Preoperative computed tomography assessment of skeletal muscle mass is valuable in predicting outcomes following hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

Background

Liver surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality.

Objectives

This study investigated the impact of low skeletal muscle mass on short- and longterm outcomes following hepatectomy for PHC.

Methods

Patients included underwent liver surgery for PHC between 1998 and 2013. Total skeletal muscle mass was measured at the level of the third lumbar vertebra using available preoperative computed tomography images. Sex-specific cut-offs for low skeletal muscle mass were determined by optimal stratification.

Results

In 100 patients, low skeletal muscle mass was present in 42 (42.0%) subjects. The rate of postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo Grade III and higher) was greater in patients with low skeletal muscle mass (66.7% versus 48.3%; multivariable adjusted P = 0.070). Incidences of sepsis (28.6% versus 5.2%) and liver failure (35.7% versus 15.5%) were increased in patients with low skeletal muscle mass. In addition, 90-day mortality was associated with low skeletal muscle mass in univariate analysis (28.6% versus 8.6%; P = 0.009). Median overall survival was shorter in patients with low muscle mass (22.8 months versus 47.5 months; P = 0.014). On multivariable analysis, low skeletal muscle mass remained a significant prognostic factor (hazard ratio 2.02; P = 0.020).

Conclusions

Low skeletal muscle mass has a negative impact on postoperative mortality and overall survival following resection of PHC and should therefore be considered in preoperative risk assessment.     

Pan-European survey on the implementation of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery with emphasis on cancer

Background

Minimally invasive (MI) pancreatic surgery appears to be gaining popularity, but its implementation throughout Europe and the opinions regarding its use in pancreatic cancer patients are unknown.

Methods

A 30-question survey was sent between June and December 2014 to pancreatic surgeons of the European Pancreatic Club, European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association and 5 European national pancreatic societies. Incomplete responses were excluded.

Results

In total, 237 pancreatic surgeons responded. After excluding 34 incomplete responses, 203 responses from 27 European countries were included. 164 (81%) surgeons were employed at a university hospital, 184 (91%) performed advanced MI surgery and 148 (73%) performed MI distal pancreatectomy. MI pancreatoduodenectomy was performed by 42 (21%) surgeons, whereas 9 (4.4%) surgeons had performed more than 10 procedures. Robot-assisted MI pancreatic surgery was performed by 28 (14%) surgeons. 63 (31%) surgeons expected MI distal pancreatectomy for cancer to be inferior to open distal pancreatectomy concerning oncological outcomes. 151 (74%) surgeons expected to benefit from training in MI distal pancreatectomy and 149 (73%) were willing to participate in a randomized trial on this topic.

Conclusions

MI distal pancreatectomy is a common procedure, although its use for cancer is still disputed. MI pancreatoduodenectomy is still an uncommon procedure. Specific training and a randomized trial regarding MI pancreatic cancer surgery are welcomed.     

Outcomes of Repeat Laparoscopic Liver Resection Compared to the Primary Resection

Background

Repeat laparoscopic liver resection (R-LLR) can be technically challenging. Data on this topic are scarce and many investigators would question its feasibility and outcomes. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety, feasibility, oncological efficiency and outcomes of R-LLR.

Methods

We reviewed a prospectively collected database of 403 patients undergoing 422 laparoscopic liver resections (LLRs) from August 2003 to August 2013. Data of 19 patients undergoing R-LLR were analyzed and compared to the primary resection (P-LLR) in these patients. Demographic and clinical data were studied. A subgroup analysis was done for minor resections.

Results

Twenty R-LLRs were performed in 19 patients (female 58 %; mean age: 57.5 years; age range: 23–79 years). Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) were the commonest indication for R-LLR (60 %), followed by neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases (NETLM) (20 %) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (10 %). The majority (90 %) of resections were for malignant disease (18/20). There were three conversions (15 %), and two patients developed complications (10 %). The operative time (p = 0.005) and blood loss (p = 0.03) were both significantly greater in R-LLR compared to P-LLR, whereas length of stay (median 4 days; p = 0.30) and complications (p = 0.58) did not differ between the groups. R0 resection rates for P-LLR and R-LLR were 95 and 90 %, respectively (p = 0.73).

Conclusions

Repeat LLR is safe, feasible, and can be performed with minimal morbidity. It appears to be technically more challenging than P-LLR, but without any increase in complications or length of hospital stay.     

Systematic review on the treatment of isolated local recurrence of pancreatic cancer after surgery; re-resection,chemoradiotherapy and SBRT

Background

The majority of patients who have undergone a pancreatic resection for pancreatic cancer develop disease recurrence within two years. In around 30% of these patients, isolated local recurrence (ILR) is found. The aim of this study was to systematically review treatment options for this subgroup of patients.

Research considerations in the evaluation of minimally invasive pancreatic resection (MIPR)

The IHPBA/AHPBA-sponsored 2016 minimally invasive pancreatic resection (MIPR) conference held on April 20th, 2016 included a session designed to evaluate what would be the most appropriate scientific contribution to help define the increasing role of MIPR internationally.Participants in the conference reviewed the assessment of numerous pertinent scientific designs including randomized controlled trial (RCT), pragmatic international RCT, registry-RCT, non-RCT with propensity matching, and various types of clinical registries including those aiming to create a quality improvement data system or a learning health care system. The strengths and weaknesses of each of these designs, the status of trials which are currently recruiting patients, and pragmatic considerations were evaluated.A recommendation was made to establish a clinical registry to collect data prospectively from around the world to assess current practices and provide a framework for future studies in MIPR.