Retroviral infection and selection of culture-derived platelets allows study of the effect of transgenes on platelet physiology ex vivo and on thrombus formation in vivo

Background- We recently reported the development of culture-derived (CD) platelets with the aim to express any protein of interest in these platelets. We now report a specific protocol of retroviral infection into the progenitor cells and subsequent selection, which allows to generate large amounts of highly homogenous transgene-expressing CD platelets and to study transgene function rapidly and reliably at large-scale ex vivo and in vivo settings. METHODS AND RESULTS: After retroviral infection and selection, the activation-dependent expression profile of surface markers, aggregation, and granule release were investigated. The function of transgene-expressing CD platelets, the precursor cells of which had been retrovirally infected, compared well to noninfected CD platelets or freshly isolated platelets. Hence, the retroviral infection protocol did not alter platelet physiology. In contrast, adenoviral infection of precursors to CD platelets resulted in marked functional alterations that obviated their use in analytic experiments. Additionally, sufficient amounts of selected CD platelets were generated to warrant intravenous injections into living mice. This approach permitted study of their adhesive profile at endothelial lesions and their effect on thrombus formation in vivo by intravital videofluorescence microscopy. CONCLUSIONS: The novel selection method allowed us to produce recombinant transgene-expressing platelets in sufficient amounts to study genetically modified platelets in vitro and in vivo.     

From the Cover: Breaking the diffraction limit of light-sheet fluorescence microscopy by RESOLFT

We present a plane-scanning RESOLFT [reversible saturable/switchable optical (fluorescence) transitions] light-sheet (LS) nanoscope, which fundamentally overcomes the diffraction barrier in the axial direction via confinement of the fluorescent molecular state to a sheet of subdiffraction thickness around the focal plane. To this end, reversibly switchable fluorophores located right above and below the focal plane are transferred to a nonfluorescent state at each scanning step. LS-RESOLFT nanoscopy offers wide-field 3D imaging of living biological specimens with low light dose and axial resolution far beyond the diffraction barrier. We demonstrate optical sections that are thinner by 5–12-fold compared with their conventional diffraction-limited LS analogs.Far-field nanoscopy (1, 2) methods discern features within subdiffraction distances by briefly forcing their molecules to two distinguishable states for the time period of detection. Typically, fluorophores are switched between a signaling “on” and a nonsignaling (i.e., dark) “off” state. Depending on the switching and fluorescence registration strategy used, these superresolution techniques can be categorized into coordinate-stochastic and coordinate-targeted approaches (2). The latter group of methods, comprising the so-called RESOLFT [reversible saturable/switchable optical (fluorescence) transitions] (1, 3–7) approaches, have been realized using patterns of switch-off light with one or more zero-intensity points or lines, to single out target point (zero-dimensional) or line (1D) coordinates in space where the fluorophores are allowed to assume the on state. The RESOLFT idea can also be implemented in the inverse mode, by using switch-on light and confining the off state. In any case, probing the presence of molecules in new sets of points or lines at every scanning step produces images.Owing to the nature of the on and off states involved––first excited electronic and ground state––stimulated emission depletion (STED) (3) and saturated structured illumination microscopy (SSIM) (8), which both qualify as variants of the RESOLFT principle, typically apply light intensities in the range of MW/cm² and above. Especially when imaging sensitive samples where photoinduced changes must be avoided, RESOLFT is preferably realized with fluorophores which lead to the same factor of resolution improvement at much lower intensities of state-switching light. Reversibly switchable fluorescent proteins (RSFPs) are highly suitable for this purpose (4–7, 9), as transitions between their metastable on and off states require 5 orders of magnitude lower threshold intensities than STED/SSIM to guarantee switch-off. Suitable spectral properties, relatively fast millisecond switching kinetics, and high photostability of recently developed yellow-green-emitting RSFPs like rsEGFP (5), rsEGFP2 (7), and rsEGFP(N205S) (10) compared with early RSFPs have indeed enabled RESOLFT nanoscopy in living cells and tissues. To date, RSFP-based RESOLFT has achieved resolution improvements by factors of 4–5 in rsEGFP2-labeled samples (7). To further reduce the imaging time, massive parallelization of scanning has been reported (10). However, the diffraction-limited axial resolution and lack of background suppression restrict applications to thin samples.Imaging applications typically require careful tuning of imaging parameters including speed, contrast, photosensitivity, and spatial resolution, depending on the information that is sought. Light-sheet fluorescence microscopy (LSFM) (11–15) stands out by its ability to balance most of these parameters for 3D imaging of living specimens. Recently reenacted as the selective plane illumination microscope (13), this microscopy mode has sparked increasing interest notably because of its short acquisition times in 3D imaging and low phototoxicity in living specimens. It excites fluorophores only in a thin diffraction-limited slice of the sample, perpendicular to the direction of fluorescence detection. The LS is generated by a cylindrical lens which focuses an expanded laser beam in only one direction onto the specimen or into the back-focal plane of an illumination objective. Alternatively, a single beam is quickly moved as a “virtual” LS (16) across a specimen section.In such conventional LSFM imaging, the lateral resolution is determined by the numerical aperture (N.A.) of the detection objective (17), whereas axial resolution is given by the LS thickness, provided the latter is thinner than the axial extent of the point-spread function describing the imaging process from the focal plane of the detecting lens to the camera. In a previous study, the axial resolution of LSFM was pushed to the diffraction limit by using the full aperture of the illumination objective with Gaussian beams; this was carried out for practically useful combinations of N.A. (e.g., 0.8 for both illumination and detection objectives) permissible in light of the geometrical constraints given by the objective lens dimensions (18). High-N.A. illumination comes with short Rayleigh ranges of Gaussian beams, which inherently limit the field of view (FOV) along the direction of illumination. Scanned Bessel beams for diffraction-limited excitation with a virtual LS (19–21) typically offer larger FOVs (22), but side lobes broaden the scanned LS in the axial direction and contribute to phototoxicity outside of the focal plane of detection (20). A more complex approach has used Bessel-beam excitation in combination with structured illumination to obtain near-isotropic (but still diffraction-limited) resolution as measured on fluorescent beads (20), albeit at the cost of acquisition time and reduced contrast due to fluorescence generated by the side lobes. In different work, axial resolution has also been improved about fourfold by acquiring two complementary orthogonal views of the sample using two alternating LSs, followed by computationally fusing image information with a deconvolution incorporating both views (23). LS approaches have also helped suppress out-of-focus background for single-molecule imaging in biological situations (e.g., in ref. 24), including at superresolution (25–27).Slight axial resolution improvement beyond the diffraction barrier has been demonstrated by overlapping a Gaussian excitation LS with a STED LS featuring a zero-intensity plane (28). Due to scattering and possibly additional aberrations caused by the wavelength difference between excitation and STED light, the maximal achievable resolution in biological specimens was severely limited. This was the case even in fixed samples. A successful application of LS-STED to living cells or organisms has not been reported. The relatively high average STED laser power required for high resolution gains calls for developing a coordinate-targeted superresolution LS approach with low-power operation, meaning a concept that does not solely rely on changing the way the light is directed to––or collected from––the sample, but a concept that harnesses an “on–off” transition for improved feature separation.