and not restricted after surgery overlap considerably. There is little concordance in mean peak intra-abdominal pressures across studies. Intra-abdominal pressure depends on many factors, but not least the manner in which it is measured and reported. Given trends towards shorter hospital stays and off work intervals, which both predispose women to higher levels of physical activity, we urge research efforts towards understanding the role of physical activity on recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence after surgery.     

FCGR3A V(176) polymorphism for systemic lupus erythematosus susceptibility in Mexican population

The objective of this study is to establish whether there is an association between the presence of FCGR3A V(176) polymorphism with SLE or its manifestations. We included 94 patients according to the 1982 ACR criteria as well as 98 controls matched by age and gender. The 11 ACR diagnostic criteria were analyzed on the clinical files. The polymorphism FCGR3A V(176) was determined by direct sequencing. There was not an association between the polymorphism FCGR3A V(176) with SLE or its main manifestations. The allelic frequency for F(176) was: 0.80 and 0.72 in cases and controls, respectively (P?=?0.09, IC95%: 0.42?C1.07); and the genotypic frequency in the group of cases was: 0.65 for homozygotes F(176)/F(176), 0.30 for heterozygotes and 0.05 for the homozygotes V(176)/V(176), while for the control group it was 0.53, 0.39 and 0.08, respectively. The polymorphism FCGR3A V(176) is not associated with SLE or any of its manifestations in patients with SLE from the West of Mexico.     

Evaluation of alternative statistical models for crossover studies to demonstrate caffeine adjuvancy in the treatment of tension headache

This paper discusses alternative statistical models for the analysis of six crossover studies to determine whether better relief of tension headache occurs from treatment with an analgesic plus caffeine (C) than with the analgesic alone (A) or with placebo (P). Each patient in these crossover studies randomly received a pair of distinct medications in such a way as to treat the first two of four headaches with the initial medication in the pair and to treat the third and fourth headaches with the last medication in the pair. In order to have greater power for the C versus A comparison, three times as many patients were randomly assigned to the A:C and C:A sequence groups as to the A:P, C:P, P:A, and P:C sequence groups.

An issue of statistical interest for these crossover studies is the extent to which the possibility of unequal carryover effects of the three medications influences the roles of alternative models for data analysis and the interpretation of results. When carryover effects for all three medications are equal, univariate analysis of variance for the difference scores between the average response for the first two headaches and the average response for the third and fourth headaches for each patient provides nearly the same power for pairwise treatment comparisons as more comprehensive multivariate methods for all four headaches. However, for comparisons concerning carryover effects and for treatment comparisons with adjustment for carryover effects, multivariate methods encompassing all four headaches jointly can provide greater power than univariate analysis for difference scores, particularly when there is low intraclass correlation for responses within the same patient. Another noteworthy role for multivariate methods in situations with potentially unequal carryover effects is their capacity to clarify whether multiple types of carryover effects occur across the second, third, and fourth headaches in the respective sequence groups.

Multivariate models with alternative specifications of carryover effects are fit to the data from the six crossover studies to compare C, A, and P by weighted least squares. The role of potential variation among centers is addressed in these analyses by the use of stratified proportional means over centers, means of center means, and means ignoring centers. The primary focus of attention in the respective analyses is the evaluation of treatment comparisons with and without adjustment for potential differences among carryover effects of the treatments. Comparisons among carryover effects are assessed as well, but they mainly serve a background purpose since the principal issue is the extent to which findings for treatment comparisons are similar across alternative ways of accounting for potential carryover effects.

For all models, the average predicted response across all headaches treated with C was significantly better than that for A or P. For models that adjusted treatment effects for carryover effects in a statistically efficient way, the adjusted direct treatment effect of C was significantly better than that of A or P. Thus, the superiority of C over A found robust support from models both with and without adjustment for potential differences among carryover effects of the treatments.     

Use of the burn intervention score to calculate the charges of the care of burns

Background

To our knowledge this is the first published estimate of the charges of the care of burns in Sweden. The Linköping Burn Interventional Score has been used to calculate the charges for each burned patient since 1993. The treatment of burns is versatile, and depends on the depth and extension of the burn. This requires a flexible system to detect the actual differences in the care provided. We aimed to describe the model of burn care that we used to calculate the charges incurred during the acute phase until discharge, so it could be reproduced and applied in other burn centres, which would facilitate a future objective comparison of the expenses in burn care.