首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   186篇
  免费   18篇
  国内免费   1篇
临床医学   9篇
内科学   93篇
特种医学   2篇
外科学   64篇
综合类   3篇
预防医学   14篇
眼科学   1篇
药学   5篇
肿瘤学   14篇
  2023年   4篇
  2022年   2篇
  2021年   20篇
  2020年   8篇
  2019年   19篇
  2018年   22篇
  2017年   11篇
  2016年   16篇
  2015年   8篇
  2014年   10篇
  2013年   8篇
  2012年   6篇
  2011年   11篇
  2010年   4篇
  2009年   5篇
  2008年   8篇
  2007年   11篇
  2006年   8篇
  2005年   6篇
  2004年   2篇
  2003年   5篇
  2002年   3篇
  2001年   1篇
  2000年   2篇
  1999年   1篇
  1998年   1篇
  1992年   1篇
  1991年   2篇
排序方式: 共有205条查询结果,搜索用时 625 毫秒
31.
32.
33.
BackgroundPreoperative biliary drainage is considered essential in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) requiring major hepatectomy with biliary-enteric reconstruction. However, evidence for postoperative biliary drainage as to protect the anastomosis is currently lacking. This study investigated the impact of postoperative external biliary drainage on the development of post-hepatectomy biliary leakage and liver failure (PHLF).MethodsAll patients who underwent major liver resection for suspected PHC between 2000 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Biliary leakage and PHLF was defined as grade B or higher according to the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS) criteria.ResultsEighty-nine out of 125 (71%) patients had postoperative external biliary drainage. PHLF was more prevalent in the drain group (29% versus 6%; P = 0.004). There was no difference in the incidence of biliary leakage (32% versus 36%). On multivariable analysis, postoperative external biliary drainage was identified as an independent risk factor for PHLF (Odds-ratio 10.3, 95% confidence interval 2.1–50.4; P = 0.004).ConclusionsExternal biliary drainage following major hepatectomy for PHC was associated with an increased incidence of PHLF. It is therefore not recommended to routinely use postoperative external biliary drainage, especially as there is no evidence that this decreases the risk of biliary anastomotic leakage.  相似文献   
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.

Background

Gallstone disease is a frequent disorder in the Western world with a prevalence of 10–20%. Recommendations for the assessment and management of gallstones vary internationally. The aim of this systematic review was to assess quality of guideline recommendations for treatment of gallstones.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE and websites of relevant associations were systematically searched. Guidelines without a critical appraisal of literature were excluded. Quality of guidelines was determined using the AGREE II instrument. Recommendations without consensus or with low level of evidence were considered to define problem areas and clinical research gaps.

Results

Fourteen guidelines were included. Overall quality of guidelines was low, with a mean score of 57/100 (standard deviation 19). Five of 14 guidelines were considered suitable for use in clinical practice without modifications. Ten recommendations from all included guidelines were based on low level of evidence and subject to controversy. These included major topics, such as definition of symptomatic gallstones, indications for cholecystectomy and intraoperative cholangiography.

Conclusion

Only five guidelines on gallstones are evidence-based and of a high quality, but even in these controversy exists on important topics. High quality evidence is needed in specific areas before an international guideline can be developed and endorsed worldwide.  相似文献   
40.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号