首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   1947篇
  免费   151篇
  国内免费   19篇
耳鼻咽喉   17篇
儿科学   44篇
妇产科学   13篇
基础医学   191篇
口腔科学   108篇
临床医学   159篇
内科学   583篇
皮肤病学   22篇
神经病学   85篇
特种医学   51篇
外国民族医学   1篇
外科学   329篇
综合类   35篇
预防医学   80篇
眼科学   78篇
药学   197篇
中国医学   15篇
肿瘤学   109篇
  2024年   6篇
  2023年   44篇
  2022年   82篇
  2021年   118篇
  2020年   80篇
  2019年   107篇
  2018年   112篇
  2017年   51篇
  2016年   93篇
  2015年   94篇
  2014年   126篇
  2013年   131篇
  2012年   192篇
  2011年   184篇
  2010年   87篇
  2009年   68篇
  2008年   91篇
  2007年   95篇
  2006年   82篇
  2005年   64篇
  2004年   54篇
  2003年   44篇
  2002年   37篇
  2001年   12篇
  2000年   8篇
  1999年   6篇
  1998年   7篇
  1997年   3篇
  1996年   6篇
  1995年   6篇
  1994年   9篇
  1993年   4篇
  1992年   1篇
  1989年   2篇
  1988年   3篇
  1986年   2篇
  1984年   1篇
  1983年   2篇
  1981年   1篇
  1979年   1篇
  1973年   1篇
排序方式: 共有2117条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
21.
Objectives/BackgroundMedical therapy is the first line of treatment for intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) are mainly considered for those patients with severe stenosis and recurrent events despite aggressive medical therapy. In this review, we discuss the application of PTAS as a treatment option for ICAD and its future prospect.Materials and MethodsWe did the literature review of the key articles and guidelines to elaborate on the role of PTAS in the management of ICAD based on the current data and expert opinion. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus up to August 2020, and included articles published only in the English language.ResultsSince the publication of the results from SAMMPRIS and VISSIT trials, stenting is no longer recommended for secondary stroke prevention in patients with symptomatic ICAD. However, recent clinical studies on intracranial stenting for a subgroup of ICAD patients have shown promising results, likely due to better patient selection and continued advancement of endovascular techniques.ConclusionThere exists a lack of consensus regarding the best endovascular treatment approach (e.g., angioplasty alone or balloon mounted stent vs. self-expanding stent with or without prior angioplasty) or management of in-stent restenosis. Another area of clinical controversy relates to the ideal use and duration of antiplatelet therapy.  相似文献   
22.
23.
24.
25.
Lateral epicondylosis is common, with various treatment modalities. Platelet—rich—plasma injections from autologous blood have recently been used in centres worldwide for the treatment of tennis elbow. We review and present the recent published evidence on the effectiveness of PRP injections for lateral epicondylosis. Nine studies met our inclusion criteria including 6 RCT’s for the purpose of analysis. PRP injections have an important and effective role in the treatment of this debilitating pathology, in cases where physiotherapy has been unsuccessful.  相似文献   
26.

Background

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with poor prognosis. Gemcitabine is the standard chemotherapy for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (MPA). Randomized clinical trials evaluating intensified chemotherapies including FOLFIRINOX and nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (NAB+GEM) have shown improvement in survival. Here, we have evaluated the efficacy of intensified chemotherapy versus gemcitabine monotherapy in real-life settings across Europe.

Methods

A retrospective multi-center study including 1056 MPA patients, between 2012 and 2015, from nine centers in UK, Germany, Italy, Hungary and the Swedish registry was performed. Follow-up was at least 12 months. Cox proportional Harzards regression was used for uni- and multivariable evaluation of prognostic factors.

Results

Of 1056 MPA patients, 1030 (98.7%) were assessable for survival analysis. Gemcitabine monotherapy was the most commonly used regimen (41.3%), compared to FOLFIRINOX (n = 204, 19.3%), NAB+GEM (n = 81, 7.7%) and other gemcitabine- or 5-FU-based regimens (n = 335, 31.7%). The median overall survival (OS) was: FOLFIRINOX 9.9 months (95%CI 8.4–12.6), NAB+GEM 7.9 months (95%CI 6.2–10.0), other combinations 8.5 months (95%CI 7.7–9.3) and gemcitabine monotherapy 4.9 months (95%CI 4.4–5.6). Compared to gemcitabine monotherapy, any combination of chemotherapeutics improved the survival with no significant difference between the intensified regimens. Multivariable analysis showed an association between treatment center, male gender, inoperability at diagnosis and performance status (ECOG 1–3) with poor prognosis.

Conclusion

Gemcitabine monotherapy was predominantly used in 2012–2015. Intensified chemotherapy improved OS in comparison to gemcitabine monotherapy. In real-life settings, the OS rates of different treatment approaches are lower than shown in randomized phase III trials.  相似文献   
27.
28.
29.
30.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号