Two distinct two-step ranks of progesterone stimulation after three different levels of oestrogen priming. Effect on induction of luteinizing hormone surges in young and climacteric women

Age and menopausal status were evaluated as potential modulators of the progesterone action in the initiation of the mid-cycle luteinizing hormone (LH) surge in women. Three distinct levels of oestradiol priming were used, in combination with two different two-step ranks of progesterone stimulation (10/25 mg and 25/50 mg i.m. injections of progesterone in oil, over 2 consecutive days) in two groups of women, ten premenopausals, aged between 18 and 25 years, and 14 postmenopausals, aged between 48 and 57 years. The low, moderate and high levels of oestradiol priming were defined in the premenopausal group by days 5 and 9 of the cycle, and 0.4 mg transdermal oestradiol applied in the early follicular phase respectively. The corresponding situation in the postmenopausal women was defined by the absence of treatment, 0.1 mg transdermal oestradiol, and 0.4 mg transdermal oestradiol respectively. The oestradiol patches were maintained for 5 days, and the first progesterone dose administered on day 3 of treatment. Unambiguous LH surges, detected in serum and urine, were restricted to the protocols using 0.4 mg oestradiol in both groups, with an onset soon after progesterone administration. The surge was higher in the postmenopausal group in serum and urine. The percentage LH increase above baseline, however, was higher in the premenopausal women. The dose of progesterone did not result in any changes in pituitary LH release. Therefore, the oestradiol threshold for the progesterone stimulatory effect on LH release was similar in both groups. The postmenopausal women did not yield defective LH surges when adequately primed with oestradiol and progesterone.      

Age-related differences in distractibility and response to methylphenidate in monkeys

Increased susceptibility to distraction is a symptom of normal aging and several clinical syndromes, including Alzheimer's disease and attention deficit disorders. In the present study, aged and young adult macaques were well-trained to perform an automated delayed matching-to- sample (DMTS) task which assesses both attention and short-term memory. On 19% of all trials, a task-relevant distracting stimulus was presented during either the initial 1 or 3 s of delay intervals (early onset) or the final 1 or 3 s of delay intervals (late onset). In aged monkeys, both early and late onset distractors lasting 1 or 3 s impaired delayed recall on trials with the shortest delay intervals, but did not affect accuracy on trials with long delay intervals. In contrast, young adult monkeys were impaired only by the presence of an early onset distractor lasting 3 s. Impairment was selective for only those trials with the shortest delay intervals. Late onset distractors were relatively ineffective in producing distractibility in young adult animals. Methylphenidate (MPH; 0.005-1.0 mg/kg) failed to reduce distractibility in aged monkeys, producing locomotor abnormalities and hypophagia at doses ranging from 0.25 to 1.0 mg/kg. In young adult monkeys, however, distractibility was significantly attenuated by administration of the 0.125 mg/kg dose. Habituation to the distracting stimulus (under saline conditions) was assessed throughout the study and was not evident at any time point of testing. These data indicate that attention and recall after brief delays are impaired following exposure to a task-relevant distracting stimulus in both aged and young adult monkeys, but that aged monkeys are more susceptible to distraction and do not receive significant benefit from MPH administration.