术后疼痛大鼠切口组织Toll样受体4及其下游细胞因子表达的变化

目的 探讨术后疼痛大鼠切口组织Toll样受体4(TLR4)及其下游细胞因子IL-1β、IL-6和TNF-αmRNA表达的变化. 方法 健康成年雄性SD大鼠74只,体重200～250 g,建立大鼠术后疼痛模型.于术前1d、术后0.5,1,2,6,12h及1,2,3,5,7d测定术侧与非术侧机械缩足反射阈值(PMWT);于术前1d、术后2,8h、1,2,3,5,7d采用荧光定量PCR法检测皮肤切口组织TLR4、IL-1β、IL-6和TNF-α mRNA的表达. 结果 与术前比较,大鼠术侧术后0.5 h～5 dPMWT降低,术后2h术侧切口组织TLR4mRNA表达下调,之后逐渐升高,IL-1β、IL-6和TNF-αmRNA于术后2,8h、1,2,3,5d表达上调(P＜0.05),非术侧PMWT差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);术侧PMWT术后6h最低,之后逐渐升高,术侧切口组织TLR4mRNA术后2d表达水平最高,IL-1β、IL-6和TNF-α mRNA分别于术后2h、1d、3d表达水平最高(P＜0.05).TLR4、IL-1β、IL-6和TNF-αmRNA表达水平与术侧PMWT呈负相关(r=-0.501,-0.743,-0.893,-0.657,P＜0.05),IL-1β、IL-6和TNF-αmRNA与TLR4 mRNA表达水平呈正相关(r =0.764,0.283,0.667,P＜0.05). 结论 术后疼痛大鼠切口组织TLR4及其下游炎性因子IL-1β、IL-6、TNF-α mRNA表达上调,该变化可能参与了术后疼痛的产生和维持.     

Accuracy of Diffusion Tensor Imaging for Diagnosing Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy in Patients Showing Spinal Cord Compression

ObjectiveTo assess the performance of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) for the diagnosis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) in patients with deformed spinal cord but otherwise unremarkable conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings.ResultsThe MD, LD, and RD cut-off values were 1.079 × 10^-3, 1.719 × 10^-3, and 0.749 × 10^-3 mm²/sec, respectively, and that of FA was 0.475. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were: 100 (4/4), 44.8 (13/29), 20 (4/20), and 100 (13/13) for MD; 100 (4/4), 27.6 (8/29), 16 (4/25), and 100 (8/8) for FA; 100 (4/4), 58.6 (17/29), 25 (4/16), and 100 (17/17) for MD∩FA; 100 (4/4), 68.9 (20/29), 30.8 (4/13), and 100 (20/20) for LD∩FA; and 75 (3/4), 68.9 (20/29), 25 (3/12), and 95.2 (20/21) for RD∩FA in percentage value. Diagnostic performance comparisons revealed significant differences only in specificity between FA and MD∩FA (p = 0.003), FA and LD∩FA (p < 0.001), FA and RD∩FA (p < 0.001), MD and LD∩FA (p = 0.024) and MD and RD∩FA (p = 0.024).ConclusionFractional anisotropy combined with MD, RD, or LD is expected to be more useful than FA and MD for diagnosing CSM in patients who show deformed spinal cords without signal changes on MRI.     

T2-Weighted Liver MRI Using the MultiVane Technique at 3T: Comparison with Conventional T2-Weighted MRI

Objective

To assess the value of applying MultiVane to liver T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) compared with conventional T2WIs with emphasis on detection of focal liver lesions.

Materials and Methods

Seventy-eight patients (43 men and 35 women) with 86 hepatic lesions and 20 pancreatico-biliary diseases underwent MRI including T2WIs acquired using breath-hold (BH), respiratory-triggered (RT), and MultiVane technique at 3T. Two reviewers evaluated each T2WI with respect to artefacts, organ sharpness, and conspicuity of intrahepatic vessels, hilar duct, and main lesion using five-point scales, and made pairwise comparisons between T2WI sequences for these categories. Diagnostic accuracy (Az) and sensitivity for hepatic lesion detection were evaluated using alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Results

MultiVane T2WI was significantly better than BH-T2WI or RT-T2WI for organ sharpness and conspicuity of intrahepatic vessels and main lesion in both separate reviews and pairwise comparisons (p < 0.001). With regard to motion artefacts, MultiVane T2WI or BH-T2WI was better than RT-T2WI (p < 0.001). Conspicuity of hilar duct was better with BH-T2WI than with MultiVane T2WI (p = 0.030) or RT-T2WI (p < 0.001). For detection of 86 hepatic lesions, sensitivity (mean, 97.7%) of MultiVane T2WI was significantly higher than that of BH-T2WI (mean, 89.5%) (p = 0.008) or RT-T2WI (mean, 84.9%) (p = 0.001).

Conclusion

Applying the MultiVane technique to T2WI of the liver is a promising approach to improving image quality that results in increased detection of focal liver lesions compared with conventional T2WI.     

Subtraction MR Venography Acquired from Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography: Comparison with Phase-Contrast MR Venography and Single-Phase Contrast-Enhanced MR Venography

ObjectiveTo evaluate the image characteristics of subtraction magnetic resonance venography (SMRV) from time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography (TRMRA) compared with phase-contrast MR venography (PCMRV) and single-phase contrast-enhanced MR venography (CEMRV).ResultsSingle-phase contrast-enhanced MR venography showed better image quality (median score 4 in both reviewers) than did the other two MRVs (p < 0.001), whereas SMRV (median score 3 in both reviewers) and PCMRV (median score 3 in both reviewers) had similar image quality (p ≥ 0.951). SMRV (median score 0 in both reviewers) suppressed arterial signal better than did the other MRVs (median score 1 in CEMRV, median score 2 in PCMRV, both reviewers) (p < 0.001). The dural sinus score of SMRV (median and interquartile range [IQR] 48, 43-50 for reviewer 1, 47, 43-49 for reviewer 2) was significantly higher than for PCMRV (median and IQR 31, 25-34 for reviewer 1, 30, 23-32 for reviewer 2) (p < 0.01) and did not differ from that of CEMRV (median and IQR 50, 47-52 for reviewer 1, 49, 45-51 for reviewer 2) (p = 0.146 in reviewer 1 and 0.123 in reviewer 2). The SNR and CNR of SMRV (median and IQR 104.5, 83.1-121.2 and 104.1, 74.9-120.5, respectively) were between those of CEMRV (median and IQR 150.3, 111-182.6 and 148.4, 108-178.2) and PCMRV (median and IQR 59.4, 49.2-74.9 and 53.6, 43.8-69.2).ConclusionSubtraction magnetic resonance venography is a promising MRV method, with acceptable image quality and good arterial suppression.