Bullet and Blast ENT Injuries in Counter-Insurgency Area

Background

Many ENT injuries are not recognized easily, but they have the potential of increasing the morbidity.

Methods

ENT injuries managed in two tertiary care Level-IV hospitals between 2006 and 2007 were studied with a view to formulate strategy in efficient management of these cases.

Result

Emergency bags did not carry readymade packs to control nasal bleeds. Routinely screening of ears in all blast injury cases in the ‘Blast Injury Program’ helped in early identification of hearing loss. Lack of sufficient stenting of nasal cavities resulted in severe nasal stenosis which was difficult to repair. Splinters lodged in pharyngeal wall escaped detection, resulting in concealed haemorrhage and shock.

Conclusion

Nasal packs and epistaxis catheters must be included in emergency bags to minimize blood loss at first contact. Screening for ear trauma in all blast injuries increases detection rate and is beneficial to the soldier. Stenting of injured nasal cavities and early transfer to a tertiary care hospital could reduce morbidity. Plain radiography of head and neck areas could help detect splinters in vital areas and guide management.Key Words: Combat injuries ENT, Blast injuries ear     

Impact of Endoscopic Sinus Surgery on Symptom Manifestation of Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Background

Rhinosinusitis is a significant health problem which results in large financial burden on society. The study evaluated the prevalence and severity of individual symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and the impact of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) on the symptoms and medication used in patients with CRS.

Methods

Patients with refractory CRS were assessed prospectively with ESS intervention. We studied the symptoms, change in medical therapy, complications of surgery and effect of other factors like smoking, polyposis and asthma on endoscopy and computed tomography scan scores.

Result

A total of 81 patients underwent ESS for CRS. Post nasal drip (95%), headache (91%), nasal discharge (90%) and nasal obstruction (86%) were the commonest symptoms. Postoperatively, the highest improvement was seen in nasal blockage (87.2%), postnasal drip (84.4%) and headache (82.4%). Endoscopy scores were significantly worse in patients with polyps, asthma and smoking. A significant reduction in use of antibiotic and antihistaminics was seen post surgery. Seven patients who had extensive polyposis preoperatively, had recurrence and required revision surgery. Nasal synechiae formation and mild bleeding were the minor complications.

Conclusion

Endoscopic sinus surgery results in significant improvement in the symptoms of patients with CRS alongwith a definitive decrease in antibiotic and antihistaminic requirement. We conclude that ESS is an effective treatment for CRS in those who fail to respond to medical treatment.Key Words: Chronic rhinosinusitis, Endoscopic sinus surgery