Experience with the Amplatz retrievable vena caval filter. Work in progress

The Amplatz retrievable vena caval filter was designed in an attempt to decrease complications associated with the placement of Mobin-Uddin or Kimray-Greenfield filters. The design allows percutaneous retrieval, thus expanding application of the filter to situations requiring temporary prophylaxis against pulmonary embolism. Filters have been placed in 16 patients, nine (56%) for prophylactic purposes. All filters were easily inserted percutaneously. Complications occurred in three patients; these included complete thrombosis of the inferior vena cava below the filter, misplacement of one filter into the pericaval retroperitoneal tissue, and development of thrombus cranial to the filter. With the current introduction system, the possibility of filter misplacement has been essentially eliminated. No patient experienced symptoms suggestive of pulmonary embolism after filter insertion. One filter retrieval has been performed, with no complications.     

Effect of medial arch-heel support in inserts on reducing ankle eversion: a biomechanics study

Background  

Excessive pronation (or eversion) at ankle joint in heel-toe running correlated with lower extremity overuse injuries. Orthotics and inserts are often prescribed to limit the pronation range to tackle the problem. Previous studies revealed that the effect is product-specific. This study investigated the effect of medial arch-heel support in inserts on reducing ankle eversion in standing, walking and running.     

EFFICACY OF RAMIPRIL VERSUS ENALAPRIL IN PATIENTS WITH MILD TO MODERATE ESSENTIAL HYPERTENSION

SUMMARY This double-blind, randomised, cross-over study investigated the antihypertensive efficacy of ramipril and enalapril was completed by 30 patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. After a four-week placebo run-in phase, the patients received either 2.5mg ramipril or 10mg enalapril once daily for four weeks. The dosages were increased to 5mg ramipril and 20mg enalapril for a further four weeks. After a placebo washout phase of four weeks, the patients were crossed over to the alternative treatment. The decrease in average 24-hour ambulatory diastolic blood pressure from week 0 to week 8 was 1.6mmHg greater with ramipril than enalapril (90% confidence interval 0.6-2.7mmHg). The corresponding reduction in for systolic blood pressure was also greater with ramipril than enalapril by 2.4mmHg (90% confidence interval: 0.5-4.2mmHg). For the difference in the drop of 24-hour ambulatory diastolic blood pressure between ramipril and enalapril the lower level of the 90% confidence interval (CI) is above the clinically relevant difference of -3mmHg. This is an indication that ramipril (2.5 and 5mg dose) is at least as effective as enalapril (10 and 20mg dose) in decreasing blood pressure in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. The duration of adequate antihypertensive effect was relatively long for both ramipril and enalapril; however, ramipril tended to have a more prolonged antihypertensive effect. Ramipril had a higher diastolic and systolic trough/peak ratio than enalapril, resulting in a more uniform antihypertensive effect over the 24-hour treatment period. Both ramipril and enalapril were well tolerated and the two treatment groups had similar safety profiles.     

基于7次跨膜受体的药物发现基本方法——细胞检测

随着检测技术进步,含7个跨膜α螺旋结构的受体性质已渐为人们所了解。7次跨膜（7TM）受体不仅具有开关功能,更类似于信息微处理器;特定配体只能参与特定受体介导的部分信号机制,这就为药物发现开拓了一个新领域。为进一步发现7TM受体与配体间的新行为并量化评价药物对这一复杂系统的作用效能,进而指导药物化学研究,药理学检测已成为关注焦点。本文阐述从还原重组体到整体系统测定方法的回归,讨论药物效价与评价其效应的特定检测方法间的联系,强调新的检测方法在药物发现过程中的价值。     

Comparison of the safety and immunogenicity of ACAM1000, ACAM2000 and Dryvax in healthy vaccinia-naive adults

Currently, more than half of the world's population has no immunity against smallpox variola major virus. This phase I double-blind, randomized trial was conducted to compare the safety and immunogenicity of two clonally derived, cell-culture manufactured vaccinia strains, ACAM1000 and ACAM2000, to the parent vaccine, Dryvax^®. Thirty vaccinia-naïve subjects were enrolled into each of three groups and vaccines were administered percutaneously using a bifurcated needle at a dose of 1.0 × 10⁸ PFU/mL. All subjects had a primary skin reaction indicating a successful vaccination. The adverse events, 4-fold neutralizing antibody rise and T cell immune responses were similar between the groups.     

Immunization of rhesus monkeys with a mucosal prime, parenteral boost strategy protects against infection with Helicobacter pylori

Rhesus monkeys were immunized with recombinant Helicobacter pylori urease vaccine given solely by the parenteral route or preceded by a priming dose given by the oral route. Two groups of monkeys received parenteral urease with either a synthetic glycolipid adjuvant (Bay) or aluminum hydroxide (alum) as adjuvants. A third group of monkeys received a priming dose of oral urease given with the mucosal adjuvant LT (Escherichia coli heat labile enterotoxin), followed by parenterally administered booster doses of urease adsorbed to alum. Monkeys receiving placebo served as controls. The monkeys received a total of 4 doses of vaccine with the first 3 doses given every 3 weeks and the last booster dose administered 14 weeks later. The monkeys were challenged orally with H. pylori one week after the last vaccine dose and euthanized 10 weeks after challenge, at which time, their stomachs were collected for determination of bacterial colonization and histopathology. Monkeys primed with the oral vaccine and boosted with the parenteral vaccine showed a statistically significant reduction in bacterial colonization when compared to sham-immunized control animals (P=0.05; Wilcoxon rank sums test). Monkeys receiving parenteral only regimes of urease plus Bay or alum showed no difference in bacterial colonization compared with sham-immunized controls (P=1.00 and P=0.33, respectively). The mucosal prime–parenteral boost regime did not cause gastropathy. There was no difference in any of the 3 treatment groups with respect to gastric epithelial changes compared to control animals. There was also no difference in the type and extent of gastric inflammatory cell infiltrates between animals vaccinated by the mucosal prime–parenteral boost strategy and sham immunized controls. However, monkeys receiving the two parenteral-only regimens had slightly elevated gastritis scores.