Is shared decision-making vanishing at the end-of-life? A descriptive and qualitative study of advanced cancer patients’ involvement in specific therapies decision-making

Background

Little is known about what is at stake at a subjective level for the oncologists and the advanced cancer patients when they face the question whether to continue, limit or stop specific therapies. We studied (1) the frequency of such questioning, and (2) subjective determinants of the decision-making process from the physicians’ and the patients’ perspectives.

Methods

(1) All hospitalized patients were screened during 1 week in oncology and/or hematology units of five institutions. We included those with advanced cancer for whom a questioning about the pursuit, the limitation or the withholding of specific therapies (QST) was raised. (2) Qualitative design was based on in-depth interviews.

Results

In conventional units, 12.8 % of cancer patients (26 out of 202) were concerned by a QST during the study period. Interviews were conducted with all physicians and 21 advanced cancer patients. The timing of this questioning occurred most frequently as physicians estimated life expectancy between 15 days and 3 months. Faced with the most frequent dilemma (uncertain risk-benefit balance), physicians showed different ways of involving patients. The first two were called the “no choice” models: 1) trying to resolve the dilemma via a technical answer or a “wait-and-see” posture, instead of involving the patients in the questioning and the thinking; and 2), giving a “last minute” choice to the patients, leaving to them the responsibility of the decision. In a third model, they engaged early in shared reflections and dialogue about uncertainties and limits with patients, proxies and care teams. These schematic trends influenced patients’ attitudes towards uncertainty and limits, as they were influenced by these ones. Individual and systemic barriers to a shared questioning were pointed out by physicians and patients.

Conclusions

This study indicate to what extent these difficult decisions are related to physicians’ and patients’ respective and mutually influenced abilities to deal with and share about uncertainties and limits, throughout the disease trajectory. These insights may help physicians, patients and policy makers to enrich their understanding of underestimated and sensitive key issues of the decision-making process.

     

Inter- and Intra-Subject Variability of Neuromagnetic Resting State Networks

Functional connectivity studies conducted at the group level using magnetoencephalography (MEG) suggest that resting state networks (RSNs) emerge from the large-scale envelope correlation structure within spontaneous oscillatory brain activity. However, little is known about the consistency of MEG RSNs at the individual level. This paper investigates the inter- and intra-subject variability of three MEG RSNs (sensorimotor, auditory and visual) using seed-based source space envelope correlation analysis applied to 5 min of resting state MEG data acquired from a 306-channel whole-scalp neuromagnetometer (Elekta Oy, Helsinki, Finland) and source projected with minimum norm estimation. The main finding is that these three MEG RSNs exhibit substantial variability at the single-subject level across and within individuals, which depends on the RSN type, but can be reduced after averaging over subjects or sessions. Over- and under-estimations of true RSNs variability are respectively obtained using template seeds, which are potentially mislocated due to inter-subject variations, and a seed optimization method minimizing variability. In particular, bounds on the minimal number of subjects or sessions required to obtain highly consistent between- or within-subject averages of MEG RSNs are derived. Furthermore, MEG RSN topography positively correlates with their mean connectivity at the inter-subject level. These results indicate that MEG RSNs associated with primary cortices can be robustly extracted from seed-based envelope correlation and adequate averaging. MEG thus appears to be a valid technique to compare RSNs across subjects or conditions, at least when using the current methods.     

Design of donecopride,a dual serotonin subtype 4 receptor agonist/acetylcholinesterase inhibitor with potential interest for Alzheimer's disease treatment

RS67333 is a partial serotonin subtype 4 receptor (5-HT₄R) agonist that has been widely studied for its procognitive effect. More recently, it has been shown that its ability to promote the nonamyloidogenic cleavage of the precursor of the neurotoxic amyloid-β peptide leads to the secretion of the neurotrophic protein sAPPα. This effect has generated great interest in RS67333 as a potential treatment for Alzheimer’s disease (AD). We show herein that RS67333 is also a submicromolar acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor and therefore, could contribute, through this effect, to the restoration of the cholinergic neurotransmission that becomes altered in AD. We planned to pharmacomodulate RS67333 to enhance its AChE inhibitory activity to take advantage of this pleiotropic pharmacological profile in the design of a novel multitarget-directed ligand that is able to exert not only a symptomatic but also, a disease-modifying effect against AD. These efforts allowed us to select donecopride as a valuable dual (h)5-HT₄R partial agonist (K_i = 10.4 nM; 48.3% of control agonist response)/(h)AChEI (IC₅₀ = 16 nM) that further promotes sAPPα release (EC₅₀ = 11.3 nM). Donecopride, as a druggable lead, was assessed for its in vivo procognitive effects (0.1, 0.3, 1, and 3 mg/kg) with an improvement of memory performances observed at 0.3 and 1 mg/kg on the object recognition test. On the basis of these in vitro and in vivo activities, donecopride seems to be a promising drug candidate for AD treatment.Among the large family of serotonin receptors (5-HTR), some of them, such as the subtype 4 (5-HT₄R), are of particular interest in improving memory performance and therefore, decreasing memory deficits, such as those that occur in Alzheimer''s disease (AD). In the CNS, they are located in structures that are primarily involved in cognitive functions, like the olfactory tubercles, basal ganglia, septum, substantia nigra, superior colliculi, hippocampus, and cortex. Several compounds act as agonists to 5-HT₄R (BIMU1, BIMU8, RS17017, SL65.0155, VRX-03011, prucalopride, RS67333, and RS67506). One of the most affine (pK_i = 7.88) and selective vs. other receptors is RS67333, which acts as a partial agonist (1). With respect to the potential therapeutic modulation of 5-HT₄R with RS67333 and excluding its putative antidepressant-like activity (2–4), most studies focused on the promnesic or antiamnesic actions of this compound. These effects on cognitive functions that concern learning and memory are probably, in part, because of the fact that the pharmacological stimulation of these receptors increases the release of ACh in the hippocampus and cortex, and it also increases serotonin, dopamine, and GABA release (5–13). Concerning the selective aspects of memory functions, RS67333 has been shown to improve object recognition in adult (14, 15) and aged animals (16, 17) and place recognition (10) in rodents. It also increases spatial learning on the Morris water maze task in rodents, and it even reverses the deleterious effect of atropine (18) or scopolamine during this same task.Based on the structural analogy existing between RS67333 and donepezil (Fig. 1), we postulated that RS67333 could improve learning and memory by not only activating 5-HT₄R but also, inhibiting acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity. Indeed, several early studies reported that the inhibition of AChE improved cognition and that this effect is the main reason for the initial use of donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine as cognitive enhancers in AD (19, 20). AChE inhibition has also been reported to improve performances in healthy rodents or animal models of memory deficiency (21). The hypothesis of an involvement of AChE inhibition by RS67333 in memory improvement is an issue that has never been tested.Open in a separate windowFig. 1.RS67333 and donepezil are chemically close.Furthermore, such a pharmacological profile could be also exploited to lead to pleiotropic compounds that are theoretically useful in AD treatment. Indeed, today, it is well-established that 5-HT₄R activation not only favors ACh release but also, is involved in the nonamyloidogenic cleavage of amyloid precursor protein (APP) in the neurotrophic sAPPα fragment, with secretion that is detrimental to amyloid-β peptide (Aβ) production (22–24). However, inhibiting the catalytic activity of AChE is widely used to restore cholinergic neurotransmission in AD, and interacting with the peripheral anionic site (PAS) of this enzyme could also reduce amyloid aggregation, for which AChE would be responsible (25). These activities seem to be synergistic when they are associated in an AD animal model, which we have recently shown in mice (26). A second pharmacological approach based on the fact that a single compound may be able to hit multiple targets is now emerging. This concept, called multitarget-directed ligands (MTDLs) (27, 28), would have inherent advantages over a combination of drugs called multiple medication therapy. It would specially obviate the problems linked to the complexity of the pharmacokinetic profile of the combined drugs and the risk of drug–drug interactions. Moreover, MTDL could also alleviate compliance difficulties associated with multiple medication therapy. It has also been shown that MTDLs generally show a higher synergistic effect than that observed with a combination of drugs. Numerous examples of MTDL against AD have been recently described (27). Most of them associate an AChE inhibitory effect with another activity hitting another molecular target of AD, such as antioxidant effect, monoamine oxidase inhibition, calcium channel blocking effect, metal chelating activity, etc. However, no MTDLs associating an inhibition of AChE and 5-HT₄R agonist effect have been hitherto described. Among the different ways to synthesize such MTDLs, one of them is to merge the frameworks of two selective starting compounds, each one exerting an activity toward a sole target (28). This goal is even more easily reached if the starting compounds are structurally close, and it is the reason why we considered the structural analogy between donepezil and RS67333 as a good starting point to design MTDLs displaying both activities (AChE inhibition and 5-HT₄R agonist activities). We will, thus, provide proof of this concept with the synthesis and biological evaluation of MR31147 (donecopride) as conceived from the pharmacomodulation of RS67333.