Hypertension Awareness and Control Among Young Adults in the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health

BACKGROUND

Young adults are less likely than older adults to be aware they have hypertension or to be treated for hypertension.

OBJECTIVE

To describe rates of hypertension awareness and control in a cohort of young adults and understand the impact of health insurance, utilization of preventive care, and self-perception of health on rates of hypertension awareness and control in this age group.

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

Cross-sectional study of 13,512 young adults participating in Wave IV of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health in 2007–2008.

MAIN MEASURES

We defined hypertension as an average of two measured systolic blood pressures (SBP) ≥ 140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressures (DBP) ≥ 90 mmHg, or self-report of hypertension. We defined hypertension awareness as reporting having been told by a health care provider that one had high blood pressure, and assessed awareness among those with uncontrolled hypertension. We considered those aware of having hypertension controlled if their average measured SBP was < 140 mmHg and DBP was < 90 mmHg.

KEY RESULTS

Of the 3,303 young adults with hypertension, 2,531 (76 %) were uncontrolled, and 1,893 (75 %) of those with uncontrolled hypertension were unaware they had hypertension. After adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity, weight status, income, education, alcohol and tobacco use, young adults with uncontrolled hypertension who had (vs. didn’t have) routine preventive care in the past 2 years were 2.4 times more likely (95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.68–3.55) to be aware, but young adults who believed they were in excellent (vs. less than excellent) health were 64 % less likely to be aware they had hypertension (OR 0.36, 95 % CI 0.23–0.57). Neither preventive care utilization nor self-rated health was associated with blood pressure control.

CONCLUSIONS

In this nationally representative group of young adults, rates of hypertension awareness and control were low. Efforts to increase detection of hypertension must address young adults’ access to preventive care and perception of their need for care.     

National Patterns of Risk-Standardized Mortality and Readmission After Hospitalization for Acute Myocardial Infarction,Heart Failure,and Pneumonia: Update on Publicly Reported Outcomes Measures Based on the 2013 Release

BACKGROUND

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publicly reports risk-standardized mortality rates (RSMRs) within 30-days of admission and, in 2013, risk-standardized unplanned readmission rates (RSRRs) within 30-days of discharge for patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), and pneumonia. Current publicly reported data do not focus on variation in national results or annual changes.

OBJECTIVE

Describe U.S. hospital performance on AMI, HF, and pneumonia mortality and updated readmission measures to provide perspective on national performance variation.

DESIGN

To identify recent changes and variation in national hospital-level mortality and readmission for AMI, HF, and pneumonia, we performed cross-sectional panel analyses of national hospital performance on publicly reported measures.

PARTICIPANTS

Fee-for-service Medicare and Veterans Health Administration beneficiaries, 65 years or older, hospitalized with principal discharge diagnoses of AMI, HF, or pneumonia between July 2009 and June 2012. RSMRs/RSRRs were calculated using hierarchical logistic models risk-adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities, and patients’ clustering among hospitals.

Results

Median (range) RSMRs for AMI, HF, and pneumonia were 15.1% (9.4–21.0%), 11.3% (6.4–17.9%), and 11.4% (6.5–24.5%), respectively. Median (range) RSRRs for AMI, HF, and pneumonia were 18.2% (14.4–24.3%), 22.9% (17.1–30.7%), and 17.5% (13.6–24.0%), respectively. Median RSMRs declined for AMI (15.5% in 2009–2010, 15.4% in 2010–2011, 14.7% in 2011–2012) and remained similar for HF (11.5% in 2009–2010, 11.9% in 2010–2011, 11.7% in 2011–2012) and pneumonia (11.8% in 2009–2010, 11.9% in 2010–2011, 11.6% in 2011–2012). Median hospital-level RSRRs declined: AMI (18.5% in 2009–2010, 18.5% in 2010–2011, 17.7% in 2011–2012), HF (23.3% in 2009–2010, 23.1% in 2010–2011, 22.5% in 2011–2012), and pneumonia (17.7% in 2009–2010, 17.6% in 2010–2011, 17.3% in 2011–2012).

Conclusions

We report the first national unplanned readmission results demonstrating declining rates for all three conditions between 2009–2012. Simultaneously, AMI mortality continued to decline, pneumonia mortality was stable, and HF mortality experienced a small increase.     

Virulence of major periodontal pathogens and lack of humoral immune protection in a rat model of periodontal disease

Oral Diseases (2010) 16 , 686–695 Objective: This study was designed to test the hypothesis that periodontal pathogens Tannerella forsythia and Porphyromonas gingivalis are synergistic in terms of virulence potential using a model of mixed‐microbial infection in rats. Materials and methods: Three groups of rats were infected orally with either T. forsythia or P. gingivalis in mono‐bacterial infections or as mixed‐microbial infections for 12 weeks and a sham‐infected group were used as a control. This study examined bacterial infection, inflammation, immunity, and alveolar bone loss changes with disease progression. Results: Tannerella forsythia and P. gingivalis genomic DNA was detected in microbial samples from infected rats by PCR indicating their colonization in the rat oral cavity. Primary infection induced significantly high IgG, IgG2b, IgG1, and IgG2a antibody levels indicating activation of mixed Th1 and Th2 immune responses. Rats infected with the mixed‐microbial consortium exhibited significantly increased palatal horizontal and interproximal alveolar bone loss. Histological examinations indicated significant hyperplasia of the gingival epithelium with moderate inflammatory infiltration and apical migration of junctional epithelium. The results observed differ compared to uninfected controls. Conclusion: Our results indicated that T. forsythia and P. gingivalis exhibit virulence, but not virulence synergy, resulting in the immuno‐inflammatory responses and lack of humoral immune protection during periodontitis in rats.     

Bioresorbable vascular scaffold to treat in‐stent restenosis: Single‐center experience

Aims

The management of patients with in‐stent restenosis (ISR) is still a major clinical challenge even in the era of drug‐eluting stents (DES). Recent studies have demonstrated acceptable clinical outcomes for the everolimus‐eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) ABSORB? in patients with stable coronary artery disease but data are scarce on its use in patients with ISR. We report the long‐term results of our preliminary experience with this novel approach at our institution.

Methods and Results

We investigated the safety and efficacy of BVS implantation to treat ISR. 34 consecutive patients (37 lesions) underwent PCI for ISR with BVS implantation between May 2013 and June 2015 at our institution and were included in the current analysis. Follow‐up was available in 91.9% of the patients. Mean follow‐up period was 801.9 ± 179 days. One patient had definite scaffold thrombosis (ScT) 2 months after stent implantation which was treated with DES. Five patients (six lesions) experienced target lesion revascularization (TLR). The composite endpoint rate of TLR, ScT, myocardial infarction, and death occured in 6/37 lesions at follow‐up (16.2%).

Conclusions

These real‐world data using BVS in patients with ISR demonstrates that ISR treatment with ABSORB? BVS is feasible but could have slightly higher target lesion failure rates as compared to DES. This proof of concept could be hypothesis‐generating for larger randomized controlled studies.

     

Comparison of the effects of gelatin,Ringer’s solution and a modern hydroxyl ethyl starch solution after coronary artery bypass graft surgery

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of 6% hydroxyl ethyl starch solution with 4% gelatin and Ringer’s solutions on the haemodynamic stability of patients after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and immediately after discontinuation of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

Methods

This was a randomised, double-blind clinical trial of 92 patients who were candidates for on-pump CABG. After discontinuation of CPB, all patients were transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) and divided randomly into three groups. The first group received Ringer’s solution, the second group 4% gelatin, and the third 6% hydroxyl ethyl starch (HES) solution (Voluven). Haemodynamic parameters such as heart rate, mean arterial pressure, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, central venous pressure, cardiac output and the presence of arrhythmias were documented.

Results

The volume needed for maintaining normal blood pressure and central venous pressure in the range of 10–14 mmHg was less in the HES group than in the other groups. The volume was similar however in the gelatin and Ringer’s groups in the first 24 hours after surgery. Urinary output in the first four and 24 hours after surgery were significantly higher in the HES group than in the other two groups. Mean creatinine levels were significantly lower in the HES group.

Conclusion

HES (6%) had a better volume-expanding effect than gelatin (4%) and Ringer’s solutions, and its short-term effects on renal function were also better than gelatin and Ringer’s solutions.