Candesartan cilexetil: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in chronic heart failure and hypertension

The addition of candesartan cilexetil (Atacand, Amias, Blopress, Kenzen, Ratacand) to standard therapy for chronic heart failure (CHF) provided important clinical benefits at little or no additional cost in France, Germany and the UK, according to a detailed economic analysis focusing on major cardiovascular events and prospectively collected resource-use data from the CHARM-Added and CHARM-Alternative trials in patients with CHF and left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction. Results of a corresponding cost-effectiveness analysis showed that candesartan cilexetil was either dominant over placebo or was associated with small incremental costs per life-year gained, depending on the country and whether individual trial or pooled data were used. Preliminary data from a US cost-effectiveness analysis based on CHARM data also showed favourable results for candesartan cilexetil. Two cost-effectiveness analyses of candesartan cilexetil in hypertension have been published, both conducted in Sweden. Data from the SCOPE trial in elderly patients with hypertension, which showed a significant reduction in nonfatal stroke with candesartan cilexetil-based therapy versus non-candesartan cilexetil-based treatment, were incorporated into a Markov model and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of euro12 824 per QALY gained was calculated (2001 value). Another modelled cost-effectiveness analysis of candesartan cilexetil was based on the ALPINE trial, in which the incidence of new-onset diabetes was significantly lower in patients with newly diagnosed hypertension who were randomised to candesartan cilexetil (with or without felodipine) than among those who received hydrochlorothiazide (with or without atenolol). Although candesartan cilexetil was dominant over hydrochlorothiazide, the ALPINE cost-effectiveness analysis relied on a small number of clinical events and did not evaluate the incremental cost of candesartan cilexetil per life-year or QALY gained. In conclusion, despite some inherent limitations, economic analyses incorporating CHARM data and conducted primarily in Europe have shown that candesartan cilexetil appears to be cost effective when added to standard CHF treatment in patients with CHF and compromised LV systolic function. The use of candesartan cilexetil as part of antihypertensive therapy in elderly patients with elevated blood pressure was also deemed to be cost effective in a Swedish analysis, primarily resulting from a reduced risk of nonfatal stroke (as shown in the SCOPE study); however, the generalisability of results to other contexts has not been established. Cost-effectiveness analyses comparing candesartan cilexetil with ACE inhibitors or other angiotensin receptor blockers in CHF or hypertension are lacking, and results reported for candesartan cilexetil in a Swedish economic analysis of ALPINE data focusing on outcomes for diabetes require confirmation and extension.     

Extended-release intramuscular naltrexone

An extended-release intramuscular formulation of naltrexone that provides sustained release of the drug over a 28-day period has been developed with the aim of improving treatment adherence in patients treated with naltrexone for alcohol dependence. Biodegradable polylactide-co-glycolide polymer microspheres containing 34% w/w naltrexone are reconstituted in an aqueous suspension just prior to intramuscular administration. Extended-release intramuscular naltrexone 380 mg administered once every 4 weeks, in combination with psychosocial therapy, demonstrated superior efficacy to placebo plus psychosocial therapy in reducing the heavy drinking event rate (primary endpoint) in adult patients with alcohol dependence in a 6-month well controlled trial. Among the subset of patients who abstained completely from drinking during the 7 days prior to the first dose of medication (n = 53; 8% of the total study population), those treated with extended-release intramuscular naltrexone 380 mg had greater reductions in the number of drinking days and the number of heavy drinking days compared with placebo recipients. Treatment with extended-release intramuscular naltrexone 380 mg once every 4 weeks for up to 18 months was generally well tolerated, with infrequent treatment-related serious adverse events. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were nausea, injection site reaction and headache. The proportion of patients with clinically significant plasma transaminase elevations was not different between patients receiving extended-release intramuscular naltrexone and those receiving placebo.     

Travoprost/timolol

Travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination (travoprost/timolol) is a once-daily eyedrops solution comprising the prostaglandin F(2alpha) analogue travoprost and the beta-adrenoceptor antagonist timolol. It is indicated for the treatment of patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who are insufficiently responsive to topical beta-adrenoceptor antagonists or prostaglandin analogues. Once-daily travoprost/timolol had generally similar efficacy to travoprost plus timolol and was more effective than travoprost or timolol monotherapy in reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension in randomised, well designed studies. Both travoprost/timolol and latanoprost plus timolol maintained IOP control, and travoprost/timolol was shown to be noninferior to latanoprost/timolol in randomised, well designed studies. Travoprost/timolol was generally well tolerated, with a tolerability profile similar to those of travoprost plus timolol, travoprost or timolol monotherapy and latanoprost plus timolol. The majority of adverse events, such as ocular hyperaemia, were mild and resolved with or without treatment.     

Tacrolimus: a further update of its use in the management of organ transplantation

Extensive clinical use has confirmed that tacrolimus (Prograf) is a key option for immunosuppression after transplantation. In large, prospective, randomised, multicentre trials in adults and children receiving solid organ transplants, tacrolimus was at least as effective or provided better efficacy than cyclosporin microemulsion in terms of patient and graft survival, treatment failure rates and the incidence of biopsy-proven acute and corticosteroid-resistant rejection episodes. Notably, the lower incidence of rejection episodes after renal transplantation in tacrolimus recipients was reflected in improved cost effectiveness. In bone marrow transplant (BMT) recipients, the incidence of tacrolimus grade II-IV graft-versus-host disease was significantly lower with tacrolimus than cyclosporin treatment. Efficacy was maintained in renal and liver transplant recipients after total withdrawal of corticosteroid therapy from tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, with the incidence of acute rejection episodes at up to 2 years' follow-up being similar with or without corticosteroids. Tacrolimus provided effective rescue therapy in transplant recipients with persistent acute or chronic allograft rejection or drug-related toxicity associated with cyclosporin treatment. Typically, conversion to tacrolimus reversed rejection episodes and/or improved the tolerability profile, particularly in terms of reduced hyperlipidaemia. In lung transplant recipients with obliterative bronchiolitis, conversion to tacrolimus reduced the decline in and/or improved lung function in terms of forced expiratory volume in 1 second. Tolerability issues may be a factor when choosing a calcineurin inhibitor. Cyclosporin tends to be associated with a higher incidence of significant hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, hirsutism, gingivitis and gum hyperplasia, whereas the incidence of some types of neurotoxicity, disturbances in glucose metabolism, diarrhoea, pruritus and alopecia may be higher with tacrolimus treatment. Renal function, as assessed by serum creatinine levels and glomerular filtration rates, was better in tacrolimus than cyclosporin recipients at up to 5 years' follow-up. CONCLUSION: Recent well designed trials have consolidated the place of tacrolimus as an important choice for primary immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation and in BMT. Notably, in adults and children receiving transplants, tacrolimus-based primary immunosuppression was at least as effective or provided better efficacy than cyclosporin microemulsion treatment in terms of patient and graft survival, treatment failure and the incidence of acute and corticosteroid-resistant rejection episodes. The reduced incidence of rejection episodes in renal transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus translated into a better cost effectiveness relative to cyclosporin microemulsion treatment. The optimal immunosuppression regimen is ultimately dependent on balancing such factors as the efficacy of the individual drugs, their tolerability, potential for drug interactions and pharmacoeconomic issues.     

Spotlight on Trastuzumab in the Management of HER2-Positive Metastatic and Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Trastuzumab (Herceptin) is a humanized monoclonal antibody used in the treatment of breast cancer that overexpresses human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), which is associated with clinically aggressive disease and a poor prognosis.The addition of intravenous trastuzumab to first-line chemotherapy improved the time to disease progression, objective response rate, duration of response, and overall survival in randomized, multicenter trials in women with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. As such, trastuzumab has become the standard of care in this setting, despite its high acquisition cost and potential for cardiac events, and is licensed for use in combination with paclitaxel (Europe and the US) or docetaxel (Europe). In addition, trastuzumab monotherapy is approved for use in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who have previously received chemotherapy for their metastatic disease. Recent data from large phase III trials with trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting revealed significant improvements in disease-free and overall survival. Thus, trastuzumab is also rapidly becoming a standard component of adjuvant therapy for patients with HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer.     

Azithromycin extended release: a review of its use in the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis and community-acquired pneumonia in the US

Azithromycin is a macrolide antibacterial agent. The novel microspheres oral extended-release formulation (Zmax) is the first antibacterial drug approved in the US for administration as a single dose in adult patients with mild to moderate acute bacterial sinusitis (ABS) or community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). It has a broad spectrum of in vitro antibacterial activity against Gram-positive, Gram-negative and atypical pathogens that cause ABS and CAP infections (including Streptococcus pneumoniae), and achieves good tissue penetration. Azithromycin extended release is an effective and generally well tolerated treatment in patients with ABS or CAP. The clinical cure rates of a single 2.0 g dose of azithromycin extended release were noninferior to those obtained with a 10-day regimen of levofloxacin in patients with ABS, and with 7-day regimens of clarithromycin extended release or levofloxacin in patients with CAP. With a pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile well suited to administration as a single-dose regimen that may offer the advantage of improved compliance and convenience compared with once-daily longer-course regimens, azithromycin extended release is a new option in the empirical treatment of adult patients with mild or moderate ABS or CAP in the US.     

Therapies for narcolepsy with or without cataplexy: evidence-based review

(1) Narcolepsy is a rare disorder of unknown aetiology characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness and typically associated with cataplexy. It is extremely incapacitating, and frequently results in impaired psychosocial functioning and reduced work performance. Currently there is no cure for narcolepsy, so treatment focuses on control of symptoms.(2) Although the sympathomimetic stimulants, such as amphetamines or methylphenidate, are effective in improving excessive daytime sleepiness in patients with narcolepsy, they have the potential for dependence, have sometimes disabling sympathomimetic side-effects and are associated with tolerance.(3) To date, there is clear evidence of the efficacy of modafinil, armodafinil and sodium oxybate in patients with narcolepsy. Modafinil and armodafinil improve excessive daytime sleepiness symptoms and have little abuse potential, but have no effect on cataplexy, so other drugs, such as antidepressants, are required to control cataplexy attacks.(4) Sodium oxybate improves both excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy. However, there is potential for abuse and possibly dependence.     

Ustekinumab

? Ustekinumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds with high specificity and affinity to the cytokines interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23, thereby suppressing IL-12- and IL-23-mediated inflammation associated with psoriasis. ? In two large, phase III trials in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, significantly more subcutaneous ustekinumab 45 or 90 mg recipients (administered as two injections 4 weeks apart) than placebo recipients achieved a 75% improvement on the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) score at 12 weeks. ? Other efficacy measures, including the physician’s global assessment of clinical response at week 12, also favored ustekinumab over placebo. Psoriatic symptom control was maintained during ustekinumab maintenance therapy (administered once every 12 weeks) for up to 76 weeks. ? In a phase II trial in patients with active plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, signs and symptoms of arthritis and psoriatic symptom control were improved to a greater extent with ustekinumab than with placebo at 12 weeks, based on the proportion of patients achieving a 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology response criteria (arthritis) or PASI 75 (skin symptoms). ? Health-related quality of life, assessed using the Dermatology Life Quality Index and the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index, was improved to a significantly greater extent with ustekinumab than with placebo at week 12. ? Subcutaneous ustekinumab was generally well tolerated in clinical trials, with most treatment-emergent adverse events being of mild severity.