Reciprocal behaviour associated with altered homeostasis and photosensitivity of Drosophila clock mutants

The circadian oscillators of genetically short-period and long-period Drosophila exhibit reciprocal behaviour in four distinct ways: (1) with respect to the dependence of period on temperature, (2) in the change of period during constant darkness after ten days of constant light, (3) in the change of period during the second ten days of darkness as compared with the period during the first ten days, and (4) in the period change resulting from exposure to low-intensity constant light. The homeostatic control of the dependence of period length on temperature is impaired in the mutants as compared with wild-type files. The normal Drosophila pacemaker may comprise two mutually coupled oscillators, whereas the mutants may represent a reduction in activity of one or the other constituent oscillator.     

Short‐term effects of heat and cold on respiratory drug use. A time‐series epidemiological study in A Coruña,Spain

The consumption of medication, especially over‐the‐counter drugs, can reflect environmental exposure with a lesser degree of severity in terms of morbidity. The non‐linear effects of maximum and minimum apparent temperature on respiratory drug sales in A Coruña from 2006 to 2010 were examined using a distributed lag nonlinear model. In particular, low apparent temperatures proved to be associated with increased sales of respiratory drugs. The strongest consistent risk estimates were found for minimum apparent temperatures in respiratory drug sales with an increase of 33.4% (95% CI, 12.5%‐58.0%) when the temperature changed from 2.8°C to ?1.4 °C. These findings may serve to guide the planning of public health interventions to predict and manage the health effects of exposure to the thermal environment for lower degrees of morbidity. More precisely, significant increases in the use of measured over‐the‐counter medication could be used to identify and anticipate influenza outbreaks due to a more sensitive degree of the data source.     

Management of access to branded psychotropic medications in private health plans

BACKGROUND: In the past decade, health insurers have increased their reliance on cost control policies such as prior authorization and 3-tier formularies. Little is known about how these policies are being applied to psychotropic medications, many of which have low rates of patient adherence. OBJECTIVE: This study reports on plans' cost-sharing tier placement and authorization policies for 12 brand only psychotropic medications in 3 classes: antidepressants, anti-psychotics, and medications for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADFID). METHODS: Data were from a nationally representative survey of private health plans regarding mental health and substance-abuse services in 2003; 368 plans responded (83% response rate). Results were weighted and represent national estimates of health-plan characteristics. RESULTS: The majority of insurance products provided unrestricted placement on Tier 2 (medium copayment) for at least 2 brand-only antidepressants and at least 2 brand-only antipsychotics. This approach allows clinicians some limited leeway in initial medication selection. However, most patients who did not respond to the Tier-2 options typically faced a substantial escalation in copayment (Tier 3), possibly leading to premature medication discontinuation. For ADHI)5 the options were considerably more limited, with 22.1% of products applying some restriction to all 3 medications and only 15.9% of products leaving all 3 medications unrestricted. Plans with specialty contracts for mental health were considerably more likely to use Tier 3 (highest copayment) as their only restriction approach. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of this analysis,private plans were managing psychotropic costs using copayment incentives rather than administrative controls. This approach was less intrusive for clinicians, but resulting higher copayments could worsen already high rates of nonadherence; future research should examine this issue.     

Counter incision is a safe and effective method for alternative reservoir placement during inflatable penile prosthesis surgery

BackgroundAlternative reservoir placement is increasingly popular during inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) surgery to prevent intraperitoneal positioning, bowel, bladder, or vascular injury in patients with prior pelvic surgeries. Counter incision (CI) can be used for submuscular reservoir placement in high risk patients, however series exploring the safety remain limited.MethodsA database of IPP surgeries was queried for use of a CI during reservoir placement to compare 90-day clinical outcomes in a retrospective case-control study. Primary outcome was device infections, with secondary outcomes including reservoir herniation, hematoma, device malfunction rates, and operative times. Groups were compared using Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-Squared tests, with multivariate logistic regression models to identify predictors of infectious complications.ResultsA total of 534 cases met criteria, of which 51 (9.6%) used a CI for reservoir placement. The CI cohort included significantly more removal and replacements, 45.1% vs. 20.9% (P<0.001). Thirty-one CI patients (61.0%) had undergone prior prostatectomy compared to 134 (27.7%) non-CI patients (P=0.001). The most common reasons for CI were prior prostatectomy and inguinal hernia repair. Median operative time was 17 minutes longer in the CI group (74 vs. 57 minutes, P<0.001). Device infection rates were similar (2.0% vs. 4.1%, P=0.71), as were rates of hematoma (5.9% vs. 2.7%, P=0.19), and device malfunction (0.0% vs. 1.4% P=1.00).ConclusionsComplication rates were similar between CI and non-CI cohorts, even in a subset where approximately half the cases were removal and replacements. For physicians not comfortable with alternative placement through a penoscrotal or infrapubic incision, this offers a reasonable alternative and permits use of three-piece devices in patients with a hostile pelvis.