Can MRI Be Used as a Sole Diagnostic Modality in Determining Clinical Stage in Cervical Cancer?

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to compare staging by MRI to clinical staging in patients with cervical cancer and to determine the histological accuracy of staging by MRI and examination under anesthesia (EUA) in early stage disease.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with cervical cancer between 2010 and 2020 at the Radboud University Medical Centre, the Netherlands. Pretreatment stage (FIGO 2009) by MRI was compared with staging by EUA. Diagnostic accuracy in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive value was calculated for MRI and EUA in patients undergoing surgery (early stage disease) with histological results as a reference standard.ResultsA total of 358 patients were included in the study and MRI-based stage differed from EUA stage in 30.7%. In 12.3% this meant a discrepancy in treatment assignment between MRI and EUA. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI in terms of sensitivity and specificity for detecting early stage disease was comparable to EUA in surgical patients. Further analyses showed that premenopausal status, early stage disease and a tumor diameter of <2 cm were associated with improved comparability of MRI and EUA (98%).ConclusionThere is still a large discrepancy between MRI and EUA. In patients with suspected early stage disease, diagnostic accuracy of MRI is similar to EUA, especially for premenopausal women with early stage disease and a tumor diameter of <2 cm.     

A randomized crossover study comparing light-induced fluorescence endoscopy with standard videoendoscopy for the detection of early neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND: Light-induced fluorescence endoscopy (LIFE) may improve the detection of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and early stage cancer (EC) in Barrett's esophagus (BE). The aim of this study was to compare LIFE with standard endoscopy (SE) in a randomized crossover study. METHODS: Fifty patients with BE underwent SE and LIFE in a randomized sequence (4 to 6-week interval between procedures). The two procedures were performed by two different endoscopists who were blinded to the findings of the other examination. Targeted biopsy specimens were taken from detected lesions, followed by random biopsy specimens with a 2-cm interval, 4-quadrant protocol. Biopsy specimens were routinely evaluated and subsequently reviewed by a single, blinded expert GI pathologist. RESULTS: Targeted biopsy specimens had a sensitivity for the diagnosis of HGD/EC of 62% (8/13) for both techniques. The overall sensitivity (all biopsy specimens) was 85% for SE and 69% for LIFE (p = 0.69). All targeted biopsy specimens had a positive predictive value (PPV) for HGD/EC of 41% for SE and 28% for LIFE (p = 0.40); autofluorescence-targeted biopsy specimens had a PPV of 13%. False-positive lesions had a significantly higher rate of acute inflammation than random biopsy specimens. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, LIFE did not improve the detection of HGD or EC in patients with BE compared with SE.     

Incidence of thrombotic stent occlusion during the first three months after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in 500 consecutive patients

Sirolimus-eluting stents have been used in our institution for all percutaneous interventions, without clinical or anatomic exclusion criteria, as part of the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital registry. We analyzed the incidence of (sub)acute stent thrombosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in an unselected population of 510 consecutive patients. At 3-month follow-up, (sub)acute stent thrombosis was diagnosed in 2 patients (0.4%) 6 hours and 11 days after the procedure, respectively. These cases occurred in diabetic women with complex coronary lesions. Intravascular ultrasound examination showed inadequate stent expansion and uncovered distal dissection as possible mechanical explanations for the thrombosis.     

Patient safety culture in out-of-hours primary care services in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional survey

Objective: To examine patient safety culture in Dutch out-of-hours primary care using the safety attitudes questionnaire (SAQ) which includes five factors: teamwork climate, safety climate, job satisfaction, perceptions of management and communication openness.

Design: Cross-sectional observational study using an anonymous web-survey. Setting Sixteen out-of-hours general practitioner (GP) cooperatives and two call centers in the Netherlands. Subjects Primary healthcare providers in out-of-hours services. Main outcome measures Mean scores on patient safety culture factors; association between patient safety culture and profession, gender, age, and working experience.

Results: Overall response rate was 43%. A total of 784 respondents were included; mainly GPs (N?=?470) and triage nurses (N?=?189). The healthcare providers were most positive about teamwork climate and job satisfaction, and less about communication openness and safety climate. The largest variation between clinics was found on safety climate; the lowest on teamwork climate. Triage nurses scored significantly higher than GPs on each of the five patient safety factors. Older healthcare providers scored significantly higher than younger on safety climate and perceptions of management. More working experience was positively related to higher teamwork climate and communication openness. Gender was not associated with any of the patient safety factors.

Conclusions: Our study showed that healthcare providers perceive patient safety culture in Dutch GP cooperatives positively, but there are differences related to the respondents’ profession, age and working experience. Recommendations for future studies are to examine reasons for these differences, to examine the effects of interventions to improve safety culture and to make international comparisons of safety culture.

• Key Points

• Creating a positive patient safety culture is assumed to be a prerequisite for quality and safety. We found that:

• ??healthcare providers in Dutch GP cooperatives perceive patient safety culture positively;

• ??triage nurses scored higher than GPs, and older and more experienced healthcare professionals scored higher than younger and less experienced professionals – on several patient safety culture factors; and

• ??within the GP cooperatives, safety climate and openness of communication had the largest potential for improvement.

     

Integrating mental health care into residential homes for the elderly: an analysis of six Dutch programs for older people with severe and persistent mental illness

Integrating mental health care into residential homes for the elderly is a potentially effective model to address the complex care needs of older chronically mentally ill people. Because no research was available on the implementation of such integrated care in practice, six programs already operating in the Netherlands were analyzed. At the administrative level, three types of cooperative arrangements existed: a psychiatric hospital renting a unit in a residential home for the elderly, a psychiatric hospital stationing mental health professionals in a residential home on a permanent basis, and a residential home employing its own psychiatrically trained staff. At the operational level, contrasting views emerged on the relation-ship between physical and mental health care; these were delivered separately or in integrated form. In either case, the employees trained as elder care workers or as psychiatric nurses had difficulties understanding each other because they held different ideas about good-quality care. These care visions can be characterized as the care-giving approach (care workers) versus the problem-oriented and the rehabilitation approaches (nurses). At the housing level, two models existed: mentally ill patients having apartments in a separate unit (concentrated housing) or located throughout the facility (dispersed housing). The most promising model appears to be the one in which a psychiatric hospital assigns mental health professionals to work in a residential home, where they remain administratively and operationally distinct from the standard residential services. Whether or not the psychiatric residents should be housed in separate units could not be decided based on this study.     

Safety of rush immunotherapy using a modified schedule: a cumulative experience of 893 patients receiving multiple aeroallergens.

Conventional immunotherapy (IT) is effective in treating allergic rhinitis, allergic asthma, and chronic rhinosinusitis. Disadvantages include poor compliance, delayed efficacy, and patient frustration. Rush IT, or rapid desensitization, offers the advantages of rapid response, improved compliance, and cost-effectiveness. Although premedication with corticosteroids and antihistamines dramatically reduces systemic reactions, safety remains a primary concern. Two separate half-day schedules with minor differences were used to rapidly desensitize 893 patients (aged 1.5-77 years) in two typical outpatient settings equipped to treat anaphylaxis. All patients exhibited positive skin-prick tests to perennial and seasonal allergens. Diagnoses included allergic rhinitis (857/96%), allergic asthma (505/57%), and chronic rhinosinusitis (384/43%). Five hundred sixty-eight patients were premedicated with prednisone and HI-antihistamine for 3 days. Three hundred twenty-five patients were premedicated for 3 days with prednisone and H1- and H2-blockade. The protocol's final dose ranged from 0.1 to 0.5 mL of a 1:1000 dilution of extracts manufactured by ALK and Greer Laboratories. Patients continued on to higher doses by resuming a conventional schedule. Eighteen patients (2.0%) experienced a mild systemic reaction. All responded to subcutaneous epinephrine and/or nebulized albuterol and were sent home after observation. One patient (0.1%) experienced true anaphylaxis and received appropriate treatment and observation. Our experience with rush IT confirms that maintenance IT can be reached quickly and safely under careful supervision. Caution must be exercised when using this procedure because anaphylaxis does occur. Systemic reactions occur less frequently using a lower targeted final dose than previously described in the literature.     

Simple dipstick assay for the detection of Salmonella typhi-specific IgM antibodies and the evolution of the immune response in patients with typhoid fever

Application of a dipstick assay for the detection of Salmonella typhi-specific IgM antibodies on samples collected from S. typhi or S. paratyphi culture-positive patients at the day of admission to the hospital revealed the presence of specific IgM antibodies in 43.5%, 92.9%, and 100% for samples collected 4-6 days, 6-9 days, and > 9 days after the onset of fever, respectively. The mean sensitivity for samples collected an average of 6.6 days after the onset of fever was 65.3%. Culture was positive in 65.9% of the cases with a final clinical diagnosis of typhoid fever. Testing of paired serum samples from culture negative patients with a final clinical diagnosis of typhoid fever resulted in staining of the dipstick in 4.3% of the samples collected at the day of admission to the hospital and in 76.6% of the samples collected one week later, thereby provided strong supporting evidence of typhoid fever by demonstrating seroconversion in a large proportion of the patients. The dipstick assay may thus also be useful for the serodiagnosis of culture-negative patients with clinical signs and symptoms consistent with typhoid fever. The advantages of the dipstick assay are that the result can be obtained on the same day allowing a prompt treatment, that only a small volume of serum is needed, and that no special laboratory equipment is needed to perform the assay. The stability of the reagents of the dipstick and the simplicity of the assay allows its use in places that lack laboratory facilities.