Modulation of c-kit expression in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A novel stem cell marker responsible for the progression of the disease

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal cancers because of late symptoms and resistance to chemotherapy and radiation therapy. We have investigated the appearance of c-kit, a stem cell marker, in both normal adult pancreatic tissue and in cancerous tissue. Apart from some very pale staining of islets of Langerhans, normal pancreas was devoid of staining with antibodies to c-kit. In contrast, in cancerous tissue that still preserves the overall integrity of the pancreatic tissue, there was a clear labeling in islets of Langerhans, which seemed to be co-localized with insulin containing β cells. In other cases, where the pancreatic tissue was completely deteriorated, intensive labeling was clearly evident in remnants of both the exocrine and the endocrine tissues. The duct cells of the adenocarcinoma were moderately but clearly labeled with antibodies to c-kit. In contrast, in metastasis of PDAC, very intensive labeling of c-kit was evident. The location of KRAS, which is strongly associated with PDAC, was also analyzed at the initial stages of the disease, when islets of Langerhans still preserve their integrity to a large extent. KRAS was found exclusively in islets of Langerhans and overlapped in its location with insulin and c-kit expressing cells. It is suggested that the modulation of the expression of c-kit, visualized by antibodies to the oncogene molecule, may play an important role in the formation and progression of PDAC. The absence of c-kit in normal pancreas and its appearance in PDAC is probably due to a mutational event, which probably allows conversion of the β cells into cancer stem cells (CSC). Co-expression of both c-kit and KRAS, typical markers for CSC with overlapping with insulin in islets of Langerhans, strongly support the notion that β-cells play a central role in the development of PDAC. The use of specific drugs that can attenuate the kinase activity of c-kit or target KRAS expressing cancer cells should be tested in order to attenuate the progression of this lethal disease.     

The association between systolic blood pressure reduction during clonidine suppression testing and the decrease in plasma catecholamines and metanephrines

Borderline isolated norepinephrine (NE) and normetanephrine (NMT) elevation is common among patients with suspected pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL). The clonidine suppression test (CST) may help establish the etiology in these cases. Prolonged laboratory processing and/or paucity of reliable biochemical assays may limit the utility of CST. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether blood pressure (BP) reduction during CST is associated with alterations in plasma NMT/NE, thereby potentially providing an immediate indication of CST results. In this cross‐sectional study, the authors included all consecutive patients with suspected PPGL who underwent CST from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2019. Linear regression models were conducted to evaluate the association between BP reduction and decrease in plasma NMT/NE. The final analysis included 36 patients (17 males). The decrease in systolic BP (SBP) 90 minutes postclonidine was associated with a decrease in plasma NMT (R = 0.668, P = .025) and NE (R = 0.562, P = .005). A 40% decrease in NMT and NE correlated with a 9.74% and 7.16% decrease in SBP, respectively. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that the association between SBP reduction and the decrease in plasma NMT (R = 0.764, P = .046) and NE (R = 0.714, P = .003) strengthens among patients with hypertension and among those with diabetes mellitus (R = 0.974, P = .026 for NMT). In conclusion, SBP reduction during CST is associated with plasma NMT and NE decrease. Therefore, the decrease in SBP 90 minutes postclonidine may serve as an immediate complementary clinical tool for PPGL diagnosis.     

Drug-induced hypertension: an unappreciated cause of secondary hypertension

A myriad variety of therapeutic agents or chemical substances can induce either a transient or persistent increase in blood pressure, or interfere with the blood pressure-lowering effects of antihypertensive drugs. Some agents cause either sodium retention or extracellular volume expansion, or activate directly or indirectly the sympathetic nervous system. Other substances act directly on arteriolar smooth muscle or do not have a defined mechanism of action. Some medications that usually lower blood pressure may paradoxically increase blood pressure, or an increase in pressure may be encountered after their discontinuation. In general, drug-induced pressure increases are small and transient: however, severe hypertension involving encephalopathy, stroke, and irreversible renal failure have been reported. The deleterious effect of therapeutic agents is more pronounced in patients with preexisting hypertension, in those with renal failure, and in the elderly. Careful evaluation of a patient's drug regimen may identify chemically induced hypertension and obviate unnecessary evaluation and facilitate antihypertensive therapy. Once chemical-induced hypertension has been identified, discontinuation of the causative agent is recommended, although hypertension can often be managed by specific therapy and dose adjustment if continued use of the offending agent is mandatory. The present review summarizes the therapeutic agents or chemical substances that elevate blood pressure and their mechanisms of action.     

Cell lineage analysis of acute leukemia relapse uncovers the role of replication-rate heterogeneity and microsatellite instability

Human cancers display substantial intratumoral genetic heterogeneity, which facilitates tumor survival under changing microenvironmental conditions. Tumor substructure and its effect on disease progression and relapse are incompletely understood. In the present study, a high-throughput method that uses neutral somatic mutations accumulated in individual cells to reconstruct cell lineage trees was applied to hundreds of cells of human acute leukemia harvested from multiple patients at diagnosis and at relapse. The reconstructed cell lineage trees of patients with acute myeloid leukemia showed that leukemia cells at relapse were shallow (divide rarely) compared with cells at diagnosis and were closely related to their stem cell subpopulation, implying that in these instances relapse might have originated from rarely dividing stem cells. In contrast, among patients with acute lymphoid leukemia, no differences in cell depth were observed between diagnosis and relapse. In one case of chronic myeloid leukemia, at blast crisis, most of the cells at relapse were mismatch-repair deficient. In almost all leukemia cases, > 1 lineage was observed at relapse, indicating that diverse mechanisms can promote relapse in the same patient. In conclusion, diverse relapse mechanisms can be observed by systematic reconstruction of cell lineage trees of patients with leukemia.     

Role of endoscopy in patients with diverticular disease

Acute diverticulitis occurs in 10-25% of patients with diverticulosis. Colonoscopy is advised 6 weeks after an attack of acute diverticulitis in order to completely evaluate the colonic lumen and exclude a potential malignancy. We conducted several studies aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of early colonoscopy in patients with acute diverticulitis. Consecutive patients hospitalized for acute diverticulitis were included. In the first phase of the study, patients with adjacent peri-diverticular air/fluid on CT were excluded. In the second phase of the study, we included patients with peri-diverticular air/fluid on CT as well. During the first phase of the study, 39 patients underwent uneventful colonoscopy. During the second phase of the study, 40 patients underwent colonoscopy and 1 of 6 patients with peri-diverticular air had perforation of her sigmoid colon. Two patients had a more protracted course and were clearly those who benefited most from the early colonoscopy. Based on our study, we concluded that early colonoscopy in acute diverticulitis is feasible. It should be reserved either for all patients with no air adjacent to diverticuli on CT or just for those with a more protracted course. In the third phase, a prospective randomized study was conducted on patients with acute diverticulitis with no peri-diverticular air. Such patients were randomized into those who underwent early colonoscopy and those who underwent colonoscopy 6 weeks later. Eighty-three patients were included in both groups and in none has a significant lesion been identified (except polyps). It seems therefore that the current abdominal CT with its excellent resolution is enough to exclude colonic cancer. Colonoscopy should be reserved only for patients with a protracted unresolved course of acute diverticulitis.