Recent evidence suggests that increased plasma prolactin (PRL) levels could be modifying the synthesis and release of catecholamines (CA) from the adrenal medulla. In order to study this possibility, female rats bearing an anterior pituitary gland, from a litter-mate donor, under the right kidney capsule since day 30 of life and their sham-operated controls were sacrificed by decapitation 45 days after the transplant operation. Plasma PRL and CA levels and CA content in the adrenal medulla were analyzed. A significant increase in plasma PRL levels was shown in grafted (22 +/- 2 micrograms/l) when compared to control rats (6 +/- 0.3 micrograms/l), together with a significant increase in plasma norepinephrine (NE) (4.2 +/- 1.1 micrograms/l vs. 1.7 +/- 0.7 micrograms/l) and epinephrine (E) (2.9 +/- 0.6 micrograms/l vs. 1.6 +/- 0.2 micrograms/l). Similar plasma dopamine (DA) levels were found in both groups (0.6 +/- 0.2 micrograms/l vs. 0.8 +/- 0.3 micrograms/l). An increase in adrenal DA content (29.1 +/- 6.8 ng/mg protein), together with a decrease in NE (33.3 +/- 6.8 ng/mg protein) and E content (65.9 +/- 11.8 ng/mg protein) was detected in grafted as compared to control rats (DA: 12.0 +/- 3.6 ng/mg protein; NE: 79.3 +/- 22.1 ng/mg protein; E: 184.2 +/- 39.2 ng/mg protein). We can conclude from these data that the elevation of circulating PRL levels induced by a pituitary graft is able to increase the synthesis and release of CA from the adrenal medulla in female rats. 相似文献
Cervical smears were reviewed from patients in whom a cytological abnormality was followed, after an interval without interference, either by regression to `negative' or else by progression to invasive carcinoma. Twenty-eight cases were from a previously analysed series with positive smears and an interval of at least two years before investigation, resulting from refusal or failure to trace. Slides were also reviewed from 25 cases in which `positive' smears had regressed to negative without escaping from surveillance, and from 10 patients subsequently developing invasive carcinoma whose previous slides, taken several years earlier, showed abnormalities on review. None of these 63 patients had any biopsy or other surgical procedure to the cervix between the initial smear and the outcome.
Slides showing `superficial cell dyskaryosis' and/or well-differentiated `parabasal cell dyskaryosis' were found only among the groups with subsequent regression. Those showing dissociated poorly differentiated dyskaryotic parabasal cells regressed to negative in two cases and progressed to invasion in nine. This suggests that many examples of spontaneous regression correspond to mild dysplasias which are not precancerous, and overdiagnosis must often have resulted in unnecessary surgical procedures in the past.
`Regressing' and `progressing' groups both included cases in which the spatula had removed coherent pieces of undifferentiated epithelium. These are difficult to interpret cytologically. In nine of them (including four which regressed) the cytological picture was that of carcinoma in situ. The remainder (14 cases) were probably examples of reserve cell hyperplasia, and it is noteworthy that, of the 21 cases subsequently progressing to invasive carcinoma, five were preceded by appearances of this type. It is concluded that cell aggregates suggesting an unusual degree of reserve cell hyperplasia are a danger signal and require careful surveillance.