Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms without skin rash

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) or drug hypersensitivity syndrome is considered as a severe cutaneous adverse drug reaction which is most commonly precipitated by aromatic anticonvulsants, lamotrigine, dapsone, allopurinol, minocycline, and salazopyrin. Its clinical manifestations are often variable. On rare occasions, it can present with only systemic involvement without any cutaneous features. A complete drug history is of paramount importance in making an early diagnosis. We report the case of a male patient who presented with fever, lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, and hepatitis, 2 weeks after starting salazopyrin. The presence of atypical lymphocytes in the peripheral smear was indicative of a viral infection or a hematological dyscrasia. Bone marrow examination revealed a normocellular marrow with an increase in eosinophil precursors. Investigations for the common causes for fever and hepatitis were negative. The presence of eosinophilia, the temporal relationship of the symptoms with the initiation of treatment with salazopyrin, and the marked improvement on withdrawal of the drug along with the administration of systemic corticosteroids, were features consistent with the diagnosis of DRESS. With the incidence of this condition showing a rising trend, it is important for the clinician to be aware of its variable manifestations, as a delay in diagnosis and treatment can be fatal.KEY WORDS: Absence of skin lesions, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, salazopyrin     

Lesion-Specific and Vessel-Related Determinants of Fractional Flow Reserve Beyond Coronary Artery Stenosis

Objectives

The aims of the present study were: 1) to investigate the contribution of the extent of luminal stenosis and other lesion composition-related factors in predicting invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR); and 2) to explore the distribution of various combinations of morphological characteristics and the severity of stenosis among lesions demonstrating normal and abnormal FFR.

Predictors of angiographic restenosis after coronary intervention in patients with diabetes mellitus

Background

Patients with diabetes mellitus are particularly prone to restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention. An exploratory, nested, case-control study was undertaken to identify clinical, lesional, and procedural predictors of angiographic restenosis in these patients.

Methods

Seventy-five patients with diabetes mellitus with 86 coronary lesions were selected from a larger population of 217 patients who had undergone 6-month angiographic follow-up after a first, successful balloon angioplasty (PTCA) or stent implantation procedure. Data collection was by patient interview and review of hospital database and other medical records. All angiograms were analyzed with quantitative coronary angiography, and restenosis was defined as a ≥50% diameter reduction at the treated site. A multivariate analysis of 10 prespecified explanatory variables, derived from a literature review, was performed on a per-lesion basis.

Results

There were 45 patients (53 lesions) with restenosis and 30 patients (33 lesions) without restenosis. Univariate predictors of binary restenosis were periprocedural glycosylated hemoglobin level, vessel reference diameter, PTCA, and larger final balloon size to reference artery diameter ratio. Multiple logistic regression identified poor glycemic control (odds ratio [OR] 3.03, 95% CI 1.06-8.65, P = .038), small vessel reference diameter (OR 3.41, 95% CI 1.17-9.95, P = .025), and mode of intervention (OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.08-9.00, P = .036) as independent risk factors. Vessel reference diameter appeared to be an important effect modifier of the association between type of intervention and angiographic outcome, with stenting no longer superior to PTCA in patients with diabetes mellitus who had vessels <2.87 mm in diameter (P = .054).

Conclusion

Poor glycemic control, vessel size, and PTCA were independent predictors of restenosis in patients with diabetes mellitus. It is possible that improved periprocedural glycemic control, in addition to stenting, may reduce the restenosis rate in these patients.