A method of limb elevation during burn surgery

Elevation of limbs during burns surgery to access the posterior aspect is routinely required. We describe a method of limb holding during burns surgery using sharp towel clips fixed to the distal phalanges of a patient's hands or feet. The limb is held in elevation using a sterile crepe bandage from the towel clips to a hook hung on a rail fixed to the theatre ceiling. We have used this technique for patients with extensive severe burns for many years with no significant damage to the nail beds or the tips of fingers and toes. This technique is convenient for surgeons as it allows easy access to hands and feet and the posterior aspects of arms and thighs. It is cost effective and safe as it spares an assistant and decreases the risk of potential occupational injury. Level of Evidence: Level V, therapeutic study.     

Malignant melanoma representing with testicular metastasis: a case report and review of the literature

We present the case of a 52-year-old man, with a history of malignant melanoma, who presented with a testicular lump. Radical orchidectomy confirmed a metastatic malignant melanoma. We discuss salient features of this disease in the light of the published literature.     

Aortic root enlargement in patients undergoing double valve replacement for rheumatic etiology–preliminary results

Introduction  

Combined aortic and mitral valve disease is usually of rheumatic origin. In these patients we often encounter problem of small valve annuli particularly with aortic annulus. It is still debated whether a small prosthesis should be used or aortic root should be enlarged to prevent Patient Prosthesis Mismatch (PPM). This study was undertaken to review our strategy and feasibility of Aortic Root Enlargement (ARE) in patient undergo Double Valve Replacement (DVR) to avoid mismatch without increase in cost of treatment, morbidity or mortality.     

Amiodarone versus sotalol for the treatment of atrial fibrillation after open heart surgery: the Reduction in Postoperative Cardiovascular Arrhythmic Events (REDUCE) trial

Objectives

This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study compared the efficacy and safety of amiodarone and sotalol in the prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF) following open heart surgery.

Background

The incidence of supraventricular arrhythmias following open heart surgery ranges from 20% to 40%, with AF being the most common. Both amiodarone and sotalol have been shown to be effective in reducing postoperative arrhythmias, but no direct comparison of these agents has been conducted.

Methods

A total of 160 patients were randomized, of whom 134 underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) alone, 17 underwent CABG and concomitant aortic valve replacement surgery (AVR), 9 underwent AVR only, and 1 patient's surgery was canceled. Patients with signs or symptoms of congestive heart failure (CHF), ejection fraction ≤30%, estimated creatinine clearance <30 mL/min, or serum creatinine ≥2.5 mg/dL were excluded. Patients were randomized to receive either sotalol 80 mg 2 times per day (n = 76) or intravenous amiodarone 15 mg/kg over 24 hours followed by oral amiodarone 200 mg 3 times per day (n = 83). Study drug was started at the time of surgery and continued for 7 days or until discharge, whichever came first.

Results

AF occurred in 17% of patients randomized to amiodarone and 25% of the patients randomized to sotalol (P = .21). However, the duration of AF was significantly shorter in amiodarone-treated patients (169 ± 224 min) compared to sotalol treated patients (487 ± 505 min; P = .04). In a subgroup analysis, the incidence of AF in patients undergoing AVR or CABG with AVR was significantly less with amiodarone (1/15, 7%) compared to sotalol (9/11, 82%) (P < .001). Blood pressure was lower immediately after surgery with amiodarone but comparable to sotalol at 24 hours. Of the hemodynamic indices measured, only stroke volume was significantly lower in patients randomized to sotalol at 24 hours (P = .035).

Conclusions

Amiodarone and sotalol share similar efficacy and safety in reducing postoperative AF. Hemodynamic effects were similar between both drugs at 24 hours, with the exception that stroke volume was lower in sotalol-treated patients. In patients undergoing more complex surgery, postoperative AF occurred more frequently with sotalol than with amiodarone.