Stimulation of tyrosine phosphorylation after ligation of beta7 and beta1 integrins on human B cells

B lymphocytes express several members of the integrin family of adhesion molecules that mediate cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix interactions. In addition to beta1 integrins, predominantly alpha4 beta1, mature B cells also express alpha4 beta7, which is a receptor for vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and fibronectin, and is also involved in the homing of B cells to mucosal sites through binding to a third ligand, mucosal address in cell adhesion molecule-1. Here we describe that crosslinking of alpha4 beta7 integrins on B cell lines and normal tonsillar B cells, induces tyrosine phosphorylation of multiple substrates of 105-130 kD, indicating that beta7 integrin plays a role as signaling molecule in B cells. This pattern of phosphorylated proteins was very similar to that induced following ligation of alpha4 beta1. Interestingly, ligation of alpha5 beta1 or alpha6 beta1 also stimulated the 105-125 kD group of phosphorylated proteins, whereas ligation of beta2 integrins did not. The focal adhesion tyrosine kinase p125FAK was identified as one of these substrates. Beta1 or beta7 mediated tyrosine phosphorylations were markedly decreased when the microfilament assembly was inhibited by cytochalasin B. These results suggest that intracellular signals initiated by different integrins in B cells may converge, to similar cytoskeleton-dependent tyrosine phosphorylated proteins.     

Enhanced leukocyte binding by intestinal microvascular endothelial cells in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Microvascular endothelial cells mediate leukocyte homing, angiogenesis, and inflammation and healing and show tissue- specific adhesion molecules and functions. The activation of human intestinal mucosal microvascular endothelial cells (HIMECs) was studied in vitro to uncover possible abnormalities associated with inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS: HIMECs were isolated from normal and inflammatory bowel disease mucosa and assessed for phenotypic and morphological features, proliferative response, leukocyte binding capacity, and adhesion molecule expression. RESULTS: Basal proliferation by HIMECs was less than that of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) but increased proportionally more in response to vascular endothelial growth factor. Proinflammatory stimuli induced an activated, spindle-shaped morphology in HIMEC monolayers. Compared with HUVECs, unstimulated HIMECs showed less adhesiveness for U937 and MOLT4 cells and neutrophils, but cytokines and lipopolysaccharide substantially increased the binding capacity of HIMECs. HIMECs derived from inflammatory bowel disease mucosa showed a markedly greater leukocyte-binding capacity than normal mucosal HIMECs. Patterns of intercellular adhesion molecule 1, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 and E-selectin messenger RNA expression were distinct in HIMECs, HUVECs, and mucosal mesenchymal cells. CONCLUSIONS: HIMECs represent differentiated endothelial cells with unique functional properties. Their dramatically enhanced capacity to bind leukocytes in inflammatory bowel disease suggests that HIMECs play an important role in initiating or maintaining inflammation. (Gastroenterology 1997 Jun;112(6):1895-907)     

Foretinib is a potent inhibitor of oncogenic ROS1 fusion proteins

The rapidly growing recognition of the role of oncogenic ROS1 fusion proteins in the malignant transformation of multiple cancers, including lung adenocarcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and glioblastoma, is driving efforts to develop effective ROS1 inhibitors for use as molecularly targeted therapy. Using a multidisciplinary approach involving small molecule screening in combination with in vitro and in vivo tumor models, we show that foretinib (GSK1363089) is a more potent ROS1 inhibitor than crizotinib (PF-02341066), an ALK/ROS inhibitor currently in clinical evaluation for lung cancer patients harboring ROS1 rearrangements. Whereas crizotinib has demonstrated promising early results in patients with ROS1-rearranged non–small-cell lung carcinoma, recently emerging clinical evidence suggests that patients may develop crizotinib resistance due to acquired point mutations in the kinase domain of ROS1, thus necessitating identification of additional potent ROS1 inhibitors for therapeutic intervention. We confirm that the ROS1^G2032R mutant, recently reported in clinical resistance to crizotinib, retains foretinib sensitivity at concentrations below safe, clinically achievable levels. Furthermore, we use an accelerated mutagenesis screen to preemptively identify mutations in the ROS1 kinase domain that confer resistance to crizotinib and demonstrate that these mutants also remain foretinib sensitive. Taken together, our data strongly suggest that foretinib is a highly effective ROS1 inhibitor, and further clinical investigation to evaluate its potential therapeutic benefit for patients with ROS1-driven malignancies is warranted.Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) are critical mediators of extracellular signals that control key cell growth, survival, and motility pathways. Conversely, deregulated and constitutive RTK activation is responsible for the initiation and progression of many cancers. Multiple mechanisms contribute to aberrant RTK activation including chromosomal rearrangements, point mutations, and gene amplification. Oncogenic activation of the orphan RTK c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) is observed in a subset of patients with glioblastoma, non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and cholangiocarcinoma (1–5). In most cases, ROS1 signaling is activated by interchromosomal translocation or intrachromosomal deletion that results in N-terminal ROS1 fusion genes. Several ROS1 kinase fusion proteins have been identified, including the Fused in Glioblastoma–ROS1 (FIG–ROS) that was first discovered in a human glioblastoma cell line (2) and more recently in patients with NSCLC (4), cholangiocarcinoma (3), and serous ovarian carcinoma (6). The SLC34A2–ROS1 (SLC–ROS) fusion is present in a subset of patients with NSCLC (1, 7) and gastric cancer (8). Other ROS1 fusions include CD74–ROS1, EZR–ROS1, LRIG3–ROS1, SDC4–ROS1, and TPM3–ROS1 (5).Given the recent success of molecularly targeted therapies in treating cancers driven by oncogenic kinases, there is acute clinical momentum to identify inhibitors that selectively target ROS1 fusions. Because the ROS1 and Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) domains are partially homologous, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved ALK/MET kinase inhibitor crizotinib is being investigated via phase I/II clinical trials for its efficacy in ROS1-driven lung cancer patients (9). Although early results appear promising, consistent with the clinical experience of crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive lung cancer to date, as well as prior experience with kinase inhibitors in many other malignancies (10–13), recent evidence suggests that a subset of patients with crizotinib-treated ROS1 fusion-positive may acquire ROS1 kinase domain mutations that confer drug resistance, thus necessitating alternative therapeutic approaches.To identify additional and potentially more efficacious ROS1 inhibitors, we used an unbiased, high-throughput kinase inhibitor screening assay and discovered that foretinib (GSK1363089) and Gö6976 are potent inhibitors of ROS1. Foretinib selectively suppresses the growth of the SLC–ROS-driven human NSCLC cell line HCC78 and of FIG–ROS-driven murine cholangiocarcinoma, but not of EGFR-driven NSCLC or phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN)-suppressed murine cholangiocarcinoma cells. Further, treatment of tumor-bearing mice with foretinib resulted in specific and dramatic regression of FIG–ROS-driven tumors in contrast to non-FIG–ROS tumors that share similar histopathological features. Importantly, we also use a cell-based in vitro resistance screen to preemptively identify several ROS1 kinase domain point mutations that confer resistance to crizotinib and show that these crizotinib-resistant ROS1 mutants remain sensitive to foretinib. These data suggest that foretinib may provide an alternative front-line treatment for ROS1-positive tumors and an effective second-line approach for patients that develop crizotinib-resistant disease.     

Cystic fibrosis and the phenotypic expression of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease

Recent experiments in cultured cyst epithelial cells from kidneys of patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) have shown that the cystic fibrosis (CF) transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) is present in the apical surface of these cells and mediates chloride (Cl-) and fluid secretion in vitro. To determine whether the presence of CF with the expression of mutated CFTR proteins modifies cyst formation in ADPKD, we studied a large family with both inherited diseases. ADPKD in this family is linked to PKD1. The family is composed of 26 members; 11 members with ADPKD, 4 members with CF, and 2 members with both diseases. Renal volumes measured by computerized tomography (CT), calculated creatinine clearances, and other clinical parameters in the family members with ADPKD and CF were compared with those in the family members with ADPKD alone, as well as to a large population of patients with ADPKD. The patients with CF and ADPKD, but not the CF heterozygote carriers with ADPKD, had less severe polycystic kidney and liver disease, as indicated by normal renal function; smaller renal volume, even when corrected for height and body surface area; and the absence of hypertension and liver cysts. These observations suggest that the coexistence of CF may reduce the severity of ADPKD.     

Risk factors for development of dehydration in children aged under five who have acute watery diarrhoea: a case-control study

Objective: To identify risk factors for development of dehydration in under five year olds with acute watery diarrhoea.Design: Hospital based unmatched case-control study.Setting: Diarrhoea Treatment Unit, Government Medical College Hospital, Nagpur, India.Participants: The study included 387 cases of diarrhoea having severe or moderate dehydration and 387 controls suffering from diarrhoea with mild or no dehydration.Risk factors: The study included infancy, female sex, religion, residing in urban slums or rural area, under nutrition, cessation of breast feeding during diarrhoeal episode, fluid intake decreased/stopped during diarrhoea, ORS not received, home available fluids (HAF) not received, both ORS and HAF not received, non-washing of hands by mother before preparation of food, after defaecation, after disposal of faeces, history of measles in the previous six months, frequency of stools >8/d, frequency of vomiting more than twice per day and temperature more than 99°F, as risk factors for development of dehydration.Statistical analysis: Univariate analysis included OR, 95% CI for OR and Chi-square test. Multivariate analysis was carried out by unconditional multiple logistic regression (MLR).Results: This study identified the significance of infancy, religion, severe undernutrition, non-washing of hands by mother before preparation of food, frequency of stool >8/d, frequency of vomiting >2/d, history of measles in previous six months, withdrawal of breast feeding during diarrhoea, withdrawal of fluids during diarrhoea and not giving ORS, HAF or both during diarrhoea, in the outcome of development of moderate or severe dehydration.Conclusions: Timely intervention in the preventable risk factors included in this study may prevent the development of moderate or severe dehydration in the children suffering form acute watery diarrhoea.