Erg?nzung und Unterstützung zu konventionellen Tumortherapien

panorama

Bendamustin: Neuer Handelsname nach EU-Zulassung     

Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in the evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysms

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to evaluate abdominal aortic aneurysms in 27 patients. The findings were compared retrospectively with CT, ultrasound (US), and angiography in 17 cases and prospectively with US in 10 cases. MRI identified the renal arteries in all cases, demonstrated involvement at or above the origin of the renal arteries in eight patients, and showed extension of the aneurysm into the iliac arteries in 12 cases. The outer dimension of the aneurysm, the diameter of the residual lumen, and the length of the aneurysm were measured easily from the MR images. The measurements of transverse dimension of the abdominal aortic aneurysm were similar for MRI, CT, and US. MRI more accurately defined extension above the renal arteries and below the aortic bifurcation. It is concluded that MRI provides the necessary information for the surveillance and preoperative evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysms.     

Cardiac transplantations in dogs: evaluation with MR

To assess the potential of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging as an early predictor of cardiac transplant rejection, electrocardiogram-gated (ECG-gated) MR imaging was performed in 12 dogs with heterotopic cardiac transplants. Twenty-two examinations were performed in vivo, and ten postmortem examinations were performed immediately after the dogs were killed. Examinations were performed from 3 days to 14 weeks after transplantation. A 0.35-T superconducting magnet was used with the spin-echo pulse sequence. There was a significant increase (P less than .02 to P less than .001) in T2 relaxation times and intensity values for the transplanted hearts compared with native hearts at all time intervals after transplantation. T1 relaxation times of native and transplanted hearts showed no significant difference on the in vivo ECG-gated studies. However, T1 values calculated on post-mortem studies were significantly longer (P less than .005) in the transplanted compared with the native hearts. With longer pulse repetition and echo delay times, there was an increase in the contrast between the rejecting transplanted heart and the native heart. Thus, ECG-gated MR imaging using the spin-echo technique displays cardiac allograft rejection in vivo. The rejected myocardium in vivo is characterized by a prolonged T2 relaxation time.     

Mediastinal masses: MR imaging

Seventy-five patients with mediastinal masses were imaged with magnetic resonance (MR). Results were analyzed with regard to the ability of MR to demonstrate the masses, their morphology, and their encroachment or displacement of blood vessels and airways. T1 values were determined in 53 patients and T2 values in 59. Hydrogen density and percentage of contrast relative to muscle and fat were also obtained in 53 and 59 patients, respectively. MR images were compared with computed tomography (CT) scans, which were available in 45 patients. MR depicted all masses and demonstrated compromise of vessels and cardiac chambers owing to the inherent contrast between the masses and cardiovascular structures. Bronchogenic carcinoma had very long relaxation values for T1 and T2, while chronic inflammatory processes had intermediate values for T1 and T2, thus appearing less intense than bronchogenic carcinoma on T2-weighted images. Other neoplasms demonstrated T1 and T2 values between these two disease groups. Masses appeared less homogeneous on MR images than on CT scans, and vascular compromise was better assessed with MR. Thus, MR imaging is a completely noninvasive technique for the evaluation of mediastinal masses. While the anatomic information is comparable to that produced by CT, MR provides some insight into the composition of the mass.     

Aortic dissection: sensitivity and specificity of MR imaging

Gated transverse magnetic resonance (MR) images of 54 patients (35 male, 19 female; aged 16-90 years) with suspected or known aortic dissection were reviewed by three cardiac radiologists without knowledge of clinical details. The reviewers independently determined the presence or absence and the type of aortic dissection. A confidence level was assigned for each diagnosis, and receiver operating characteristic curves were generated. The reviewer with extensive MR experience correctly identified 96% of the proved aortic dissections and all of the normal cases; the reviewer with moderate experience identified 96% and 84%, respectively; and the reviewer with minimal experience, 78% and 94%. The sensitivity at a specificity level of 90% was determined for each reviewer (100%, 96%, and 83%, respectively). MR imaging is highly sensitive and specific in the diagnosis of aortic dissection but does require considerable experience because of the need to recognize flow artifacts.