A comparison of treatment planning techniques for low-dose-rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to compare low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy treatment plans created using three retrospectively applied planning techniques with plans delivered to patients.Methods and MaterialsTreatment plans were created retrospectively on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) scans for 26 patients. The technique dubbed 4D Brachytherapy was applied, using TRUS and MRI to obtain prostatic measurements required for the associated webBXT online nomogram. Using a patient's MRI scan to create a treatment plan involving loose seeds was also explored. Plans delivered to patients were made using an intraoperative loose seed TRUS-based planning technique. Prostate V₁₀₀ (%), prostate V₁₅₀ (%), prostate D₉₀ (Gy), rectum D_0.1cc (Gy), rectum D_2cc (Gy), urethra D₁₀ (%), urethra D₃₀ (%), and prostate volumes were measured for each patient. Statistical analysis was used to assess and compare plans.ResultsProstate volumes measured by TRUS and MRI were significantly different. Prostate volumes calculated by the webBXT online nomogram using TRUS- and MRI-based measurements were not significantly different. Compared with delivered plans, TRUS-based 4D Brachytherapy plans showed significantly lower rectum D_0.1cc (Gy) values, MRI-based 4D Brachytherapy plans showed significantly higher prostate V₁₀₀ (%) values and significantly lower rectum D_0.1cc (Gy), urethra D₁₀ (%), and urethra D₃₀ (%) values, and loose seed MRI-based plans showed significantly lower prostate V₁₀₀ (%), prostate D₉₀ (Gy), rectum D_0.1cc (Gy), rectum D_2cc (Gy), urethra D₁₀ (%), and urethra D₃₀ (%) values.ConclusionsTRUS-based 4D Brachytherapy plans showed similar dosimetry to delivered plans; rectal dosimetry was superior. MRI can be integrated into the 4D Brachytherapy workflow. The webBXT online nomogram overestimates the required number of seeds.     

Correction to: Prenatal attachment: Using measurement invariance to test the validity of comparisons across eight culturally diverse countries

Archives of Women's Mental Health - A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-021-01122-7     

Improved glycaemic control with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibition in patients with type 2 diabetes: vildagliptin (LAF237) dose response

OBJECTIVE: A novel treatment option for diabetic patients is the enhancement of incretin hormone activity by inhibition of the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4). This study was designed to establish a dose of the DPP-4-inhibitor vildagliptin (LAF237) that was effective in reducing HbA1c levels and was safe and well tolerated in patients with type 2 diabetes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study of 279 patients with type 2 diabetes consisted of a 4-week run-in phase where patients received placebo and a 12-week active treatment phase where they received one of the following dosages of vildagliptin: 25 mg twice daily, 25, 50 or 100 mg once daily (qd), or placebo. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant reduction in HbA1c levels in the vildagliptin 50 mg qd (p=0.003) and 100 mg qd groups (p=0.004) compared with the placebo group. The mean 4-h postprandial glucose level was significantly reduced from placebo in the vildagliptin 50 mg qd group (p = 0.012) and mean 4-h postprandial insulin was significantly increased from baseline vs. placebo in the vildagliptin 100 mg qd group (p=0.022). The assessment of beta-cell function (HOMA-B) was significantly increased in the vildagliptin 100 mg qd treatment group (p=0.007). The incidence of adverse events was similar in all treatment groups including placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Vildagliptin, at 50 and 100 mg qd, was effective in reducing HbA1c levels compared with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes. Vildagliptin at dosages up to 100 mg qd appeared safe and well tolerated.