How do normal subjects learn a simple adaptative task: How and why do paranoid schizophrenic patients fail?

Summary The authors studied the behavior of normal subjects and paranoid schizophrenic patients in a simple problem-solving situation. The schizophrenics were divided into two sample groups, one of individuals under treatment and the other of individuals not under treatment.The learning process involved in this problem-solving situation is very similar to an instrumental conditioning, and can be understood by means of the following assumptions: (1) the subjects use decision functions in reacting to the stimuli, although they may be not fully aware of this; (2) learning is the result of successive transformations of these decisions in the course of time; (3) the changes have specific probabilities and are related to (a) those responses which are made to the latest stimuli, and (b) a differential probability for decision functions which were effective, or only interrupted painful reinforcement, or were completely ineffective.In schizophrenics further factors of importance were (1) an inertia factor and (2) the rigidly continued use of unsuccessful or only partially successful decision criteria.The authors used a systems theory based on Galois field theory and a calculus of operators specifying three groups of subjects. A computer program based on these hypotheses was tested in a simulation experiment.The statistical evaluation of the results showed a congruence between the theoretical approach and the experimental data.This work was carried out with financial support from the Institute de Alta Cultura, Lisbon, between 1970 and 1974     

Quantitation of adriamycin in plasma and urine: comparative study of radioimmunoassay and high-performance liquid chromatography methods

The response of tumours to adriamycin, and the cardiotoxicity of the drug, may be related to its pharmacokinetics and plasma levels. Rapid and sensitive methods of adriamycin determination in plasma and urine samples are thus needed. A comparative study shows that high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorimetric detection is a reliable and specific method, but it is relatively slow and sometimes lacks sensitivity. A commercially-available radioimmunoassay kit is convenient, but there is a cross reaction with the major metabolise adriamycinol and unless the assay is combined with an extraction step, it gives erroneously high results.     

Detrimental effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage-iiib carcinoma of the cervix - results of a randomized trial

With the objective of testing the value of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage III B carcinoma of the cervix, we began in 1984 a randomized, phase III trial comparing BOMP chemotherapy followed by pelvic radiotherapy versus pelvic radiotherapy alone. Patients were stratified by age, extension of parametrial involvement, and lymphangiographic findings. Despite a higher complete response rate, the overall 5-year survival was significantly inferior in the combined therapy group (39% vs 23%, P=0.02). Toxicity was more pronounced in the chemoradiation arm and 4 patients developed fatal pulmonary complications. Patterns of failure were similar in both groups. The use of primary chemotherapy in advanced carcinoma of the cervix was detrimental to the patients and its use outside a protocol setting is discouraged.