BUILDING COMMUNITY: Developing Skills for Interprofessional Health Professions Education and Relationship-Centered Care

In 1995, the National League for Nursing commissioned a Panel on Interdisciplinary/Transdisciplinary Education. The focus of the Panel's work was to examine educational issues that transcend the health professions and to make recommendations for future implementation of an interdisciplinary approach to addressing them. This article is being simultaneously published by several professional journals. The goal is to seek as much feedback as possible.     

Hair Loss after Rhytidectomy

BACKGROUND: Temporal hair loss has been reported to occur in up to 8.4% of patients after rhytidectomy. To date, no one has described the associated histopathologic findings. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to illustrate the microscopic findings seen in the affected area of hair loss after rhytidectomy. METHODS: Two punch biopsies from the temporal area were performed, and pathologic material was submitted. RESULTS: Histopathologic finding was suggestive of acute localized telogen effluvium. CONCLUSION: One mechanism for temporal hair loss after rhytidectomy is an acute localized telogen effluvium.     

Canadian Association of General Surgeons Evidence Based Reviews in Surgery. 10. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomized trial.

Question: Is there a difference in cancer-related survival between laparoscopic assisted colectomy (LAC) and open colectomy (OC)? Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Single-centre trial, Barcelona, Spain. Patients: Two hundred and nineteen of 442 eligible patients with adenocarcinoma of the colon were included. Patients were excluded if the tumour was below 15 cm from the anal verge or was in the transverse colon; if there were distant metastases, adjacent organ involvement or obstruction; or the patient had previous colonic surgery. One hundred and eleven were randomized to the LAC group and 108 to the OC. Interventions: Randomization was done the day before surgery. Patients were stratified into 2 groups according to tumour location (right or left side with respect to the splenic flexure) and assigned to the LAC or OC group by means of sealed opaque envelopes containing computer-generated random numbers. Patients in both groups had surgery by a single gastrointestinal surgical team. Pre- and postoperative care was standardized for bowel prep and perioperative antibiotics. Patients received either LAC or OC using a no-touch technique and initial vascular ligation. Main outcome measure: Overall survival. Results: The Cox model showed that LAC was independently associated with reduced risk of tumour relapse (hazard ratio 0.39, 95% CI 0.19 – 0.82), death from any cause (0.48, 0.23 –1.01) and death from a cancer-related cause (0.38, 0.16– 0.91) compared with OC. This superiority of LAC was due to differences in patients with stage III tumours (freedom from recurrence p = 0.04, overall survival p = 0.02, and cancer- related survival p = 0.006). Conclusion: LAC is more effective than OC for treatment in terms of morbidity, hospital stay, tumour recurrence and cancer-related survival.     

Cognitive estimation in traumatic brain injury.

The present study explores the construct and ecological validity of the Biber Cognitive Estimation Test (BCET) in a traumatic brain injury (TBI) sample. Participants completed the BCET in the course of a neuropsychological evaluation at 1-15 years after injury. BCET scores correlated moderately with other standard measures of executive functioning, and contrary to our hypotheses, at least as high with neuropsychological tests with minimal demands on executive functioning. Moreover, partialing out the portion of BCET variance not attributable to executive functioning markedly attenuated the former correlations. With respect to ecological validity, BCET scores did not predict concurrent functional status, as measured by the Disability Rating Scale. By comparison, standard measures of executive functioning strongly correlated with each other, correlated less strongly with nonexecutive functioning measures, and predicted functional status. In conclusion, unlike standard measures of executive functioning, the BCET demonstrated poor construct and ecological validity in TBI patients.