Survival and Functional Outcomes in Boys with Cerebral Adrenoleukodystrophy with and without Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy (CALD) is a rapidly progressing, often fatal neurodegenerative disease caused by mutations in the ABCD1 gene, resulting in deficiency of ALD protein. Clinical benefit has been reported following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We conducted a large multicenter retrospective chart review to characterize the natural history of CALD, to describe outcomes after HSCT, and to identify predictors of treatment outcomes. Major functional disabilities (MFDs) were identified as having the most significant impact on patients’ abilities to function independently and were used to assess HSCT outcome. Neurologic function score (NFS) and Loes magnetic resonance imaging score were assessed. Data were collected on 72 patients with CALD who did not undergo HSCT (untreated cohort) and on 65 patients who underwent transplantation (HSCT cohort) at 5 clinical sites. Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates of 5-year overall survival (OS) from the time of CALD diagnosis were 55% (95% confidence interval [CI], 42.2% to 65.7%) for the untreated cohort and 78% (95% CI, 64% to 86.6%) for the HSCT cohort overall (P?=?.01). KM estimates of 2-year MFD-free survival for patients with gadolinium-enhanced lesions (GdE⁺) were 29% (95% CI, 11.7% to 48.2%) for untreated patients (n?=?21). For patients who underwent HSCT with GdE⁺ at baseline, with an NFS ≤1 and Loes score of 0.5 to ≤9 (n?=?27), the 2-year MFD-free survival was 84% (95% CI, 62.3% to 93.6%). Mortality rates post-HSCT were 8% (5 of 65) at 100days and 18% (12 of 65) at 1 year, with disease progression (44%; 7 of 16) and infection (31%; 5 of 16) listed as the most common causes of death. Adverse events post-HSCT included infection (29%; 19 of 65), acute grade II-IV graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (31%; 18 of 58), and chronic GVHD (7%; 4 of 58). Eighteen percent of the patients (12 of 65) experienced engraftment failure after their first HSCT. Positive predictors of OS in the HSCT cohort may include donor-recipient HLA matching and lack of GVHD, and early disease treatment was predictive of MFD-free survival. GdE⁺ status is a strong predictor of disease progression in untreated patients.? This study confirms HSCT as an effective treatment for CALD when performed early. We propose survival without MFDs as a relevant treatment goal, rather than solely assessing OS as an indicator of treatment success.     

In vitro expression of vital virulent genes of clinical and environmental isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans/gattii in endothelial cells of human blood-brain barrier

BackgroundEvaluation of the pathogenesis of clinical and environmental cryptococcal isolates to the central nervous system is necessary for understanding the risk. This study was designed to determine the in vitro expression of six important virulent genes of Cryptococcus neoformans/gattii in Human Brain Microvascular Endothelial cells (hBMEC).MethodsThe hBMEC were infected with Cryptococcus to determine invasion and survival rate at 3, 12 and 24 hours by subsequent colony count of internalized yeasts. The whole RNA of the intracellular Cryptococcus was extracted to quantify the expression of CAP10, PLB1, ENA1, URE1, LAC1, and MATα genes by real-time quantitative PCR for 3 and 12 hours of infection.ResultsInvasion and survival rates were higher in clinical and standard strains of C. neoformans. A significant difference was observed among the clinical and environmental isolates for the expression of CAP10, ENA1, LAC1, MATα and URE1 at 3 hours, and ENA1, LAC1, MATα, PLB1 and URE1 at 12 hours. Clinical isolates showed significant upregulation of all the genes except PLB1, which was higher in environmental isolates. Relative expressions at the two time-points showed statistically significant (P = 0.043) changes for the clinical isolates and no significance (P = 0.063) for environmental isolates.ConclusionThe C. gattii (VGI) isolates showed significantly lower invasion and survival than C. neoformans (VNI, and VNII) irrespective of their sources. Clinical isolates exhibited higher expression for the majority of the virulent genes until 12 hours of infection, probably due to their better adaptation in the host system and enhanced pathogenicity than the environmental counterparts.     

Fidaxomicin versus oral vancomycin for severe Clostridium difficile infection: a retrospective cohort study

ObjectivesThis study was conducted to compare clinical outcomes of fidaxomicin versus oral vancomycin in the management of severe Clostridium difficile infection (CDI).MethodsThe investigation was a retrospective, multicentre, propensity score-matched analysis using a national clinical administrative database. Veterans treated for severe CDI from any Veterans Affairs Medical Center between 1 June 2011 and 30 June 2017 were included if they received fidaxomicin or an oral vancomycin regimen for treatment. The two groups were matched by the nearest-neighbour method from a propensity score derived from independent variables associated with the selection of a fidaxomicin course.ResultsPropensity score matching resulted in two well-matched cohorts consisting of 213 fidaxomicin and 639 oral vancomycin courses. No statistically-significant difference was found for the primary outcome of combined clinical failure or recurrence (68/213 (31.9%) versus 163/639 (25.5%), respectively, p 0.071). Additionally, no statistically significant differences were found for the secondary outcomes of 30-day (23/213 (10.8%) versus 75/639 (11.7%), respectively, p 0.71), 90-day (48/213 (22.5%) versus 140/639 (21.9%), respectively, p 0.85), and 180-day mortality (62/213 (29.1%) versus 186/639 (29.1%), respectively, p 1.0) between the two treatment groups.ConclusionsCourses of fidaxomicin or oral vancomycin for severe CDI resulted in similar treatment outcomes. Study findings are consistent with current treatment guideline recommendations for the use of either agent in the management of severe CDI.     

Combining VITEK® 2 with colistin agar dilution screening assist timely reporting of colistin susceptibility

ObjectivesThe rise in carbapenem resistance among Gram-negative bacteria has renewed interest in colistin. Recently, the EUCAST-CLSI Polymyxin Breakpoints Working Group declared that broth microdilution (BMD) is the only valid method for colistin susceptibility testing. BMD is not easily incorporated into the routine work of clinical laboratories, and usually this test is incorporated serially, resulting in delayed susceptibility reporting. We tested a strategy of combining VITEK^® 2 with a 2 μg/mL colistin agar dilution (VITEK^® 2/AD) screening plate to improve performance and time to reporting of colistin susceptibility.MethodsColistin susceptibility for 364 clinical isolates was determined by VITEK^® 2/AD and compared with the reference standard BMD according to the ISO 20776-1:2007 and CLSI guidelines. The EUCAST colistin susceptibility breakpoint of ≤2 μg/mL was used. Escherichia coli NCTC 13846 served as quality control strain. Agreement, very major error (VME) and major error rates were determined using ISO 20776-2:2007.ResultsThe VME rate for VITEK^® 2 alone was 30.6% (15/49, 95% CI 18.3–45.4%), and was reduced to 10.2% (5/49, 95% CI 3.4–22.2%) using the VITEK^® 2/AD combined testing. The combined testing had categorical agreement with BMD of 97% (354/364, 95% CI 95.0–98.7%), and a major error (ME) rate of 1.6% (5/315, 95% CI 0.5–3.7%). Using the combined testing, even against challenging strains, 349 (95.8%, 95% CI 93.3–97.7%) colistin susceptibility results could be reported, and only 15 isolates required further analysis by BMD.DiscussionOur method is simple to apply and allows rapid reporting of colistin susceptibility.     

Fluoroquinolones versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for the treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundFluoroquinolones are a popular alternative to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections.ObjectivesTo compare the effects of fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole on mortality of S. maltophilia infections.Data sourcesPubMed and EMBASE.Study eligibility criteriaClinical studies reporting mortality outcomes of S. maltophilia infections.ParticipantsPatients with clinical infections caused by S. maltophilia.InterventionsFluoroquinolone monotherapy in comparison with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole monotherapy.MethodsSystematic review with meta-analysis technique.ResultsSeven retrospective cohort and seven case–control studies were included. Three cohort studies were designed to compare the two drugs, whereas others had other purposes. A total of 663 patients were identified, 332 of which were treated with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (50.1%) and 331 with fluoroquinolones (49.9%). Three cohort studies were designed to compare the effect of the two drugs, whereas the others had other purposes. Levofloxacin was most frequently used among fluoroquinolones (187/331, 56.5%), followed by ciprofloxacin (114/331, 34.4%). The overall mortality rate was 29.6%. Using pooled ORs for the mortality of each study, fluoroquinolone treatment (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39–0.99) was associated with survival benefit over trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole treatment, with low heterogeneity (I² = 18%). Specific fluoroquinolones such as ciprofloxacin (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.17–1.12) and levofloxacin (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.48–1.26) did not show a significant difference in comparison with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. In the sub-group analyses of adult and bacteraemic patients, significant differences in mortality were not observed between fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.ConclusionsBased on a meta-analysis of non-randomized studies, fluoroquinolones demonstrated comparable effects on mortality of S. maltophilia infection to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, supporting the use of fluoroquinolones in clinical S. maltophilia infections. Although the pooled analysis of overall studies favoured fluoroquinolones over trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, the studies included were observational, and sub-group analyses of certain fluoroquinolone agents did not show statistical differences with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Randomized clinical studies are needed to address these issues.     

Transmission events and antimicrobial susceptibilities of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus argenteus in Stockholm

ObjectivesStaphylococcus argenteus has been increasingly reported since the species was defined as a novel staphylococcal species in 2015. This study aims to investigate genetic epidemiological links and antimicrobial susceptibilities of methicillin-resistant S. argenteus isolates recovered in Stockholm.MethodsSixteen methicillin-resistant S. argenteus isolates were identified from a collection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Stockholm 2007–2018, by using whole-genome sequencing and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). The genomes of the isolates were investigated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based phylogeny, k-mer analysis, core-genome multi-locus sequence typing (cgMLST), resistance traits and virulence factors. The MICs of 19 antimicrobial agents for each isolate were determined by using the broth microdilution method.ResultsOf the 16 isolates, seven, seven and two isolates were assigned to ST1223, ST2250 and ST2793, respectively, with the S. aureus MLST-scheme. Analyses based on SNPs and cgMLST revealed a likely clonal spread of methicillin-resistant S. argenteus in 2007. Four isolates were found to be resistant to non-β-lactams in antimicrobial susceptibility testing.ConclusionsA transmission event of methicillin-resistant S. argenteus in family was identified by this study. Among our limited number of isolates, non-β-lactam resistance was detected, which highlights the necessity of a continued surveillance on this emerging pathogen. S. argenteus could be correctly identified by MALDI-TOF MS with the updated database, enabling its detection also in clinical laboratories.     

Operational models and criteria for incorporating microbial whole genome sequencing in hospital microbiology – A systematic literature review

BackgroundMicrobial whole genome sequencing (WGS) has many advantages over standard microbiological methods. However, it is not yet widely implemented in routine hospital diagnostics due to notable challenges.ObjectivesThe aim was to extract managerial, financial and clinical criteria supporting the decision to implement WGS in routine diagnostic microbiology, across different operational models of implementation in the hospital setting.MethodsThis was a systematic review of literature identified through PubMed and Web of Science. English literature studies discussing the applications of microbial WGS without limitation on publication date were eligible. A narrative approach for categorization and synthesis of the sources identified was adopted.ResultsA total of 98 sources were included. Four main alternative operational models for incorporating WGS in clinical microbiology laboratories were identified: full in-house sequencing and analysis, full outsourcing of sequencing and analysis and two hybrid models combining in-house/outsourcing of the sequencing and analysis components. Six main criteria (and multiple related sub-criteria) for WGS implementation emerged from our review and included cost (e.g. the availability of resources for capital and operational investment); manpower (e.g. the ability to provide training programmes or recruit trained personnel), laboratory infrastructure (e.g. the availability of supplies and consumables or sequencing platforms), bioinformatics requirements (e.g. the availability of valid analysis tools); computational infrastructure (e.g. the availability of storage space or data safety arrangements); and quality control (e.g. the existence of standardized procedures).ConclusionsThe decision to incorporate WGS in routine diagnostics involves multiple, sometimes competing, criteria and sub-criteria. Mapping these criteria systematically is an essential stage in developing policies for adoption of this technology, e.g. using a multicriteria decision tool. Future research that will prioritize criteria and sub-criteria that were identified in our review in the context of operational models will inform decision-making at clinical and managerial levels with respect to effective implementation of WGS for routine use. Beyond WGS, similar decision-making challenges are expected with respect to future integration of clinical metagenomics.