The role of cutaneous lymphoscintigraphy in determining regional lymph node drainage of truncal melanomas.

In the absence of clinically positive regional nodes, any value of prophylactic dissection in malignant melanomas depends on accurate preoperative determination of the pathway of lymphatic drainage. We report on the use of noninvasive radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy in the determination of regional patterns of lymph node drainage in patients with melanomas. Ten patients were studied; treatment was altered by test results in 2. Eleven node groups were excised in 7 patients. There have been no metastatic melanomas found in any nodal basins not detected by lymphoscintigraphy 23 to 42 months after operation.     

Erythropoietin levels in amniotic fluid and extraembryonic coelomic fluid in the first trimester of pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to measure erythropoietin levels in amniotic fluid and extraembryonic coelomic fluid from 7-12 weeks' gestation. SUBJECTS: Twenty healthy women with ultrasonographically normal first trimester pregnancies prior to surgical termination. METHODS: Paired samples of amniotic fluid and extraembryonic coelomic fluid were collected by transvaginal ultrasound guided needling. Erythropoietin was measured in both pregnancy fluids using a radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: There was a highly significant difference between erythropoietin levels in extraembryonic coelomic fluid (median level 15.45 mU/ml; range 6.8-32.1 mU/ml) and those in amniotic fluid (median 5.0 mU/ml; range < 5.0-5.8 mU/ml) (P < 0.0001; Mann-Whitney U-test). The levels of erythropoietin in maternal serum (median 15.4 mU/ml; range 5.6-29.4 mU/ml) were similar to those in the extra-embryonic coelom (P = 0.81; Mann-Whitney U-test). No relation was demonstrated between erythropoietin levels in amniotic fluid or coelomic fluid and stage of gestation. CONCLUSION: High levels of erythropoietin in coelomic fluid suggests that the hormone is involved in the process of human extraembryonic erythropoiesis. The exact regulatory role remains unknown.     

Non-obstructive colonic dilatation in the trauma patient: an analysis of six patients.

Non-obstructive colonic dilatation was diagnosed in six of 13,641 patients admitted to a Level I trauma centre over a 70-month period (incidence, less than 0.05 per cent). Four were older than 60 years, and five required long-term support on a ventilator. Successful treatment depends on expeditious decompression of the dilated colon. Fibreoptic colonoscopy is the recommended method.     

Discovery of potent and selective inhibitors of procollagen C-proteinase for the treatment of fibrotic disorders

Introduction   Fibrosis is a component of many tissue pathologies leading to loss of normal tissue function, primarily due to excessive collagen deposition. Collagen is deposited following cleavage of the C- and N- terminal peptides from the pro-collagen molecule. The cleavage of the globular C-peptide by PCP reduces solubility of the fibrillar collagen molecule, resulting in deposition of insoluble collagen. Increased insoluble collagen deposition is a feature of all organ fibroses, with inhibition of this process, a key potential anti-fibrotic mechanism. The aim of this work was to discover potent and selective PCP inhibitors as experimental, topically applied, anti-fibrotic drugs for clinical evaluation.
Materials and methods   PCP was cloned from human osteosarcoma cells and enzymatic activity demonstrated using a PCP-specific peptide cleavage assay. Activities were confirmed by measuring cleavage of [³H]C-peptide from type-I pro-collagen. A cell-based fibroplasias model was employed to demonstrate compound efficacy using collagen deposition, liberated C-peptide and histological endpoints. The activities of PCP inhibitors in fibroblast and epithelial in vitro cell proliferation and migration assays, and selectivity vs. a panel of MMPs were also determined.
Discussion   In summary, we have identified and characterized potent and selective inhibitors of PCP for progression to clinical studies for investigation as a treatment paradigm for fibrotic disease.  

  Results     

96.

DXA-Generated Z-Scores and T-Scores May Differ Substantially and Significantly in Young Adults     

John J. Carey  Miriam F. Delaney  Thomas E. Love  Bradford J. Richmond  Barbara A. Cromer  Paul D. Miller  Martha Manilla-McIntosh  Steven A. Lewis  Charles L. Thomas  Angelo A. Licata 《Journal of clinical densitometry》2007,10(4):11-358

Central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard for non-invasive measurement of bone mineral density (BMD). Using this value and subject demographics, DXA software calculates T-scores and Z-scores. Professional society guidelines for the management of osteoporosis are based on T-scores and Z-scores, rather than on the actual BMD value. Although one expects T-scores and Z-scores to be very similar in young men and women for any given BMD measurement, little literature exists on this issue. Our clinical experience shows that some younger adult individuals (premenopausal women and men younger than 50 yr) have larger than expected difference between their DXA T-score and Z-score. This cross-sectional study evaluates the extent of this discordance between Z-scores and T-scores in a sample of 4275 men and women aged 20–49 yr. All subjects were scanned by central DXA using equipment manufactured by GE Lunar, GE, Madison, WI, or Hologic, Inc., Bedford, MA. Significant differences between Z-scores and T-scores were seen within individuals at the lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck, and trochanter (p value < 0.001) for both DXA systems. Although these differences were less than half a standard deviation (SD) in most instances, the magnitude of difference was substantial at times, being 1 or more SD in up to 11% of cases (range: −1.95 to +1.54 SD). The smallest differences were seen at the total hip and the largest differences were seen at the femoral neck for both technologies. This is in part because there is no single standard Z-score definition, resulting in different methods of calculation across, and even within, DXA manufacturers. Standardization of Z-score definition and method of calculation is indicated. DXA Z-scores should be interpreted with caution in men and women aged 20–50 yr.     

97.

RUSSELL TRACTION IN THE TREATMENT OF FRACTURES OF THE FEMUR: OBSERVATIONS ON ONE HUNDRED FIFTY-SIX CASES     

Lewis KM 《Annals of surgery》1941,113(2):226-244

     

98.

NPY's mixed messages          下载免费PDF全文

Heather L. Van Epps 《The Journal of experimental medicine》2005,202(11):1456

     

99.

An alternative approach to measuring treatment persistence with antipsychotic agents among patients with schizophrenia in the Veterans Health Administration          下载免费PDF全文

Xinhua S Ren  Shirley Qian    Lewis E Kazis 《Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment》2007,3(2):277-284

     

100.

Effect of the transpalatal arch during extraction treatment     

Heather L. Zablocki  James A. McNamara Jr  Lorenzo Franchi  Tiziano Baccetti 《American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics》2008,133(6):852-860

     

[首页] « 上一页 [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] 10 [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] 下一页 » 末  页»

DXA-Generated Z-Scores and T-Scores May Differ Substantially and Significantly in Young Adults

Central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard for non-invasive measurement of bone mineral density (BMD). Using this value and subject demographics, DXA software calculates T-scores and Z-scores. Professional society guidelines for the management of osteoporosis are based on T-scores and Z-scores, rather than on the actual BMD value. Although one expects T-scores and Z-scores to be very similar in young men and women for any given BMD measurement, little literature exists on this issue. Our clinical experience shows that some younger adult individuals (premenopausal women and men younger than 50 yr) have larger than expected difference between their DXA T-score and Z-score. This cross-sectional study evaluates the extent of this discordance between Z-scores and T-scores in a sample of 4275 men and women aged 20–49 yr. All subjects were scanned by central DXA using equipment manufactured by GE Lunar, GE, Madison, WI, or Hologic, Inc., Bedford, MA. Significant differences between Z-scores and T-scores were seen within individuals at the lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck, and trochanter (p value < 0.001) for both DXA systems. Although these differences were less than half a standard deviation (SD) in most instances, the magnitude of difference was substantial at times, being 1 or more SD in up to 11% of cases (range: −1.95 to +1.54 SD). The smallest differences were seen at the total hip and the largest differences were seen at the femoral neck for both technologies. This is in part because there is no single standard Z-score definition, resulting in different methods of calculation across, and even within, DXA manufacturers. Standardization of Z-score definition and method of calculation is indicated. DXA Z-scores should be interpreted with caution in men and women aged 20–50 yr.