Traumatic brain injury and adrenal insufficiency: morning cortisol and cosyntropin stimulation tests

Introduction

Adrenal insufficiency (AI) has a great impact on the prognosis of patients with traumatic brain injury. There is a lack of consensus regarding the diagnostic criteria of AI. In these patients with acute stress we compared fasting cortisol, low and high dose cosyntropin stimulation tests to assess adrenal function in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.

Material and methods

This multicenter, cross-sectional study recruited 50 consecutive patients (aged between 15 and 70 years old) with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury who survived more than 5 days after the event. The patients’ adrenal function was assessed using the fasting cortisol, 1 and 250-µg ACTH stimulation tests.

Results

More cases of AI were detected by the 1-µg ACTH stimulation test compared to those detected by the basal serum cortisol level and 250-µg ACTH stimulation test. The κ test showed no agreement between these tests. The incidence of AI in the first 10 days after traumatic brain injury varied from 34% to 82% according to the various definitions of AI. The incidence of hypotension and need for vasopressors was higher in the patients diagnosed by the 250-µg ACTH stimulation test (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

The incidence of secondary AI in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury seems to be high. A combination of stimulation test (either 250 or 1 µg) and basal cortisol level may improve diagnostic ability compared to either test alone. Hence performing both tests for the assessment of adrenal function in patients with traumatic brain injury is recommended.     

Compound heterozygosity in the GALC gene in a late onset Iranian patient with spastic paraparesis,peripheral neuropathy and leukoencephalopathy

Neurological Sciences -     

Experimental evaluation of ileal patch in delayed primary repair of penetrating colon injuries: An animal study

Primary repair of traumatic colonic perforation is progressively gaining acceptance as the best method of management. However, when delayed, the risk of infection-related complications may increase. Here, we present a new method of repairing colon perforation in the presence of peritonitis. Acute colon injury was simulated in 22 German shepherd dogs. The dogs were randomly divided into two groups of 11 and after 24 hours they were operated on. The perforations were repaired by subserosal suture technique. In the first group (group A), ileal patch was used. In the other group (group B), the colon was closed by debridement and anastomosis. After 6 weeks, the repairs were assessed on the basis of survival, gross and histological assessments. Nine (82%) dogs in group A and six (56%) in group B survived. Ileal patch utilization significantly decreased the mortality rate (p < 0.05). The cause of death in two group A dogs and five group B dogs was peritonitis and intra-abdominal abscess formation. None of the surviving dogs showed evidence of anastomotic leakage or breakdown. Small bowel patch used in primary repair of colon injury in the presence of peritonitis may decrease the risk of postoperative infection-related complications and the mortality rate.     

Injection of intrathecal normal saline in decreasing postdural puncture headache

Purpose

Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is the most common and still unresolved postoperative complication of spinal anesthesia. Although there are several positive results of intrathecal saline injection for the treatment of PDPH and prophylaxis after accidental dural puncture, the effect of deliberate intrathecal saline injection before spinal anesthesia has not been examined. The objective of our study was to evaluate the effect of prophylactic administration of intrathecal normal saline in decreasing PDPH.

Methods

One hundred healthy women (ASA physical status I) of age between 18 and 35 years scheduled for elective term cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were included. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. Group C received 2.5 ml (12.5 mg) hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5 % as a control, and group S received intrathecal normal saline 5 ml before intrathecal injection of 2.5 ml (12.5 mg) hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5 %. The incidence and severity of PDPH were assessed after 48 h and again 3–7 days after operation.

Results

Basal characteristics were statistically similar in both groups (P > 0.05). The incidences of moderate and severe PDPH during first postoperative 48 h were not different between the groups (P = 0.24). However, the frequency of PDPH after 3–7 days was statistically higher in group C in compared with group S (16 vs. 2 %, P = 0.03). Totally the frequency of PDPH was higher in group C (24 vs. 2 %, P = 0.002).

Conclusion

Administration of normal saline (5 ml) before intrathecal administration of hyperbaric bupivacaine as a preventive approach is an effective and simple way to minimize PDPH in patients undergoing cesarean section.     

Ectasia of the ascending aorta at the time of aortic valve surgery: replace or relax?

BACKGROUND: The fate of aortic ectasia associated with aortic valve disease is usually derived from the natural history of primitive aortic aneurysm. We evaluated the evolution of untreated aortic dilation following aortic valve replacement and analyzed risk factors for expansion. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients undergoing aortic valve replacement, with an aortic diameter 40 to 55 mm, were followed up for a mean of 42 +/- 28 months (median 36 months). Freedom from adverse events, velocity of aortic expansion and correlation between velocity and several potential risk factors were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean aortic diameter did not change over time (43 +/- 4 vs 44 +/- 12, p = NS). Velocity of aortic expansion correlated significantly with the diameter of the ascending aorta at the time of operation, with faster growth in patients with ascending aorta diameter > 50 mm (p = 0.0004). Patients with aortic regurgitation had a tendency to a faster aortic dilation compared to those with aortic stenosis (p = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS. In patients without other risk factors, prophylactic surgical treatment of the ectasic aorta seems advisable for diameters > 48 mm. For diameters < 43 mm no treatment is probably needed. Other aspects must be considered for appropriate surgical strategy in the interval between 43 and 48 mm. Patients with aortic regurgitation should be closely monitored.