The dynamics and folding of potassium channel pore domain monomers are connected to the kinetics of tetramer assembly. In all-atom molecular dynamics simulations of Kv1.2 and KcsA channels, monomers adopt multiple nonnative conformations while the three helices remain folded. Consistent with this picture, NMR studies also find the monomers to be dynamic and structurally heterogeneous. However, a KcsA construct with a disulfide bridge engineered between the two transmembrane helices has an NMR spectrum with well-dispersed peaks, suggesting that the monomer can be locked into a native-like conformation that is similar to that observed in the folded tetramer. During tetramerization, fluoresence resonance energy transfer (FRET) data indicate that monomers rapidly oligomerize upon insertion into liposomes, likely forming a protein-dense region. Folding within this region occurs along separate fast and slow routes, with τ
fold ∼40 and 1,500 s, respectively. In contrast, constructs bearing the disulfide bond mainly fold via the faster pathway, suggesting that maintaining the transmembrane helices in their native orientation reduces misfolding. Interestingly, folding is concentration independent despite the tetrameric nature of the channel, indicating that the rate-limiting step is unimolecular and occurs after monomer association in the protein-dense region. We propose that the rapid formation of protein-dense regions may help with the assembly of multimeric membrane proteins by bringing together the nascent components prior to assembly. Finally, despite its name, the addition of KcsA’s C-terminal “tetramerization” domain does not hasten the kinetics of tetramerization.Many homo- and hetero-tetrameric ion channel monomers contain two transmembrane (TM) helices connected by a re-entrant pore loop segment (p) and adopt a modular structure with a “TM-p-TM” topology () (
1). The ion permeation pathway is created by the juxtaposition of the p-loop of each monomer along the tetramer’s symmetry axis. The highly conserved p-loop contains a short 3.5-turn helix and the ion selectivity filter (
1,
2). Mutations in this region are detrimental to potassium channel trafficking (
3) and are associated with diseases such as weaver (
4–
6) and long-QT syndrome (
3,
7,
8) (the QT interval is the time from the start of the Q wave to the end of the T wave).
Open in a separate windowKcsA TM Domain [Protein Data Bank (PDB) ID 3EFF]. (
A and
B) Top, side views. (
C) Monomer: TM helices TM1, TM2, pore helix, turret, and selectivity filter. (
D) Surface residues (polar, basic, and acidic residues are colored green, red, and blue, respectively).The folding of helical membrane proteins is thought to proceed in a two-stage manner, with insertion of stable TM α-helices followed by lateral packing within the bilayer (
9–
12). A more intricate three-stage model has also been proposed, where insertion and lateral packing of α-helices is followed by folding of loops, ligand binding, and insertion of peripheral domains (
10). The folding of multimeric membrane proteins also requires the assembly of independent subunits, “building blocks,” that may need to be at least partly folded before oligomerization. This raises the question: How folded are the ion channel’s subunits prior to tetramerization? In vivo, monomers are independently synthesized and inserted into the lipid bilayer from the ribosome–translocon complex. Then, for a K
+ channel, four monomeric subunits associate to form a functional tetrameric channel (
13). The tetramerization process may be assisted by cytosolic tetramerization domains that could help the monomers fold or assist in their association (
13,
14). However, prior studies have also shown that the pore domain can form tetramers on its own (
13,
15–
18) ().Several biophysical properties of K
+ channels are relevant to their dynamics. The ion-conducting pore of K
+ channels, formed by the re-entrant segment located between the two hydrophobic TM helices (termed TM1 and TM2 in KcsA and S5 and S6 in Kv1.3), is lined with polar and charged residues () (
19). If the helices retain the same structure and orientation as they do in the tetramer, the polar residues along with the non–hydrogen-bonded backbone atoms would be exposed to lipids in the channel’s monomeric form. As these interactions are energetically unfavorable, the dominant conformation of individual monomers prior to tetramerization is unclear. Previous thiol-labeling experiments have shown that for Kv1.3, the monomers maintain the helical structure of the re-entrant pore helix in a native-like orientation at the water–lipid interface (
20,
21). Likewise, previous molecular dynamics (MD) simulations indicated that the monomers’ native conformation (i.e., the conformation observed in the assembled tetramer) was surprisingly stable on a timescale of ∼1 μs (
21).In this paper, the dynamics of KcsA and Kv1.2 pore domain monomers are first investigated using MD and NMR. Then, we connect their dynamics to the kinetics of tetramerization using a gel-based refolding assay and fluoresence resonance energy transfer (FRET) on KcsA. The monomers are seen to associate in the bilayer prior to tetramerization, suggesting that the liposome provides a poor solvent environment for KcsA’s TM helices. A comparison between wild-type (WT) KcsA and an enhanced folding construct containing a disulfide bond linking TM1 and TM2 (A29C-A109C) indicates that the arrangement of the TM helices can influence the kinetics of folding and misfolding. Finally, the lack of concentration dependence in folding kinetics points to a late rate-limiting step occurring after monomer association.
相似文献